Preservation of the bone mineral density of the femur after surface replacement of the hip

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 86, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 185-189

  Kishida, Y ^a   Sugano, N ^a   Nishii, T ^a   Miki, H ^a   Yamaguchi, K ^b   Yoshikawa, H ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Japan)

^b Kaizuka City Hospital   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT; TITANIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE MINERAL; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FEMALE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE DENSITY; DENSITOMETRY, X-RAY; FEMALE; FEMUR; FEMUR HEAD NECROSIS; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 1642276053     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.86B2.14338     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Kroger H, Venesmaa P, Jurvelin J, et al. Bone density at the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1998;352:66-74.
2. McAuley JP, Sychterz CJ, Engh CA Sr. Influence of porous coating level on proximal femoral remodelling: A postmortem analysis. Clin Orthop 2000;371:146-53.
3. Nishii T, Sugano N, Masuhara K, et al. Longitudinal evaluation of time-related bone remodelling after cementless total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1997;339: 121-31.
4. Yamaguchi K, Masuhara K, Ohzono K, et al. Evaluation of periprosthetic bone-remodelling after cementless total hip arthroplasty: the influence of the extent of porous coating. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2000;82-A:1426-31.
5. Bobyn JD, Mortimer ES, Glassman AH, et al. Producing and avoiding stress shielding: Laboratory and clinical observations of noncemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1992;274:79-96.
6. McMinn D, Treacy R, Lin K, Pynsent P. Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip: Experience of the McMinn prosthesis. Clin Orthop 1996;329 Suppl:89-98.
7. Merle d'Aubigne R, Postel M. Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1954;36-A:451-75.
8. Gruen TA, McOeice GM, Amstutz HC. "MOdes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: A radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop 1979;141: 17-27.
9. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10.
10. Bland JM, Altman DG. Applying the right statistics: Analyses of measurement studies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;22:85-93.
11. Cohen B, Rushton N. Accuracy of DEXA measurement of bone mineral density after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1995;77-B:479-83.
12. Kroger H, Miettinen H, Arnala I, et al. Evaluation of periprosthetic bone using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: Precision of the method and effect of operation on bone mineral density. J Bone Miner Res 1996;11:1526-30.
13. Kiratli BJ, Checovich MM, McBeath AA, Wilson MA, Heiner JP. Measurement of bone mineral density by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in patients with the Wisconsin hip: An uncemented femoral stem. J Arthroplasty 1996;11:184-93.
14. Trevisan C, Bigoni M, Randelli G, et al. Periprosthetic bone density around a fully hydroxyapatite coated femoral stem. Clin Orthop 1997;340:109-17.
15. Wixson RL, Stulberg SD, Van Flandern GJ, Puri L. Maintenance of proximal bone mass with an uncemented femoral stem analysis with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. J Arthroplasty 1997;12:365-72.
16. Bell RS, Schatzker J, Fornasier VL, Goodman SB. A study of implant failure in the Wagner resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1985;67-A:1165-75.
17. Howie DW, Cornish BL, Vernon-Roberts B. Resurfacing hip arthroplasty: Classification of loosening and the role of prosthesis wear particles. Clin Orthop 1990;255: 144-59.
18. Amstutz HC, Grigoris P, Dorey FJ. Evolution and future of surface replacement of the hip. J Orthop Sci 1998;3:169-86.
19. Huiskes R, Strens PH, van Heck J, Slooff TJ. Interface stresses in the resurfaced hip: Finite element analysis of load transmission in the femoral head. Acta Orthop Scand 1985;56:474-8.
20. Watanabe Y, Shiba N, Matsuo S, et al. Biomechanical study of the resurfacing hip arthroplasty: Finite element analysis of the femoral component. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15:505-11.