La misurazione di costrutti impliciti attraverso l'Implicit Association Test

Psicologia Sociale

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 65-94

  Zogmaister, Cristina ^a   Castelli, Luigi ^a  

^a Dipartimento di Psicologia Dello Sviluppo e della Socializzazione   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952690800     PISSN: 18272517     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1482/21502     Document Type: Review

References (108)

1. Aidman, E.V. e Carrol, S.M. (2003). Implicit individual differences: Relationships between implicit self-esteem, gender identity, and gender attitudes. European Journal of Personality, 17, 19-37.
2. Anderson, C.A. e Bushman, B.J. (2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 27-51.
3. Arcuri, L., Galdi, S. e Castelli, L. (2005). Un nuovo approccio metodologico per af-frontare un «antico» problema degli studi sul comportamento elettorale: la pre-visione delle scelte degli indecisi. In F. Gelli (a cura di), La democrazia locale tra rappresentanza e partecipazione. Milano: Franco Angeli, pp. 119-136.
4. Asendorpf, J.B., Banse, R. e Muecke, D. (2002). Double dissociation between implicit and explicit personality self-concept: The case of shy behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 380-393.
5. Banse, R., Seise, J. e Zerbes, N. (2001). Implicit attitudes toward homosexuality: Reliability, validity, and controllability of the IAT. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 145-160.
6. Blair, I.V. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 242-261.
7. Blair, I., Ma, J. e Lenton, A. (2001). Imaging stereotypes away: The moderation of automatic stereotypes through mental imagery. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 828-841.
8. Bluemke, M. e Friese, M. (in corso di stampa). Do features of stimuli influence IAT effects? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.
9. Boca, S. (1996). I processi cognitivi automatici in psicologia sociale: concettualizzazione e metodi d'indagine. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 23, 29-60.
10. Bosson, J.K., Swann, W.B. e Pennebaker, J.W. (2000). Stalking the perfect measure of implicit self-esteem: The blind men and the elephant revisited? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 631-643.
11. Brauer, M., Wasel, W. e Niedenthal, P. (2000). Implicit and explicit components of prejudice. Review of General Psychology, 4, 79-101.
12. Brendl, C.M., Markman, A.B. e Messner, C. (2001). How do direct measures of evaluation work? Evaluating the inference of prejudice in the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 760-773.
13. Brunel, F.F., Tietje, B.C. e Greenwald, A.G. (2004). Is the Implicit Association Test a valid and valuable measure of implicit consumer social cognition? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 385-404.
14. Cai, H. (2003). Explicit self-esteem, implicit self-esteem and depression. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 17, 331-336.
15. Castelli, L. e Tomelleri, S. (2005). Group effects on prejudice attitudes: When a group context leads to more egalitarian responses. Manoscritto inviato per la pubbli-cazione.
16. Castelli, L., Zogmaister, C., Smith, E.R. e Arcuri, L. (2004). On the automatic evaluation of social exemplars. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 373-387
17. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsda-le, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
18. Collins, A.M. e Loftus (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic memory. Psychological Review, 82, 407-428.
19. Collins, A.M. e Quillian, M.R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 240-247.
20. Crosby, F., Bromley, S. e Saxe, L. (1980). Recent unobtrusive studies of Black and White discrimination and prejudice: A literature review. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 546-563.
21. Cunningham, W.A., Preacher, K.J. e Banaji, M.R. (2001). Implicit attitude measures: Consistency, stability, and convergent validity. Psychological science, 12, 163-170.
22. Cunningham, W.A., Johnson, M.K., Raye, C.L., Gatenby, J.C., Gore, J.C. e Banaji, M.R. (2004). Separable neural components in the processing of black and white faces. Psychological Science, 15, 806-813.
23. Dasgupta, N. e Greenwald, A.G. (2001). On the malleability of implicit attitudes: Combating prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 800-814.
24. Dasgupta, N., McGhee, D.E., Greenwald, A.G. e Banaji, M.R. (2000). Automatic White preference: Eliminating the familiarity explanation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 316-328.
25. De Houwer, J. (2001). A structural and process analysis of the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 443-451.
26. De Houwer, J. (2002). The Implicit Association Test as a tool for studying dysfunctional associations in psychopathology: strengths and limitations. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 33, 115-133.
27. De Houwer, J. e Eelen, P. (1998). An affective variant of the Simon paradigm. Cognition and Emotion, 12, 45-61.
28. de Jong, P. (2002). Implicit self-esteem and social anxiety: Differential self-positivity effects in high and low anxious individuals. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40, 501-508.
