Mathematics teacher eduaction around the world. A spiral task as a model for in-service teacher education

Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 419-436

  Fried, Michael N ^a   Amit, Miriam ^b  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Community of practice; In service; Spiral curriculum; Spiral task

Indexed keywords

EID: 31044454129     PISSN: 13864416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10857-005-3850-9     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Aldridge, B. (1992). Project of scope, sequence and coordination: A new synthesis for improving science education. scope, sequence, and coordination of secondary school science, 2. relevant research Washington, D.C: National Science Teachers Association.
2. Amit, M. (2000). Teaching mathematics in a diverse society. In Ahmed, Honor Kraemer (Eds.), Cultural diversity in mathematics (education): CIEAEM51 (pp. 385-389). Chichester: Horwood Publishing.
3. Amit, M. & Fried, M.N. (2002) Research, Reform, and Times of Change. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 355-382). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. Publishers.
4. Amit, M. & Hillman, S. (1999). Changing mathematics instruction and assessment: Challenging teachers' conceptions. In B. Jaworski T. Wood S. Dawson (Eds.), Mathematics teacher education: Critical international perspectives (pp. 17-25) London: Falmer Press.
5. Ball, D. & Bass, H. (2000). Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: Knowing and using mathematics. In J. Boaler (Ed) Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp 83-104). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
6. Britt, M.S., Irwin, K.C. Ritchie G. (2001) Professional conversations and professional growth. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4(1), 29-53. 10.1023/A:1009935530718
7. Brown, S.I. & Walter, M. (1990) The art of problem posing. Hilllsboro, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates, and London.
8. Bruner J.S. (1960) The process of education. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
9. DeBoer, G. (1991). A history of ideas in science education: Implications for practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
10. Giménez, J., FitzSimons, G.E. Hahn, C., (Eds) (2004). A challenge for mathematics educations: To reconcile commonalities and differences: Proceedings of CIEAEM 54. Barcelona: Graó.
11. Horn, R.A (2000) Teacher talk: A postformal inquiry into educational change. New York: P. Lang.
12. Jenlink, P. Carr A.A. (1996). Conversation as a medium for change in education. Educational Technology, 36:(1), 31-38.
13. Lave J. & Wenger E. (1991) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Louzoun, D., Amit, M., Ceaushu, C., Fried, M., Kapulnick, E., Perry, J., Sataniov, P., Zeltser, I. & Weitsman, G. (2000) Pratique en classe ou formation intellectuelle: Appréshensions différentes entre enseignants et enseignés dans la formation permanente. In A. Ahmed J.M. Kraemer & H. Williams (Eds.), Cultural diversity in mathematics (education): CIEAEM51 (pp. 139-143). Chichester: Horwood Publishing.
15. Roth, W.M. (1998) Designing communities. Boston: Kluwer.
16. Schmidt, W.H., McKnight, C.C. & Raizen S.A. (1996) A splintered vision: An investigation of U.S. science and mathematics education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
17. Stigler, J.W & Hiebert, J. (1999) The teaching gap. New York: Free Press.
18. Zaglavsky, O. & Leikin, R. (2004). Professional development of mathematics teacher educators: Growth through practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7, 5-32.