Rotational Panoramic Versus Intraoral Rectangular Radiographs for Evaluation of Peri-implant Bone Loss in the Anterior Atrophic Mandible

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 873-878

  Zechner, Werner ^a   Watzak, Georg ^a   Gahleitner, André ^b   Busenlechner, Dieter ^a   Tepper, Gabor ^a   Watzek, Georg ^a,c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^c Dental School   (Austria)

^d LUDWIG BOLTZMANN INSTITUTE FOR LUNG VASCULAR RESEARCH   (Austria)

Author keywords

Atrophy; Dental implants; Intraoral radiography; Mandible; Panoramic radiography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BONE ATROPHY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAORAL RADIOGRAPHY; JAW DISEASE; MALE; OSTEOLYSIS; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHY; ROTATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ATROPHY; DENTAL IMPLANTS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GINGIVAL HEMORRHAGE; HUMANS; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; MALE; MANDIBLE; MIDDLE AGED; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PERIODONTAL INDEX; PERIODONTAL POCKET; RADIOGRAPHY, PANORAMIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROTATION; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 0347418234     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Albrektsson T, Zarb GA, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants. A review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25.
2. Albrektsson T, Isidor F. Consensus Report of Session IV. In: Lang N, Karring T (eds). Proceedings of the First European Workshop on Periodontology. London: Quintessence, 1994: 365-369.
3. Pham A, Fiorellini J, Paquette D, Williams R, Weber H. Longitudinal radiographic study of crestal bone levels adjacent to non-submerged dental implants. Oral Implantol 1994;20(1):26-34.
4. Dahan J. Diagnostische Fehler in der metrischen Auswertung der Ruontgenaufnahmen. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1974;29: 331-340.
5. Jeffcoat M. Radiographic methods for the detection of progressive alveolar bone loss. J Periodontol 1992;63:367-371.
6. Bragger U, Hugel-Pisoni C, Burgin W, Buser D, Lang NP. Correlations between radiographic, clinical and mobility parameters after loading of oral implants with fixed partial dentures. A 2-year longitudinal study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:230-239.
7. Batenburg R, Meijer H, Geraets W, van der Stelt P. Radiographic assessment of changes in marginal bone around endosseous implants supporting mandibular overdentures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998;27:221-224.
8. Behneke A, Behneke N. Korrelation und Prädiktion klinischer und radiologischer Parameter enossaler Implantate. Z Zahnärztl Implantol 1999;15:209-223.
9. Garg A, Vicari A. Radiographic modalities for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry [review]. Implant Soc 1995;5:7-11.
10. Dula K, Mini R, van der Stelt P, Buser D. The radiographic assessment of implant patients: Decision-making criteria. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:80-89.
11. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockier B, Brånemark P-I. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;6:387-416.
12. Spiekermann H, Jansen V, Richter E. A 10-year follow-up study of IMZ and TPS implants in the edentulous mandible using bar-retained overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:231-243.
13. Jemt T, Chai J, Harnett J, et al. A 5-year prospective multicenter follow-up report on overdentures supported by osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11: 291-298.
14. Gröndahl K, Sunden S, Gröndahl H. Inter-and intraobserver variability in radiographic bone level assessment at Brånemark fixtures. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9: 218-224.
15. Van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M, Naert I, Maffei G, Jacobs R. Marginal bone loss around implants retaining hinging mandibular overdentures, at 4-, 8-and 12-years follow-up. J Clin Periodontol 2001;28:628-633.
16. Donatsky O. Osseointegrated dental implants with ball attachments supporting overdentures in patients with mandibular alveolar ridge atrophy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:162-166.
17. Mericske-Stern R, Steinlin-Schaffner T, Marti P, Geering A. Peri-implant mucosal aspects of ITI implants supporting overdentures. A five-year longitudinal study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5:9-18.
18. Gomez-Roman G, d'Hoedt B, Axmann D, Schulte W. Visual-metric measurement of peri-implant bone defects on radiographs. A reliability study. Z Zahnärztl Implantol 1996;12:104-109.
19. Meijer H, Steen W, Bosman F. Standardized radiographs of the alveolar crest around implants in the mandible. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:318-321.
20. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;8:307-310.
21. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 8. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, 1999.
22. Hollender L, Rockler B. Radiographic evaluation of osseointegrated implants of the jaws. Experimental study of the influence of radiographic techniques on the measurement of the relation between the implant and bone. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1980;9:91-95.
23. Sewerin IP. Errors in radiographic assessment of marginal bone height around osseointegrated implants. Scand J Dent Res 1990;98:428-433.
24. Tal H, Moses O. A comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography in the planning of implant surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1991;20:40-42.
25. Lindh C, Petersson A, Klinge B. Measurements of distances related to the mandibular canal in radiographs. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6:96-103.
26. Ekestubbe A, Gröndahl HG. Reliability of spiral tomography with the Scanora technique for dental implant planning. Clin Oral Implants Res 1993;4:195-202.
27. Schmelzeisen R, Hessling K, Overbeck R, Neukam F. Quantitative Bestimmung der Knochenresorption mit einem rechnergestützten Normierungsprogramm von OPT-Verlaufsaufnahmen. Z Zahnärztl Implantol 1991;7:44-48.
28. Grasser H, Barth H. Die Diagnostik von Interdentalkaries und apikaler Ostitis im Vergleich zwischen Orthopantomogramm und Zahnfilm. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1987;42:818-821.
29. Sonick M, Abrahams J, Faiella R. A comparison of the accuracy of periapical, panoramic, and computerized tomographic radiographs in locating the mandibular canal. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:455-460.
30. Keller U. Die Darstellung des periimplantären Knochenabbaues im Röntgenbild. Z Zahnärztl Implantologie 1993;11: 88-91.
31. Janson V, Augthun M, Richter E, Spiekermann H. Zur Genauigkeit des Orthopantomogramms bei der Bestimmung des Knochenabbaus an IMZ-Implantaten. Z Zahnärztl Implantat 1993;9:200-205.
32. Sivasriyanond C, Manson-Hing LR. Microdensitometric and visual evaluation of the resolution of dental films. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1978;45:811-822.
33. Larheim T, Svanaes D. Reproducibility of rotational panoramic radiography: Mandibular linear dimensions and angles. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1986;90:45-51.
34. Molander B, Ahlqwist M, Grondahl HG, Hollender L. Agreement between panoramic and intraoral radiography in the assessment of marginal bone height. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1991;20:155-160.
35. Thanyakarn C, Hansen K, Rohlin M, Akesson L. Measurements of tooth length in panoramic radiographs. 1. The use of indicators. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1992;21:26-30.