Examining immediate and maintenance effects of a reading intervention package on generalization materials: Individual verses group implementation

Journal of Behavioral Education

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 7-29

  Klubnik, Cynthia ^a   Ardoin, Scott P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Generalization; Individual versus group intervention; Listening passage preview; Maintenance; Oral reading fluency; Repeated readings

Indexed keywords

EID: 76649119435     PISSN: 10530819     EISSN: 15733513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10864-009-9096-3     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ardoin, S. P. (2006). The response in response to intervention: Evaluating the utility of assessing maintenance of intervention effects. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 713-725.
2. Ardoin, S. P., Carfolite, J., Klubnik, C., & McCall, M. (2009). Promoting generalization through providing additional opportunities to respond: Three versus six re-readings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 375-380.
3. Ardoin, S. P., & Christ, T. J. (2009). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading: Estimates of standard error when monitoring progress using alternate passage sets. School Psychology Review, 38, 266-283.
4. Ardoin, S. P., & Daly, E. J., I. I. I. (2007). Introduction to the special series: Close encounters of the instructional kind-how the Instructional Hierarchy is shaping instructional research 30 years later. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16, 1-6.
5. Ardoin, S. P., Eckert, T. L., & Cole, C. A. S. (2008). Promoting generalization of reading: A comparison of two fluency-based interventions for improving general education student's oral reading rate. Journal of Behavioral Education, 17, 237-252.
6. Ardoin, S. P., McCall, M., & Klubnik, C. (2007). Promoting generalization of oral reading fluency: Providing drill versus practice opportunities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16, 55-70.
7. Begeny, J. C., & Martens, B. K. (2006). Assisting low-performing readers with a group-based reading fluency intervention. School Psychology Review, 35, 91-107.
8. Begeny, J. C., & Silber, J. M. (2006). An examination of group-based treatment packages for increasing elementary-aged students' reading fluency. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 183-195.
9. Burns, M. K., & Sterling-Turner, H. E. (in press). Comparison of efficiency measures for academic interventions based on acquisition and maintenance. Psychology in theSchools.
10. Chafouleas, S. M., Martens, B. K., Dobson, R. L., Weinstein, K. S., & Gardner, K. B. (2004). Fluent reading as the improvement of stimulus control: Additive effects of performance-based interventions to repeated reading in students' reading and error rates. Journal of Behavioral Education, 13, 67-81.
11. Chard, D. J., Vaughn, S., & Tyler, B. (2002). A synthesis of research on effective interventions for building reading fluency with elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 386-406.
12. Christ, T. J., & Ardoin, S. P. (2009). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading: Passage equivalence and probe-set development. Journal of School Psychology, 47, 55-75.
13. Daly, E. J., I. I. I., Bonfiglio, C. M., Mattson, T., Persampieri, M., & Foreman-Yates, K. (2005). Refining the experimental analysis of academic skills deficits: Part I. An investigation of variables that affect generalized oral reading performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38, 485-497.
14. Daly, E. J., I. I. I., Martens, B. K., Barnett, D., Witt, J. C., & Olson, S. C. (2007). Varying intervention delivery in response to intervention: Confronting and resolving challenges with measurement, instruction, and intensity. School Psychology Review, 36(4), 562-581.
15. Daly, E. J., I. I. I., Martens, B. K., Dool, E. J., & Hintze, J. M. (1998). Using brief functional analysis to select interventions for oral reading. Journal of Behavioral Education, 8, 203-218.
16. Daly, E. J., I. I. I., Martens, B. K., Hamler, K. R., Dool, E. J., & Eckert, T. L. (1999). A brief experimental analysis for identifying instructional components needed to implement oral reading fluency. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 83-94.
17. Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.
18. Eckert, T. L., Ardoin, S. P., Daly, E. J., I. I. I., & Martens, B. K. (2002). Improving oral reading fluency: A brief experimental analysis of combining an antecedent intervention with consequences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 271-281.
19. Faulkner, H. J., & Levy, B. A. (1994). How text difficulty and reader skill interact to produce differential reliance on word and content overlap in reading transfer. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 58, 1-24.
20. Foorman, B. R., & Torgesen, J. (2001). Critical elements of classroom and small-group instruction promote reading success in all children. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 16, 203-212.
21. Haring, N. G., Lovitt, T. C., Eaton, M. D., & Hansen, C. L. (1978). The fourth R: Research in the classroom. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company.
22. Levy, B. A., Barnes, L., & Martin, L. (1993). Transfer of fluency across repetitions and across texts. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 401-427.
23. Martens, B. K., Eckert, T. L., Begeny, J. C., Lewandowski, L. J., DiGennaro, F. D., Montarellow, S. A., et al. (2007). Effects of a fluency-building program on the reading performance of low-achieving second and third grade students. Journal of Behavioral Educational, 16, 39-54.
24. Meyer, M. S., & Felton, R. H. (1999). Repeated reading to enhance fluency: Old approaches and new directions. Annals of Dyslexia, 49, 283-306.
25. Morgan, P. L., & Sideridis, G. D. (2006). Contrasting the effectiveness of fluency interventions for students with or at risk for learning disabilities: A multilevel random coefficient modeling meta-analysis. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 21(4), 191-210.
26. NAEP. (2007). National assessment of educational progress at grade 4, reading assessment. U. S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics.
27. NRP. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.
28. Persampieri, M., Gortmaker, V., Daly, E., Sheridan, S., & McCurdy, M. (2006). Promoting parent use of empirically supported reading interventions: Two experimental investigations of child outcomes. Behavioral Interventions, 21(1), 31-57.
29. Samuels, S. J. (1979). The method of repeated readings. The Reading Teacher, 32, 403-408.
30. Silver Burdett & Ginn. (1991). Word of reading. Morristown, NJ: Author.
31. SPSS for Windows. (2004). Rel. 16. 0 2004. Chicago: SPSS Inc.
32. Therrien, W. J. (2004). Fluency and comprehension gains as a result of repeated reading. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 252-261.
33. Therrien, W. J., Wickstrom, K., & Jones, K. (2006). Effect of a combined repeated reading and question generation intervention on reading achievement. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 21(2), 89-97.
34. Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., Kouzekanani, K., Bryant, D. P., Dickson, S., & Blozis, S. A. (2003). Reading instruction grouping for students with reading difficulties. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 301-315.
35. Witt, J. C., Martens, B. K., & Elliott, S. N. (1984). Factors affecting teachers' judgments of the acceptability of behavioral interventions: Time involvement, behavior problem severity, and type of intervention. Behavior Therapy, 15, 204-209.