Surveying food and beverage liking: A tool for epidemiological studies to connect chemosensation with health outcomes

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Volumn 1170, Issue , 2009, Pages 558-568

  Duffy, Valerie B ^a   Hayes, John E ^b   Sullivan, Bridget S ^a   Faghri, Pouran ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Capsaicin; Diet survey; Dietary fats; Female; Food preferences; Obesity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BEVERAGE; BLOOD PRESSURE; BODY HEIGHT; BODY WEIGHT; COGNITION; CONFERENCE PAPER; DIETARY INTAKE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEMALE; FOOD PREFERENCE; HEALTH; HEALTH HAZARD; HIGH FIBER DIET; HUMAN; LIPID DIET; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEMORY; OBESITY;

EID: 68649117890     PISSN: 00778923     EISSN: 17496632     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04593.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (67)

1. Department of Chronic Diseases and Health Promotion. 2006. Preventing chronic diseases: a vital investment. www.who.int/chp/ chronic-disease-report/ contents/en/index.html [accessed on 6 February 2009].
2. Hayes, J.E. & V.B. Duffy. 2008. Oral sensory phenotype identifies level of sugar and fat required for maximal liking. Physiol. Behav. 95: 77-87.
3. Newell, A. et al. 2007. Addressing the obesity epidemic: a genomics perspective. Prev. Chronic Dis. 4: A31.
4. Sacerdote, C. et al. 2007. Lactase persistence and bitter taste response: instrumental variables and Mendelian randomization in epidemiologic studies of dietary factors and cancer risk. Am. J. Epidemiol. 166: 576-581.
5. Glanz, K. et al. 1998. Why Americans eat what they do: taste, nutrition, cost, convenience, and weight control concerns as influences on food consumption. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 98: 1118-1126.
6. International Food Information Council. 2007 Food & Health Survey: consumer Attitudes toward Food, Nutrition & Health. www.ific.org/research/ 2007foodandhealthsurvey.cfm [accessed on 6 February 2009].
7. Gibson, J.J. 1966. The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Houghton Mifflin. Boston, MA.
8. Lawless, H.T. 1996. Flavor. In Cognitive Ecology. M.P. Friedman & E.C. Carterette, Eds.: 384. Academic Press. San Diego, CA.
9. Small, D.M. & J. Prescott. 2005. Odor/taste integration and the perception of flavor. Exp. Brain Res. 166: 345-357.
10. Hayes, J.E. et al. 2008. Novel TAS2R SNP associations with taste sensation, liking or intake for alcoholic and bitter non-alcohol beverages. ISOT XV/AChemSXXXConference. San Francisco,CA, July 2008.
11. Cowart, B.J., Y. Yokomukai & G.K. Beauchamp. 1994. Bitter taste in aging: compound-specific decline in sensitivity. Physiol. Behav. 56: 1237-1241.
12. Blakeslee, A.F. 1932. Genetics of sensory thresholds: taste for phenylthiocarbamide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 18: 120-130.
13. Whissell-Buechy, D. & J.E. Amoore. 1973. Odourblindness tomusk: simple recessive inheritance. Nature 242: 271-273.
14. Hayes, J.E. et al. 2008. Supertasting and PROP bitterness depends on more than the TAS2R38 gene. Chem. Senses 33: 255-265.
15. Bajec, M.R. & G.J. Pickering. 2008. Thermal taste, PROP responsiveness, and perception of oral sensations. Physiol. Behav. 95: 581-590.
16. Wang, J.C. et al. 2007. Functional variants in TAS2R38 and TAS2R16 influence alcohol consumption in high-risk families of African-American origin. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 31: 209-215.
17. Pangborn, R.M. 1980. Critical analysis of sensory responses to sweetness. In Carbohydrate Sweeteners in Foods and Nutrition. P. Koivistoinen, L. Hyv'eonen & Scandinavian Agricultural Research Workers' Association, Eds.: pp. 87-110. Academic Press. London, UK.
18. Keskitalo, K. et al. 2007. Sweet taste preferences are partly genetically determined: identification of a trait locus on chromosome 16.Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 86: 55-63.