29. de Jong, P., van den Hout., M.A., Rietbroek H. e Huijding, J. (2003). Dissociations between implicit and explicit attitudes toward phobic stimuli. Cognition and Emotion, 17, 521-545.
30. Devine, P. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18.
31. Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., Johnson, C., Johnson, B. e Howard, A. (1997). On the nature of prejudice: Automatic and controlled processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 510-540.
32. Egloff, B. e Schmuckle, S.C. (2002). Predictive validity of an Implicit Association Test for assessing anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1441-1455.
33. Egloff, B., e Schmukle, S.C. (2003). Does social desirability moderate the relationship between implicit and explicit anxiety measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1697-1706.
34. Fazio, R.H., Jackson, J.R., Dunton, B.C. e Williams, C.J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1013-1027.
35. Fazio, R.H. e Olson, M.A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297-327.
36. Fiedler, K. e Bluemke, M. (in corso di stampa). Faking the IAT: Aided and unaided response control on the Implicit Association Test. Basic and Applied Social Psychology.
37. Foroni, F. e Mayr, U. (2005). The power of a story: New, automatic associations from a single reading of a short scenario. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 139-144.
38. Franco, F.M. e Maass, A. (1999). Intentional control over prejudice: When the choice of the measure matters. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 469-477.
39. Funder, D.C. (1999). Personality judgment: A realistic approach to person perception. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
40. Galdi, S., Castelli, L. e Arcuri, L. (2005). Alla ricerca dei «percorsi carsici» delle scelte elettorali. Proposta di una nuova tecnica per monitorare e analizzare le compo-nenti implicite delle decisioni di voto. Polena, 2, 49-72.
41. Gawronski, B. (2002). What does the Implicit Association Test measure? A test of the convergent and discriminant validity of prejudice related IATs. Experimental Psychology, 49, 171-180.
42. Gemar, M.C., Segal, Z.V., Sagrati, S. e Kennedy, S.J. (2001). Mood-induced changes on the Implicit Association Test in recovered depressed patients. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 282-289.
43. Govan, C.L. e Williams, K.D. (2004). Changing the affective valence of the stimulus items influences the IAT by redefining the category labels. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 357-365.
44. Gray, N.S., MacCulloch, M.J. Smith, J., Morris, M. e Snowden, R.J. (2003). Violence viewed by psychopathic murderers: Adapting a revealing test may expose those psychopaths who are most likely to kill. Nature, 423, 497-498.
45. Greenwald, A.G. (2004). Revised Top 10 List of Things Wrong with the IAT. Contri-buto all'Attitudes Preconference del quinto congresso annuale della Society of Personality and Social Psychology, Austin, TX.
46. Greenwald, A.G. e Banaji, M.R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4-27.
47. Greenwald, A.G. e Farnham, S.D. (2000), Using the Implicit Association Test to measure self-esteem and self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 1022-1038.
48. Greenwald, A.G., McGhee, D.E. e Schwartz, J.K.L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
49. Greenwald, A.G. e Nosek, B.A. (2001). Health of the Implicit Association Test at age 3. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 85-93.
50. Greenwald, A.G., Nosek, B.A., Banaji, M.R. e Klauer, K.C. (in corso di stampa). Validity of the salience asymmetry interpretation of the IAT: Comment on Rother-mund and Wentura (2004). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
51. Haines, E.L. (2000). Elements of a social power schema: Gender standpoint, self-concept, and experience. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 60 (9-B), 4964.
52. Hummert, M.L., Garstka, T.A., O'Brien, L.T., Greenwald, A.G. e Mellott, D.S. (2002). Using the implicit association test to measure age differences in implicit social cognition. Psychology and Aging, 17, 482-495.
53. Jajodia, A. e Earleywine, M. (2003). Measuring alcoholic expectancies with the Implicit Association Test. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 17, 126-133.
54. Karpinski, A. e Hilton, J.L. (2001). Attitudes and the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 74-788.
55. Kim, D.Y. (2003). Voluntary controllability of the Implicit Association Test (IAT). Social Psychology Quarterly, 66, 83-96.
56. Kuhnen, U., Schiessl, M., Bauer, N., Paulig, N., Pohlmann, C. e Schmidthals, K. (2001). How robust is the IAT? Measuring and manipulating implicit attitudes of East-and West-Germans. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 135-144
57. Lobel, T.E. e Teiber, A. (1994). Effects of self-esteem and need for approval on affective and cognitive reactions: Defensive and true self-esteem. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 315-321.
