TEAMS OF PRACTISING TEACHERS: Developing Teacher Professionals

Participants in Mathematics Teacher Education: Individuals, Teams, Communities and Networks: Volume 3

Volumn 3, Issue , 2008, Pages 89-109

  Nickerson, Susan D ^a  

^a SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952430873     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (59)

1. Adler, J. (2000). Conceptualizing resources as a theme for teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3, 205-224
2. Adler, J., Ball, D., Krainer, K., Lin, F.-L, & Novotna, J. (2005). Reflections on an emerging field: Researching mathematics teacher education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60, 359-381.
3. Adler, J., & Davis, Z. (2006). Opening another black box: Researching mathematics for teaching in mathematics teacher education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37, 270-296.
4. Atweh, B., & Clarkson, P. (2001). Internationalization and globalization of mathematics education: Toward an agenda for research/action. In B. Atweh, H. Forgasz, & B. Nebres (Eds.), Sociocultural research on mathematics education: An international perspective (pp. 77-94). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Ball, D. L. (1997). Developing mathematics reform: What don’t we know about teacher learning - but would make a good working hypothesis. In S. N. Friel & G. W. Bright (Eds.), Reflecting on our work: NSF teacher enhancement in K-6 mathematics (pp. 77-111). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
6. Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2000). Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: Knowing and using mathematics. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 83-104). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
7. Balfanz, R., Maclver, D., & Byrnes, V. (2006). The implementation and impact of evidence-based mathematics reforms in high-poverty middle schools: A multi-site, multi-year study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37, 33-64.
8. Bobis, J., Clarke, B., Clarke, D. M., Thomas, G., Wright, R., Young-Loveridge, J., & Gould, P. (2005). Supporting teachers in the development of young children’s mathematical thinking: Three large scale cases. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 16(3), 27-57.
9. Borasi, R., & Fonzi, J. (2003). Professional development that supports school mathematics reform. Foundations series of monographs for professionals in science, mathematics and technology education. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
10. Borasi, R., Fonzi, J., Smith, C. F., Rose, B. J. (1999). Beginning the process of rethinking mathematics instruction: A professional development program. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2, 49-78.
11. Carpenter, T. P., Blanton, M. L., Cobb, P., Franke, M. L., Kaput, J., & McClain, K. (2004). Research report: Scaling up innovative practices in mathematics and science. Madison, WI: National Center for Improving Student Learning and Achievement in Mathematics and Science.
12. Chissick, N. (2002). Factors affecting the implementation of reform in school mathematics. In A. Cockburn & E. Nardi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 248-256). Norwich, UK: University of East Anglia.
13. Chokshi, S., & Fernandez, C. (2004). Challenges to importing Japanese lesson study: Concerns, misconceptions, and nuances. Phi Delta Kappan, 85, 520-525.
14. Cobb, P., & McClain, K. (2001). An approach for supporting teachers’ learning in social context. In F.-L. Lin & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 207-231). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
15. Cohen, D. K. (1990). A revolution in one classroom: The case of Mrs. Oublier. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 327-345.
16. Cooney, T. J., & Krainer, K. (1996). Inservice mathematics teacher education: The importance of listening. In A. J. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Kietel, J. Kilpatrick, & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (Part 2, pp. 1155-1185). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
17. Farah-Sarkis, F. (1999). Inservice in Lebanon. In B. Jaworski, T. Wood, & S. Dawson (Eds.), Mathematics teacher education: Critical international perspectives (pp. 42-47). Philadelphia, PA: Falmer Press.
18. Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., Levi, M., Jacobs, V., & Empson, S. (1996). A longitudinal study of learning to use children’s thinking in mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 403-434.
19. Fernandez, C. (2005). Lesson study: A means for elementary teachers to develop the knowledge of mathematics needed for reform-minded teaching? Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7, 265289.
20. Fernandez, C., & Yoshida, M. (2004). Lesson study: A Japanese approach to improving mathematics teaching and learning. Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Fried, M., & Amit, M. (2005). A spiral task as a model for in-service teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 419-436.
22. Gamoran, A., Anderson, C. W., & Ashmann, S. (2003). Leadership for change. In A. Gamoran, C. W. Anderson, P. A. Quiroz, W. G. Secada, T. Williams, & S. Ashmann (Eds.), Transforming teaching in math and science: How schools and districts can support change (pp. 105-126). New York: Teachers College Press.
23. Hiebert, J., & Stigler, J. W. (2000). A proposal for improving classroom teaching: Lessons from the TIMMS video study. Elementary School Journal, 101, 3-20.
24. Jaworski, B., & Wood, T. (1999). Themes and issues in inservice programmes. In B. Jaworski, T. Wood, & S. Dawson (Eds.), Mathematics teacher education: Critical international perspectives (pp. 125-147). Philadelphia, PA: Falmer Press.
25. Jones, D. (1997). A conceptual framework for studying the relevance of context in mathematics teachers’ change. In E. Fennema & B. S. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 131-154). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. Keitel, C., & Kilpatrick, J. (1999). The rationality and irrationality of international comparative studies. In G. Kaiser, E. Luna, & I. Huntley (Eds.), International comparisons in mathematics education (pp. 242-257). London: Falmer Press.
27. Kilpatrick, J, Swafford, & B. Findell (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
28. Knight, P. (2002). A systemic approach to professional development: Learning as practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 229-241.