19. Yeomans, M.R. et al. 2007. Human hedonic responses to sweetness: role of taste genetics and anatomy. Physiol. Behav. 91: 264-273.
20. Keller, A. et al. 2007. Genetic variation in a human odorant receptor alters odour perception. Nature 449: 468-472.
21. Duffy, V.B. & L.M. Bartoshuk. 2000. Food acceptance and genetic variation in taste. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 100: 647-655.
22. Duffy, V.B. 2004. Associations between oral sensation, dietary behaviors and risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Appetite 43: 5-9.
23. Duffy, V.B. et al. 2003. Genetic and environmental variation in taste: associations with sweet intensity, preference and intake. Top. Clin. Nutr. 18: 209- 220.
24. Duffy, V.B., J. Peterson & L.M. Bartoshuk. 2004. Associations between taste genetics, oral sensations and alcohol intake. Physiol. Behav. 82: 435- 445.
25. Duffy, V.B. et al. 2004. Bitter receptor gene (TAS2R38), 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) bitterness and alcohol intake. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 28: 1629- 1637.
26. Bartoshuk, L.M. et al. 2006. Psychophysics of sweet and fat perception in obesity: problems, solutions and new perspectives. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 361: 1137-1148.
27. Bartoshuk, L.M. et al. 2005.Taste damage: previously unsuspected consequences. Chem. Senses 30(Suppl 1): i218-i219.
28. Duffy, V.B. 2007. Variation in oral sensation: implications for diet and health. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 23: 171-177.
29. Sorensen, L.B. et al. 2003. Effect of sensory perception of foods on appetite and food intake: a review of studies on humans. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 27: 1152-1166.
30. Margolskee, R.F. et al. 2007. T1R3 and gustducin in gut sense sugars to regulate expression of Na+- glucose cotransporter 1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104: 15075-15080.
31. Keller, K.L. et al. 2002. Genetic taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil influences food preference and reported intake in preschool children. Appetite 38: 3-12.
32. Dinehart, M.E. et al. 2006. Bitter taste markers explain variability in vegetable sweetness, bitterness, and intake. Physiol. Behav. 87: 304-313.
33. Lanier, S.A., J.E. Hayes & V.B. Duffy. 2005. Sweet and bitter tastes of alcoholic beverages mediate alcohol intake in of-age undergraduates. Physiol. Behav. 83: 821-831.
34. Bell, K.I. & B.J. Tepper. 2006. Short-term vegetable intake by young children classified by 6-npropylthoiuracil bitter-taste phenotype. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 84: 245-251.
35. Hayes, J.E. 2007. Translating taste genetics to adiposity: sensation, preference and intake of high-fat sweet foods. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
36. Duffy, V.B. et al. 2007. Food preference questionnaire as a screening tool for assessing dietary risk of cardiovascular disease within health risk appraisals. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 107: 237-245.
37. Hinrichs, A.L. et al. 2006. Functional variant in a bitter-taste receptor (hTAS2R16) influences risk of alcohol dependence. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 78: 103- 111.
38. Shiffman, D. et al. 2008. Association of gene variants with incidentmyocardial infarction in the Cardiovascular Health Study. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 28: 173-179.
39. Timpson, N.J. et al. 2005. TAS2R38 (phenylthiocarbamide) haplotypes, coronary heart disease traits, and eating behavior in the British Women's Heart and Health Study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 81: 1005-1011.
40. Tepper, B.J. et al. 2008. Variation in the bitter-taste receptor gene TAS2R38, and adiposity in a genetically isolated population in southern Italy. Obesity 16: 2289-2295.
41. Gottesman, I.I. & T.D. Gould. 2003. The endophenotype concept in psychiatry: etymology and strategic intentions. Am. J. Psychiatry 160: 636-645.
42. Johnson, M.K., J.K. Kim & G. Risse. 1985. Do alcoholic Korsakoff 's syndrome patients acquire affective reactions? J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 11: 22-36.
43. Ricketts, C.D. 1997. Fat preferences, dietary fat intake and body composition in children. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 51: 778-781.