58. Lowery, B.S., Hardin, C.D. e Sinclair, S. (2001). Social influence effects on automatic racial prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 842-855.
59. Maass, A., Castelli, L. e Arcuri, L. (2000). Measuring prejudice: Implicit versus explicit techniques. In D. Capozza e R. Brown (a cura di), Social identity processes. London: Sage, pp. 96-116.
60. Maison, D., Greenwald, A.G. e Bruin, R. (2001). The Implicit Association Test as a measure of implicit consumer attitudes. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 32, 1-9.
61. Marsh, K.L., Johnson, B.T. e Scott-Sheldon, L.A.J. (2001). Heart versus reason in condom use: Implicit versus explicit attitudinal predictors of sexual behavior. Zeit-schrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 161-175.
62. McConnell, A.R. e Leibold J.M. (2001). Relations among the Implicit Association Test, discriminatory behavior, and explicit measures of racial attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 435-442.
63. McFarland, S.G. e Crouch, Z. (2002). A cognitive skill confound on the Implicit Association Test. Social Cognition, 20, 483-510.
64. McFarlin, D.B. e Blascovich, J. (1981). Effects of self-esteem and performance feedback on future affective preferences and cognitive expectations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 521-531.
65. Mierke, J. e Klauer, K.C. (2003). Method-specific variance in the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1180-1192.
66. Mitchell, J.P., Nosek, B.A. e Banaji, M.R. (2003). Contextual variations in implicit evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 455-469.
67. Monteith, M.J. (1993). Self-regulation of prejudiced responses: Implications for progress in prejudice reduction efforts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 469-485.
68. Nosek, B.A., Banaji, M.R. e Greenwald, A.G. (2002a). Math = male, me = female, therefore math = me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 44-59.
69. Nosek, B.A., Banaji, M.R. e Greenwald, A.G. (2002b). Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site. Group Dynamics, 6, 101-115.
70. Nosek, B.A., Greenwald, A.G. e Banaji, M.R. (2005). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: II. Methodological Issues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 166-180.
71. Olson, M.A. e Fazio, R.H. (2004). Reducing the influence of extrapersonal associations on the implicit association test: Personalizing the IAT. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 653-667.
72. Ottaway, S.A., Hayden, D.C., Oakes, M.A. (2001). Implicit attitudes and racism: Effects of word familiarity and frequency on the implicit association. Social Cognition, 19, 97-144.
73. Paladino, M.P., Leyens, J.P., Rodriguez, R., Rodriguez, A., Gaunt R. e Demoulin, S. (2002). Differential association of uniquely and non uniquely human emotions with the ingroup and the outgroup. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 5, 105-117.
74. Palfai, T. e Ostafin, B.D. (2003). Alcohol-related motivational tendencies in hazardous drinkers: Assessing implicit response tendencies using the modified-IAT. Beha-viour Research and Therapy, 41, 1149-1162.
75. Paulhus, D.L. (1998). Interpersonal and intrapsychic adaptiveness of trait self-enhancement: A mixed blessing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1197-1208.
76. Phelps, E.A., O'Connor, K.J., Cunningham, W.A., Funayama, E.S., Gatenby, J.C., Gore, J.C. e Banaji, M.R. (2000). Performance on indirect measures of race evaluation predicts amygdala activation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 729-738
77. Poehlman, T.A., Uhlmann, E., Greenwald e A.G., Banaji, M. (2005). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Manoscritto inviato per la pubblicazione.
78. Richieson, J.A. e Ambady, N. (2003). Effects of situational power on automatic racial prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 177-183.
79. Roefs, A. e Jansen, A. (2002). Implicit and explicit attitudes toward high-fat foods in obesity. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 517-521.
80. Rothermund, K. e Wentura, D. (2001). Figure-Ground Asymmetries in the Implicit Association Test (IAT). Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie (Special Issue on the Implicit Association Test), 48, 94-106.
81. Rothermund, K., e Wentura, D. (2004). Underlying processes in the Implicit Association Test (IAT): Dissociating salience from associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 139-165.
82. Rudman, L.A., Ashmore, R.D. e Gary, M.L. (2001a). «Unlearning» automatic biases: The malleability of implicit prejudice and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 856-868.
83. Rudman, L.R., Greenwald, A.G. e McGhee, D.E. (2001b). Implicit self-concept and evaluative implicit gender stereotypes: Self and ingroup share desirable traits. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1164-1178.
