Promoting generalization of oral reading fluency: Providing drill versus practice opportunities

Journal of Behavioral Education

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 54-69

  Ardoin, Scott P ^a   McCall, Michael ^a   Klubnik, Cynthia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Drill; Generalization; Instructional hierarchy; Multiple exemplars; Practice; Reading fluency; Repeated readings; Stimulus control

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846557431     PISSN: 10530819     EISSN: 15733513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10864-006-9020-z     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Ardoin, S. P. (2006). The response in response to intervention: Evaluating the utility of assessing maintenance of intervention effects. Psychology in the Schools, 43(6), 113-725.
2. Ardoin, S. P., Eckert, T. L., & Pender, C. A. S. (submitted). Generalization of academic responding: A comparison of two drill-based reading interventions for improving oral reading fluency.
3. Ardoin, S. P., Suldo, S. M., Witt, J. C., Aldrich, S., & McDonald, E. (2005a). Accuracy of readability estimates' predictions of CBM performance. School Psychology Quarterly, 20(1), 1-22.
4. Ardoin, S. P., Suldo, S. M., Witt, J. C., Aldrich, S., & McDonald, E. (2005b). Fourth grade students reading aloud: NAEP 2002 special study of oral reading, Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
5. Daly, E. J., III, Martens, B. K., Dool, E. J., & Hintze, J. M. (1998). Using brief functional analysis to select interventions for oral reading. Journal of Behavioral Education, 8(2), 203-218.
6. Daly, E. J., III, Martens, B. K., Hamler, K. R., Dool, E. J., & Eckert, T. L. (1999). A brief experimental analysis for identifying instructional components needed to implement oral reading fluency. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 83-94.
7. Daly, E. J., III, Persampieri, M., McCurdy, M., & Gortmaker, V. (2005). Generating reading interventions through experimental analysis of academic skills: Demonstration and empirical evaluation. School Psychology Review, 34(3), 395-414.
8. Daly, E. J. I., Bonfiglio, C. M., Mattson, T., & Persampieri, M. (2005). Refining the experimental analysis of academic skills deficits: Part I. an investigation of variables that affect generalized oral reading performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38(4), 485-497.
9. Dowhower, S. L. (1987). Effects of repeated reading on second-grade transitional readers' fluency and comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 22(4), 389-406.
10. Faulkner, H. J., & Levy, B. A. (1994). How text difficulty and reader skill interact to produce differential reliance on word and content overlap in reading transfer. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 58, 1-24.
11. Haring, N. G., & Eaton, M. D. (1978). Systematic procedures: An instructional hierarchy. In N. G. Haring, T. C. Lovitt, M. D. Eaton, & C. L. Hansen (Eds.), The fourth R: Research in the classroom. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merril Publishing Company.
12. Haring, N. G., Lovitt, T. C., Eaton, M. D., & Hansen, C. L. (1978). The fourth R: Research in the classroom. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company.
13. Huey, E. (1908/1968). The psychology and pedagogy of reading. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
14. National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the national reading panel, teaching children to read: an evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH publication no. 00-4754). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
15. National Reading Panel. (2005). The nations report card: Reading 2005. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
16. Shapiro, E. S. (1996). Academic skills problems. New York, NY: Guilford.
17. Shinn, M. R. (Ed.). (1998). Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement. New York: Guilford Press.
18. Spache, G. (1953). A new readability formula for primary grade material. Elementary English, 53, 410-413.
19. Therrien, W. J. (2004). Fluency and Comprehension Gains as a Result of Repeated Reading: A Meta-Analysis. Remedial & Special Education, 25(4), 252-261.
20. Torgesen, J. K. (2002). The prevention of reading difficulties. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 7-26.