44. Drewnowski, A. & C. Hann. 1999. Food preferences and reported frequencies of food consumption as predictors of current diet in young women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 70: 28-36.
45. Hayes, J.E. & V.B. Duffy. 2007. Explaining variance in central adiposity through taste phenotype and food preference. Presented at 7th Pangborn Sensory Science Symposium, Minneapolis, MN, August 12-16, 2007.
46. Ledikwe, J.H. et al. 2007. A reliable, valid questionnaire indicates that preference for dietary fat declines when following a reduced-fat diet. Appetite 49: 74-83.
47. Hebert, J.R. et al. 2008. Social desirability trait influences on self-reported dietary measures among diverse participants in amulticentermultiple risk factor trial. J. Nutr. 138: 226S-234S.
48. Teal, C.R. et al. 2007. Is the MEDFICTS Rapid Dietary Fat Screener valid for premenopausal African- American women? J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 107: 773-781.
49. Mela, D.J. & D.A. Sacchetti. 1991. Sensory preferences for fats: relationships with diet and body composition. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 53: 908-915.
50. Nakamura, K. et al. 2001. Correlation between a liking for fat-rich foods and body fatness in adult Japanese: a gender difference. Appetite 36: 1-7.
51. McAdams, M.A., R.M. Van Dam & F.B. Hu. 2007. Comparison of self-reported and measured BMI as correlates of disease markers in US adults. Obesity (Silver Spring) 15: 188-196.
52. Tabachnick, B.G. & L.S. Fidell. 2000. UsingMultivariate Statistics. Allyn and Bacon. Boston, MA.
53. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2006. A Public Health Action Plan to Prevent Heart Disease and Stroke. Available at: www.cdc.gov/dhdsp/library/action-plan [accessed on 6 February 2009].
54. Krebs-Smith, S.M. & P. Kris-Etherton. 2007. How doesMyPyramid compare to other population-based recommendations for controlling chronic disease? J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 107: 830-837.
55. Xu, J. et al. 2006. Dietary fat intake and risk of coronary heart disease: the Strong Heart Study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 84: 894-902.
56. He, K., Y. Xu & L. Van Horn. 2007. The puzzle of dietary fat intake and risk of ischemic stroke: a brief review of epidemiologic data. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 107: 287-295.
57. Krebs-Smith, S.M. et al. 2000. Low energy reporters vs. others: a comparison of reported food intakes. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 54: 281-287.
58. Kennedy, K. et al. 2009. Food liking surveys: enhancing assessment of vegetable and fruit intakes among preschoolers. Presented at the 7th International Conference on Diet and Activity Methods, Washington, DC, June 2009.
59. Prutkin, J. et al. 2000. Genetic variation and inferences about perceived taste intensity in mice and men. Physiol. Behav. 69: 161-173.
60. Stevenson, R.J. & M.R. Yeomans. 1995. Does exposure enhance liking for the chili burn? Appetite 24: 107-120.
61. Rozin, P. & D. Schiller. 1980. The nature and acquisition of a preference for chili pepper by humans. Motiv. Emot. 4: 77-101.
62. Ahuja, K.D.K. et al. 2006. Effects of chili consumption on postprandial glucose, insulin, and energy metabolism. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 84: 63-69.
63. Ahuja, K.D.K. et al. 2007. The effect of 4-week chili consumption on metabolic and arterial function in humans. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 61: 326-333.
64. Westerterp-Plantenga,M.S., A. Smeets & M.P. Lejeune. 2005. Sensory and gastrointestinal satiety effects of capsaicin on food intake. Int. J. Obes. 29: 682- 688.
65. Abbot, J.M. et al. 2008. Psychosocial and behavioral profile and predictors of self-reported energy underreporting in obese middle-aged women. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 108: 114-119.
66. Keskitalo, K. et al. 2007. Same genetic components underlie different measures of sweet taste preference. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 86: 1663-1669.
67. Schulze, T.G. & F.J. McMahon. 2004. Defining the phenotype in human genetic studies: forward genetics and reverse phenotyping. Hum. Hered. 58: 131- 138.