Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading: Passage equivalence and probe-set development

Journal of School Psychology

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 55-75

  Christ, Theodore J ^a   Ardoin, Scott P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Curriculum based measurement; Curriculum based measurement of reading

Indexed keywords

EID: 57249108204     PISSN: 00224405     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsp.2008.09.004     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Ardoin S.P., and Christ T.J. Evaluating curriculum based measurement slope estimate using data from tri-annual universal screenings school. Psychology Review 37 (2008) 109-125
2. Ardoin S.P., Suldo S.M., Witt J.C., Aldrich S., and McDonald E. Accuracy of readability estimates predictions of CBM performance. School Psychology Quarterly 20 (2005) 1-22
3. Bailin A., and Grafstein A. The linguistic assumptions underlying readability formulae: A critique. Language and Communication 21 (2001) 285-301
4. Betts J., Pickard M., and Heistad D. An investigation of the psychometric evidence of CBM-R passage equivalence: Utility of readability statistics and equating the alternate forms. Journal of School Psychology 47 (2009) 1-17 (this issue)
5. Brennan R.L. Generalizability theory. Journal of Educational Measurement 40 (2003) 105-107
6. Christ T.J. The effects of passage-difficulty on CBM progress monitoring outcomes: Stability and accuracy. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering 63 (2003) 10-B (UMI No. 4960)
7. Christ T.J. Short term estimates of growth using curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: Estimates of standard error of the slope to construct confidence intervals. School Psychology Review 35 (2006) 128-133
8. Christ T.J., and Vining O. Curriculum-based measurement procedures to develop multiple-skill mathematics computation probes: Evaluation of random and stratified stimulus-set arrangements. School Psychology Review 35 (2006) 387-400
9. Christ T.J., and Coolong-Chaffin M. Interpretations of curriculum-based measurement outcomes: Standard error and confidence intervals. School Psychology Forum 1 (2007) 75-86
10. Christ T.J., and Hintze J.M. Psychometric considerations of reliability when evaluating response to intervention. In: Jimmerson S.R., Vanderheyden A.M., and Burns M.K. (Eds). Handbook of response to intervention (2007), Springer, New York 93-105
11. Christ T.J., and Silberglitt B. Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: The standard error of measurement. School Psychology Review 36 1 (2007) 130-146
12. Christ T.J., Davie J., and Berman S. CBM data and decision making in RTI contexts: Addressing performance variability. Communique 35 2 (2006) 29-31
13. Christ T.J., Johnson-Gros K., and Hintze J.M. An examination of computational fluency: The reliability of curriculum-based outcomes within the context of educational decisions. Psychology in the Schools 42 (2005) 615-622
14. Compton D.L., Appleton A.C., and Hosp M.K. Exploring the relationship between text-leveling systems and reading accuracy and fluency in second-grade students who are average and poor decoders. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 19 (2004) 176
15. Crick J.E., and Brennan R.L. Generalized analysis of variance system (1983), University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
16. Cronbach L.J., and Gleser G.C. The dependability of behavior measures: Theory of generalizability for scores and profiles (1972), John Wiley & Sons, New York
17. Deno S.L. Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children 52 (1985) 219-232
18. Deno S.L., Marston D., and Tindal G. Direct and frequent curriculum-based measurement: An alternative for educational decision making. Special Services in The Schools 2 (1985) 5-27
19. Francis D.J., Santi K.L., Barr C., Fletcher J.M., Varisco A., and Foorman B.R. Form effects on the estimation of students' oral reading fluency using DIBELS. Journal of School Psychology 46 (2008) 315-342
20. Fuchs L.S. Assessing intervention responsiveness: Conceptual and technical issues. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 18 (2003) 172-186
21. Fuchs L.S., and Deno S.L. Effects of curriculum within curriculum-based measurement. Exceptional Children 58 (1992) 232-242
22. Fuchs L.S., and Deno S.L. Must instructionally useful performance assessment be based in the curriculum?. Exceptional Children 61 (1994) 15-24
