Introduction to the special series: Close encounters of the instructional kind-how the instructional hierarchy is shaping instructional research 30 years later

Journal of Behavioral Education

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 1-6

  Ardoin, Scott P ^a   Daly III, Edward J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

Behavioral analysis; Instructional Hierarchy

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846471738     PISSN: 10530819     EISSN: 15733513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10864-006-9027-5     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Ardoin, S. P., Witt, J. C., Connel, J. E., & Koenig, J. (2005). Application of a three-tiered response to intervention model for instructional planning, decision making, and the identification of children in need of services. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23(4), 362-380.
2. Bijou, S. W. (1970). What psychology has to offer education: Now. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 3(1), 65.
3. Bushell, D., & Baer, D. M. (1994). Measurably superior instruction means close, continual contact with the relevant outcome data: Revolutionary. In R. G. III, D. M. Sainato, J. O. Cooper, T. E. Heron, W. L. Heward, J. W. Eshleman, & T. A. Grossi (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction (pp. 3-10). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
4. Catania, A. C. (1998). Learning (4th ed.). Upper Saddle, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5. Chard, D. J., Vaughn, S., & Tyler, B.-J. (2002). A synthesis of research on effective interventions for building reading fluency with elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(5), 386-406.
6. Daly, E. J., III, Bonfiglio, C. M., Mattson, T., Persampieri, M., & Foreman-Yates, K. (2005). Refining the experimental analysis of academic skills deficits: Part I. An investigation of variables that affect generalized oral reading performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38(4), 485-497.
7. Daly, E. J., III, Lentz, F. E., & Boyer, J. (1996). The instructional hierarchy: A conceptual model for understanding the effective components of reading interventions. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 369-386.
8. Daly, E. J., III, Martens, B. K., Kilmer, A., & Massie, D. R. (1996). The effects of instructional match and content overlap on generalized reading performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29(4), 507-518.
9. Haring, N. G. (1978). Research in the classroom: Problems and procedures. In N. G. Haring, T. C. Lovitt, M. D. Eaton, & C. L. Hansen (Eds.), The fourth R: Research in the classroom (pp. 1-22). Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merril Publishing Company.
10. Haring, N. G., & Eaton, M. D. (1978). Systematic procedures: An instructional hierarchy. In N. G. Haring, T. C. Lovitt, M. D. Eaton, & C. L. Hansen (Eds.), The fourth R: Research in the classroom. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merril Publishing Company.
11. Honig, W. K., & Staddon, J. E. R. (Eds.). (1977). Handbook of operant behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
12. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 USC 1400 note Sess.(2004).
13. Lindsley, O. R. (1996). Is fluency free-operant response-response chaining? Behavior Analyst, 19(2), 211.
14. Pany, D., & McCoy, K. M. (1988). Effects of corrective feedback on word accuracy and reading comprehension of readers with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21(9), 546.
15. Rose, T. L. (1984). The effects of previewing on retarded learners' oral reading. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, February, 49-53.
16. Shahan, T. A., & Chase, P. N. (2002). Novelty, stimulus control, and operant variability. Behavior Analyst, 25(2), 175.
17. Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research: Evaluating experimental data in psychology. New York: Basic Books.