Proximal Femoral Bone Mineral Density After Resurfacing Total Hip Arthroplasty and After Standard Stem-Type Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty, Both Having Similar Neck Preservation and the Same Articulation Type

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 22, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 1208-1213

  Hayaishi, Yasuhisa ^a   Miki, Hidenobu ^a   Nishii, Takashi ^a   Hananouchi, Takehito ^a   Yoshikawa, Hideki ^a   Sugano, Nobuhiko ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Japan)

Author keywords

bone mineral density; dual energy x ray absorptiometry; metal on metal; resurfacing; total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AVASCULAR NECROSIS; BONE DENSITY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD; FEMUR NECK; FEMUR NECK FRACTURE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; OSTEOLYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSTHESIS; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE DENSITY; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 36748998919     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Engh C.A., and Bobyn J.D. The influence of stem size and extent of porous coating on femoral bone resorption after primary cementless hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 231 (1988) 7
2. Engh Jr. C.A., Sychterz C., and Engh Sr. C. Factors affecting femoral bone remodeling after cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 14 (1999) 637
3. Pritchett J.W. Femoral bone loss following hip replacement. A comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 314 (1995) 156
4. Nishii T., Sugano N., Masuhara K., et al. Longitudinal evaluation of time related bone remodeling after cementless total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 339 (1997) 121
5. Yamaguchi K., Masuhara K., Ohzono K., et al. Evaluation of periprosthetic bone-remodeling after cementless total hip arthroplasty. The influence of the extent of porous coating. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82-A (2000) 1426
6. Daniel J., Pynsent P.B., and McMinn D.J. Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86 (2004) 177
7. Udofia I.J., Yew A., and Jin Z.M. Contact mechanics analysis of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing prostheses. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 218 (2004) 293
8. Harty J.A., Devitt B., Harty L.C., et al. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry analysis of peri-prosthetic stress shielding in the Birmingham resurfacing hip replacement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 125 (2005) 693 [Electronic publication 2005 Oct 20]
9. Kishida Y., Sugano N., Nishii T., et al. Preservation of the bone mineral density of the femur after surface replacement of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86 (2004) 185
10. Shimmin A.J., Bare J., and Back D.L. Complications associated with hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 36 (2005) 187
11. Skinner J.A., Kroon P.O., Todo S., et al. A femoral component with proximal HA coating. An analysis of survival and fixation at up to ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85 (2003) 366
12. Ang K.C., Das De S., Goh J.C., et al. Periprosthetic bone remodelling after cementless total hip replacement. A prospective comparison of two different implant designs. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79 (1997) 675
13. Venesmaa P.K., Kroger H.P., Miettinen H.J., et al. Monitoring of periprosthetic BMD after uncemented total hip arthroplasty with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-a 3-year follow-up study. J Bone Miner Res 16 (2001) 1056
14. Rahmy A.I., Gosens T., Blake G.M., et al. Periprosthetic bone remodelling of two types of uncemented femoral implant with proximal hydroxyapatite coating: a 3-year follow-up study addressing the influence of prosthesis design and preoperative bone density on periprosthetic bone loss. Osteoporos Int 15 (2004) 281 [Eectronic publication 2003 Dec 6]