Changes in proximal femoral strain after insertion of uncemented standard and customised femoral stems

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 83, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 921-929

  Aamodt, A ^a   Lund Larsen, J ^a   Eine, J ^a   Andersen, E ^a   Benum, P ^a   Husby, O S ^a  

^a TRONDHEIM UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANATOMY; ARTICLE; BONE STRESS; CLIMBING; COMPRESSION; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMPLANT; LOADING TEST; MALE; METAPHYSIS; PHYSIOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; STANDARD; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 0034865876     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.83B6.9726     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. A critical analysis of stress shielding evaluation of hip prostheses
2. Determinants of stress shielding: Design versus materials versus interface
3. Producing and avoiding stress shielding: Laboratory and clinical observations of non-cemented total hip arthroplasty
4. Paradox of strain shielding revisited, experimental evaluation of strain restoration: A comparison of four femoral implants
5. The effect of hip stem material modulus on surface strain in human femora
6. Role of loads and prosthesis material properties on the mechanics of the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty
7. The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials
8. Tissue ingrowth into titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated implants during stable and unstable mechanical conditions
9. Strain distribution in the proximal femur with flexible composite and metallic femoral components under axial and torsional loads
10. Design and fabrication of cementless hip stems
11. Femoral bone loss following hip replacement: A comparative study
12. Closeness of fit of uncemented stems improves the strain distribution in the femur
13. Computerized templating in uncemented total hip arthroplasty to assess component fit and fill
14. Maintenance of proximal bone mass with an uncemented femoral stem analysis with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry
15. The anatomic basis of femoral component design
16. Micromotion, fit and fill of custom made femoral stems designed with an automated process
17. Determination of the Hounsfield value for CT-based design of custom femoral stems
18. Abduction forces in the one-legged stance
19. The mechanism of bone remodelling and resorption around press-fitted THA stems
20. Influence of thigh muscles on the axial strains in a proximal femur during early stance in gait
21. An evaluation of three loading configurations for the in vitro testing of femoral strains in total hip arthroplasty
22. Muscular activity and the biomechanics of the hip
23. Proximal femoral strain: In-vivo and in-vitro measurements
24. In vivo measurements show tensile axial strain in the proximal lateral aspect of the human femur
25. In vitro stress shielding measurements can be affected by large errors
26. Assessment of the symmetry of bone strains in the proximal femoral medial cortex under load in bilateral pairs of cadaver femurs
27. Experimental method for in vitro testing of femoral cortical strains and mechanical stability of femoral stems
28. Effects of porous coating and collar support on early load transfer for a cementless hip prosthesis
29. Alterations in femoral and acetabular bone strains immediately following cementless total hip arthroplasty: An in vitro canine study
30. Quantification of implant micromotion, strain shielding, and bone resorption with porous-coated anatomic medullary locking femoral prostheses
31. Strain and micromotions of press-fit femoral stem prostheses
32. The paradox of femoral stress shielding: Cemented versus cementless femoral fixation
33. Effect of form elasticity of the prosthesis shaft in response to stress of the proximal femur
34. Fit of the uncemented femoral component and the use of cement influence the strain transfer the femoral cortex
35. Adaptive bone remodelling and biomechanical design considerations for non-cemented total hip arthroplasty