84. Rudman, L.R., Greenwald, A.G., Mellott, D.S. e Schwartz, J.L.K. (1999). Measuring the automatic components of prejudice: Flexibility and generality of the Implicit Association Test. Social Cognition, 17, 437-465.
85. Rudman, L.A. e Kilianski, S.E. (2000). Implicit and explicit attitudes toward female authority. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1315-1328.
86. Sebaste, A. e Castelli, L. (2005). Percezione del rischio e cambiamento di atteggiamento nei confronti del fumo negli adolescenti: una ricerca sperimentale. Poster pre-sentato al V Convegno nazionale su «La prevenzione nella scuola e nella comu-nità», Padova, 23-25 Giugno.
87. Seibt, B. e Neumann, R. (2002). Motivation influences on the IAT: Food deprivation predicts implicit attitudes toward food. Poster presentato al XIII General Meeting dell'European Association of Experimental Social Psychology, San Sebastian, Spagna, 26-29 giugno 2002.
88. Shapiro, S. e Krishnan, H.S. (2001). Memory-based measures for assessing advertising effects: A comparison of explicit and implicit memory effects. Journal of Advertising, 30, 1-18.
89. Sherman, S.J., Presson, C.C., Chassin, L., Rose, J.S. e Koch, K. (2003). Implicit and explicit attitudes toward cigarette smoking: The effects of context and motiva-tion. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 22, 13-39.
90. Sigall, H. e Page, R. (1971). Current stereotypes: A little fading, a little faking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 247-255.
91. Skowronski, J.J. e Lawrence, M.A. (2001) A comparative study of the implicit and explicit gender attitudes of children and college students. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 155-166
92. Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E. e MacGregor, D.G. (2002). The affect heuristic. In D. Griffin, e T. Gilovich, (a cura di) Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 397-420.
93. Smith, E.R. (1996). What do connectionism and social psychology offer each other? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 893-912.
94. Steffens, M.C. (2004). Is the Implicit Association Test immune to faking? Experimental Psychology, 51, 165-179.
95. Steffens, M.C. e Plewe, I. (2001). Items' cross-category associations as a confounding factor in the Implicit Association Test. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 123-134.
96. Strack, F. e Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behaviour. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220-247.
97. Swanson, J.E., Rudman, L.A. e Greenwald, A.G. (2001). Using the Implicit Association Test to investigate attitude-behavior consistency for stigmatized behavior. Cognition and Emotion, 15, 207-230.
98. Teachman, B.A., Gapinski, K.D., Brownell, K.D., Rawlins e M., Jeyaram, S. (2003). Demonstration of implicit anti-fat bias: The impact of providing causal information and evoking empathy. Health Psychology, 22, 68-78.
99. Teachman, B.A., Gregg, A.P. e Woody, S.R. (2001). Implicit associations of fear-relevant stimuli among individuals with snake and spider fears. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 226-235.
100. Teachman, B.A. e Woody, S.R. (2003). Automatic processing in spider phobia: Implicit fear associations over the course of treatment. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 100-109.
101. Uhlmann, E. e Swanson, J. (2004). Exposure to violent video games increases automatic aggressiveness. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 41-52.
102. Vande-Kamp, M.E. (2003). Auditory implicit association tests. Tesi di dottorato, University of Washington, USA.
103. Wiers, R. W., van Woerden, N., Smulders, F.T.Y. e de Jong, P. (2002). Implicit and explicit alcohol related cognitions in heavy and light drinkers. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 648-658.
104. Wilson, T.D., Lindsay, S. e Schooler, T.Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107, 101-126.
105. Wittenbrink, B., Judd, C.M. e Park, B. (1997). Evidence for racial prejudice at the implicit level and its relationship with questionnaire measures. Journal of Perso-nality and Social Psychology, 72, 262-274.
106. Zogmaister, C., Arcuri, L. e Modena, S. (in corso di stampa). La percezione di gruppi caratterizzati da status sociale asimmetrico. Rapporto tra processi impliciti ed espliciti. Rassegna di Psicologia.
107. Zogmaister, C., Arcuri, L., Castelli, L. e Smith, E.R. (2005a). Social norms and inter-group bias. Manoscritto in fase di preparazione.
108. Zogmaister, C., Mattedi, S. e Arcuri, L. (2005b). Autostima implicita ed esplicita: due strumenti d'indagine a confronto. Psicologia dell'Educazione e della Formazione, 7, 21-38.