Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading: Standard errors associated with progress monitoring outcomes from DIBELS, AIMSweb, and an experimental passage set

School Psychology Review

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 266-283

  Ardoin, Scott P ^a   Christ, Theodore J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 69549101921     PISSN: 02796015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ardoin, S. P., &Christ, T. J. (2008). Evaluating curriculum-based measurement slope estimates using data from tri-annual universal screenings. School Psychology Review, 37, 109-125.
2. Ardoin, S. P., Suldo, S. M., Witt, J. C, Aldrich, S., &McDonald, E. (2005). Accuracy of readability estimates' predictions of CBM performance. School Psychology Quarterly, 20(1), 1-22.
3. Ardoin, S. P., Witt, J. C, Suldo, S. M., Connel, J. E., Koenig, J. L., Resetar, J. L., et al. (2004). Examining the incremental benefits of administering a maze and three versus one curriculum-based measurement reading probe when conducting universal screening. School Psychology Review, 33, 218-233.
4. Betts, J., Pickard, M., &Heistad, D. (2009). An investigation of the psychometric evidence of CBM-R passage equivalence: Utility of readability statistics and equating the alternate forms. Journal of School Psychology, 47, 1-17.
5. Brennan, R. L. (2001). Generalizability theory. New York: Springer-Verlag.
6. Christ, T. J. (2006). Short term estimates of growth using curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: Estimates of standard error of the slope to construct confidence intervals. School Psychology Review, 35, 128-133.
7. Christ, T. J., &Ardoin, S. P. (2009). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading: Passage equivalence and probe-set development. Journal of School Psychology, 47, 55-75.
8. Christ, T. J., &Coolong-Chaffin, M. (2007). Interpretations of curriculum-based measurement outcomes: Standard error and confidence intervals. School Psychology Forum: Research in Practice, 1(2), 75-86.
9. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erl- baum Associates.
10. Compton, D. L., Appleton, A. C, &Hosp, M. K. (2004). Exploring the relationship between text-leveling systems and reading accuracy and fluency in second grade students who are average and poor decoders. Learning Disabilities Research &Practice, 79(3), 176-184.
11. Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.
12. Deno, S. L., Fuchs, L. S., Marston, D., &Shin, J. (2001). Using curriculum-based measurement to establish growth standards for students with learning disabilities. School Psychology Review, 30, 507-524.
13. Deno, S. L., Marston, D., &Tindal, G. (1985). Direct and frequent curriculum-based measurement: An alternative for educational decision making. Special Services in the Schools, 2(2), 5-27.
14. Deno, S. L., Mirkin, P. K., &Chiang, B. (1982). Identifying valid measures of reading. Exceptional Children, 49, 36-45.
15. Dunn, E. K., &Eckert, T. L. (2002). Curriculum-based measurement in reading: A comparison of similar versus challenging material. School Psychology Quarterly, 17, 24-46.
16. Francis, D. J., Santi, K. L., Barr, C, Fletcher, J. M., Varisco, A., &Foorman, B. R. (2008). Form effects on the estimation of students' oral reading fluency using DIBELS. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 315-342.
17. Francis, D. J., Shaywitz, S. E., Stuebing, K. K., Shaywitz, B. A., Fletcher, J. M., &Lyon, G. R. (1994). The measurement of change: Assessing behavior over time and within a developmental context. In R. G. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues (pp. 29-58): Paul H. Brookes.
18. Fuchs, L. S., &Deno, S. L. (1992). Effects of curriculum within curriculum-based measurement. Exceptional Children, 58, 232-242.
19. Fuchs, L. S., &Deno, S. L. (1994). Must instructional useful performance assessment be based in the curriculum? Exceptional Children, 61, 15-24.
20. Fuchs, L. S., Deno, S. L., &Mirkin, P. K. (1984). The effects of frequent curriculum-based measurement and evaluation on student achievement, pedagogy, and student awareness of learning. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 449-460.
21. Fuchs, L. S., &Fuchs, D. (1986). Effects of systematic formative evaluation: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 530), 199-208.
22. Fuchs, L. S., &Fuchs, D. (2002). Curriculum-based measurement: Describing competence, enhancing outcomes, evaluating treatment effects, and identifying treatment nonresponders. Peabody Journal of Education, 77(2), 64-84.
23. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., &Allinder, R. M. (1991). Effects of expert system advice within curriculum-based measurement on teacher planning and student achievement in spelling. School Psychology Review, 20(1), 49-66.
24. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Walz, L., &Germann, G. (1993). Formative evaluation of academic progress: How much growth can we expect? School Psychology Review, 22, 27-48.
25. Fuchs, L. S., Tindal, G., &Deno, S. L. (1984). Methodological issues in curriculum based reading assessment. Diagnostique, 9, 191-207.
26. Good, R. H., III, &Kaminski, R. A. (2002). DIBELS oral reading fluency passages for first through third grades (Technical Report No. 10). Eugene: University of Oregon.
27. Hintze, J. M., &Christ, T. J. (2004). An examination of variability as a function of passage variance in CBM progress monitoring. School Psychology Review, 33(2), 204-217.
28. Hintze, J. M., Shapiro, E. S., &Daly III, E. J. (1998). An investigation of the effects of passage difficulty level on outcomes of oral reading fluency progress monitoring. School Psychology Review, 27(3), 433-445.
29. Hintze, J. M., Shapiro, E. S., &Lutz, J. G. (1994). The effects of curriculum on the sensitivity of curriculum- based measurement in reading. The Journal of Special Education, 28, 188-202.
30. Howe, K., &Shinn, M. M. (2002). Standard reading assessment passages (RAPs) for use in general outcome measurement: A manual describing development and technical features. Retrieved June 29, 2004, from http://www.aimsweb.com/ uploads/pdfs/passagestech- nicalmanual.pdf
31. Jenkins, J. R., Zumeta, R., Dupree, O., &Johnson, K. (2005). Measuring gains in reading ability with passage reading fluency. Learning Disabilities Research &Practice, 20(4), 245-253.
32. Poncy, B. C, Skinner, C. H., &Axtell, P. K. (2005). An investigation of the reliability and standard error of measurement of words read correctly per minute using curriculum-based measurement. Journal of Psycho- educational Assessment, 23(4), 326-338.
33. Shapiro, E. S. (1996). Academic skills problems. New York: Guilford Press.
34. Shinn, M. R., Gleason, M. M., &Tindal, G. (1989). Varying the difficulty of testing materials: Implications for curriculum-based measurement. Journal of Special Education, 23(2), 223-233.
35. Stevens, J. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erl- baum Associates.
36. Tabachnick, B. G., &Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn &Bacon.