29. Krainer, K. (2001). Teachers’ growth is more than the growth of individual teachers: The case of Gisela. In F.-L. Lin & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 271-293). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
30. Krainer, K. (2003). Editorial: Teams, communities, & networks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6, 93-105.
31. Kwakman, K. (2003). Factors affecting teachers’ participation in professional learning activities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 149-170.
32. Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P. W., Love, N., & Stiles, K. E. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
33. McClain, K., & Cobb, P. (2004). The critical role of institutional context in teacher development. In M. Hoines & A. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 281-288). Bergen, Norway: University College.
34. Mohammad, R. F. (2004). Practical constraints upon teacher development in Pakistani schools. In M. Hoines & A. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 359-366). Bergen, Norway: University College.
35. Murray, H., Olivier, A., & Human, P. (1999). Teachers’ mathematical experiences as links to children’s needs. In B. Jaworski, T. Wood, & S. Dawson (Eds.), Mathematics teacher education: Critical international perspectives (pp. 33-41). Philadelphia, PA: Falmer Press.
36. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
37. Nickerson, S. D., & Brown, C. (2008). How resources matter in teacher professional development. Unpublished manuscript.
38. Nickerson, S. D., & Moriarty, G. (2005). Professional communities in the context of teachers’ professional lives: A case of mathematics specialists. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 113-140.
39. Podhorsky, C., & Fisher, D. (2007). Lesson study: An opportunity for teacher led professional development. In T. Townsend & R. Bates (Eds.), Handbook of teacher education: Globalization, standards, and professionalism in times of change (pp. 445-456). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
40. Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What new views of knowledge and thinking say about research on teaching and learning? Educational Researcher, 29, 4-15.
41. Secada, W., & Adajian, L. (1997). Mathematics teacher’s change in the context of their professional communities. In E. Fennema & B. S. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 193— 219). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
42. Shimahara, N. K. (2002). Teaching in Japan: A cultural perspective. New York: Routledge Falmer.
43. Shimizu, Y. (1999). Aspects of mathematics teacher education in Japan: Focusing on teacher roles. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2, 107-116.
44. Sowder, J. T. (2007). The mathematical education and development of teachers. In F. K. Lester, Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 157-224). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing and National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
45. Sowder, J. T., & Schappelle, B. P. (Eds.). (1995). Providing a foundation for teaching mathematics in the middle grades. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
46. Spillane, J. P. (1999). External reform initiatives and teachers’ efforts to reconstruct their practice: The mediating role of teacher’s zones of enactment. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(2), 143-175.
47. Spillane, J. P., & Zeuli, J. S. (1999). Reform and teaching: Exploring patterns of practice in the context of national and state mathematics reforms. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 1-27.
48. State of Victoria Department of Education and Early Childhood Development(2003). Early Numeracy Research Project Final Report.Online.www.soiweb.vic.edu.au/eys/num/ENRP/wholeschdes/plts.htm
49. Stein, M. K., & Brown, C. (1997). Teacher learning in social context: Integrating collaborative and institutional processes in a study of teacher change. In E. Fennema & B. S. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 155-191). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
50. Stein, M. K., Silver, E. A., & Smith, M. S. (1998). Mathematics reform and teacher development. In J. Greeno & S. V. Goldman (Eds.), Thinking practices in mathematics and science learning (pp. 1752). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
51. Talbert, J. E., & Perry, R. (1994). How department communities mediate mathematics and science education reforms. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, New Orleans, LA, April. The Journal of Mathematics and Science: Collaborative Explorations (2005). Vol. 8.
52. Tirosh, D., & Graeber, A. O. (2003). Challenging and changing mathematics teaching classroom practices. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 643-687). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
53. Tirosh, D., Stavy, R., & Tsamir, P. (2001). Using the intuitive rules theory as a basis for educating teachers. In F.-L. Lin & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 73-85). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
54. Walshaw, M., & Anthony, G. (2006). Numeracy reform in New Zealand: Factors that influence classroom enactment. In J. Novotnä, H. Moraovä, M. Krätkä, & N. Stehlkovä (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 5, pp. 361-368). Prague, Czech Republic: Charles University.
55. Whitenack, J. W., Knipping, N., Novinger, S., Coutts, L., & Standifer, S. (2000). Teachers’ mini-case studies of children’s mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3, 101-123.
56. Wilson, S. M., & Berne, J. (1999). Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of Research in Education, 24 (pp. 173-209). Washington DC: American Educational Research Association.
57. Wright, R. (1994). A study of the numerical development of 5-year-olds and 6-year-olds. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26, 25-44.
58. Yoshida, M. (2002). Framing lesson study for U.S. Participants. In H. Bass, Z. Usiskin, & G. Burrill (Eds.), Studying classroom teaching as a medium for professional development: Proceedings of a U.S.-Japan workshop (pp. 58-66). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
59. Zaslavsky, O., Chapman, O., & Leikin, R. (2003). Professional development of mathematics educators: Trends and tasks. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.),Second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 877-917). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.