23. Fuchs D., Fuchs L.S., McMaster K.N., and Al Otaiba S. Identifying children at risk for reading failure: Curriculum-based measurement and the dual-discrepancy approach. In: Swanson H.L., Harris K.R., and Graham S. (Eds). Handbook of learning disabilities (2003), Guilford Press, New York, NY 431-449
24. Good R.H., and Jefferson G. Contemporary perspectives on curriculum-based measurement validity. In: Shinn M.R. (Ed). Advanced applications of curriculum based measurement (1998), Guilford Publications, New York 61-88
25. Good III R.H., and Kaminski R.A. DIBELS oral reading fluency passages for first through third grades (Technical Report No. 10) (2002), University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon
26. Good R.H., Simmons D.C., and Kame'enui E.J. The importance and decision-making utility of a continuum of fluency-based indicators of foundational reading skills for third-grade high-stakes outcomes. Scientific Studies of Reading 5 (2001) 257-288
27. Hintze J.M., and Christ T.J. An examination of variability as a function of passage variance in CBM progress monitoring. School Psychology Review 33 (2004) 204-217
28. Hintze J.M., and Shapiro E.S. Curriculum-based measurement and literature-based reading: Is curriculum-based measurement meeting the needs of changing reading curricula?. Journal of School Psychology 35 (1997) 351-375
29. Hintze J.M., and Silberglitt B. A longitudinal examination of the diagnostic accuracy and predictive validity of R-CBM and high-stakes testing. School Psychology Review 34 (2005) 372-386
30. Hintze J.M., Christ T.J., and Keller L.A. The generalizability of CBM survey-level mathematics assessments: Just how many samples do we need?. School Psychology Review 31 (2002) 514-528
31. Hintze J.M., Daly III E.J., and Shapiro E.S. An investigation of the effects of passage difficulty level on outcomes of oral reading fluency progress monitoring. School Psychology Review 27 (1998) 433-445
32. Hintze J.M., Shapiro E.S., and Lutz J.G. The effects of curriculum on the sensitivity of curriculum-based measurement in reading. Journal of Special Education 28 (1994) 189-202
33. Hintze J.M., Owen S.V., Shapiro E.S., and Daly E.J. Generalizability of oral reading fluency measures: Application of G theory to curriculum-based measurement. School Psychology Quarterly 15 (2000) 52-68
34. Howe K.B., and Shinn M.M. Standard Reading Assessment Passages (RAPs) for use in general outcome measurement: A manual describing development and technical features (2002). http://www.aimsweb.com Retrieved from http://www.aimsweb.com
35. Kolen M.J., and Brennan R.L. Test equating, scaling, and linking (2004), Springer, New York
36. Klare G.R. The formative years. In: Zakaluk B.L., and Samuels S.J. (Eds). Readability: Its past, present, and future (1988), International Reading Association, Newark, DE 17-37
37. Marston D.B. A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and why do it. In: Shinn M.R. (Ed). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (1989), Guildford Press, New York 18-78
38. Poncy B.C., Skinner C.H., and Axtell P.K. An investigation of the reliability and standard error of measurement of words read correctly per minute using curriculum-based measurement. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 23 (2005) 326-338
39. Shinn M.R. Best practices in using curriculum-based measurement in a problem-solving model. In: Thomas A., and Grimes J. (Eds). Best practices in school psychology (2002), National Association of School Psychologists, Bethesda, MD 671-698
40. In: Shinn M.R. (Ed). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. (1989), Guildford Press, New York
41. Shinn M.R., and Shinn M.M. Administering and scoring of reading curriculum based measurement (R-CBM) for use in general outcomes measurement (2004). http://www.aimsweb.com Retrieved from www.aimsweb.com
42. Shinn M.R., Deno S.L., Fuchs L.S., Germann G., and Marston D. Curriculum-based measurement (CBM). Paper presented at the National Association of School Psychologists, Dallas, TX (2004)
43. Speece D.L., and Case L.P. Classification in context: An alternative approach to identifying early reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology 93 (2001) 735-749
44. Speece D.L., Case L.P., and Molloy D.E. Responsiveness to general education instruction as the first gate to learning disabilities identification. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 18 (2003) 147-156
45. SPSS Inc. SPSS for Windows (Version 13.0) (2004), Author, Chicago, IL
46. Wright J.A. OKAPI! (2005). http://www.interventioncentral.com/htmdocs/tools/okapi/okapi.php Available from http://www.interventioncentral.com/htmdocs/tools/okapi/okapi.php