Assisting low-performing readers with a group-based reading fluency intervention

School Psychology Review

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 91-107

  Begeny, John C ^a,c   Martens, Brian K ^b,d,e,f  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Department of Psychology   (United States)

^d North Carolina State University ^*

^e Division 16 of APA

^f Society for the Study of School Psychology

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646730492     PISSN: 02796015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Ardoin, S. P., S9uldo, S. M., Witt, J., Aldrich, S., & McDonald, E. (2005). Accuracy of readability estimates' predictions of CBM performance. School Psychology Quarterly, 20, 1-22.
2. Begeny, J. C., & Silber, J. M. (2006). An examination of group-based treatment packages for increasing elementary-aged students' reading fluency. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 183-195.
3. Bonfiglio, C. M., Daly, E. J., Martens, B. K., Lan-Hsiang, R., & Corsaut, S. (2004). An experimental analysis of reading interventions: Generalization across instructional strategies, time, and passages. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 111-114.
4. Carnine, D. W., Silbert, J., Keme'enui, E. J., & Tarver, S. G. (2004). Direct instruction reading (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
5. Carroll, J. B., Davies, P., & Richman, R. (1971). American heritage word frequency book. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
6. Chafouleas, S. M., Martens, B. K., Dobson, R. J., Weinstein, K. S., & Gardner, K. B. (2004). Fluent reading as the improvement of stimulus control: Additive effects of performance-based interventions to repeated reading on students' reading and error rates. Journal of Behavioral Education, 13, 67-81.
7. Chard, D. J., Vaughn, S., & Tyler, B. J. (2002). A synthesis of research on effective interventions for building reading fluency with elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 386-406.
8. Daly, E. J., Martens, B. K., Dool, E. J., & Hintze, J. M. (1998). Using brief functional analysis to select interventions for oral reading. Journal of Behavioral Education, 8, 203-218.
9. Daly, E. J., III, Martens, B. K., Hamler, K., Dool, E. J., & Eckert, T. L. (1999). A brief experimental analysis for identifying instructional components needed to improve oral reading fluency. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 83-94.
10. Dowhower, S. L. (1987). Effects of repeated reading on second-grade transitional readers' fluency and comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 389-406.
11. Foorman, B. R., & Torgesen, J. (2001). Critical elements of classroom and small-group instruction promote reading success in all children. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 203-212.
12. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Deno, S. L. (1985). Performance instability: An identifying characteristic of learning disabled children? Learning Disability Quarterly, 8, 19-26.
13. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Ferguson, C. (1992). Effects of expert system consultation within curriculum-based measurement, using a reading maze task. Exceptional Children, 58, 436-450.
14. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Walz, L., & Germann, G. (1993). Formative evaluation of academic progress: How much growth can we expect? School Psychology Review, 22, 27-48.
15. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239-256.
16. Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (Eds.). (2002). Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills (6th ed.). Eu gene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement. Available: http://dibels.uoregon. edu/
17. Hintze, J. M., Daly, E. J., & Shapiro, E. S. (1998). An investigation of the effects of passage difficulty level on outcomes of oral reading fluency progress monitoring. School Psychology Review, 27, 433-445.
18. Jenkins, J. R., & Jewell, M. (1993). Examining the validity of two measures for formative teaching: Reading aloud and maze. Exceptional Children, 59, 421-432.
19. Johnson, K., & Kevo, H. (1994). Morningside phonics fluency: Basic elements (2nd ed.). Seattle, WA: Morningside Press.
20. Kovaleski, J. F., Tucker, J. A., & Duffy, D. J. (1995). School reform through instructional support: The Pennsylvania initiative [Insert]. Communique, 25(8).
21. Kuhn, M. R., & Stahl, S. A. (2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 3-21.
22. LaBerge, D., & Sameuls, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.
23. Levy, B. A., Abello, B., & Lysynchuk, L. (1997). Transfer from word training to reading in context: Gains in reading fluency and comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 174-188.
24. Lovett, M. W., & Steinbach, K. A. (1997). The effectiveness of remedial programs for reading disabled children of different ages: Does the benefit decrease for older children? Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 189-210.
25. Marston, D. (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: What is it and why do it? In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 18-78). New York: Guilford Press.
26. Martens, B. K., Eckert, T. L., Begeny, J. C., Lewandowski, L. J., Fiese, B., DiGennaro, F. D., Montarello, S., & Arbolino, L. A. (2006). Direct and generalized effects of a fluency-based, after-school reading program. Manuscript in preparation.
27. Mathes, P. G., & Fuchs, L. S. (1994). The efficacy of peer tutoring in reading for students with mild disabilities: A best-evidence synthesis. School Psychology Review, 23, 59-80.
28. Mathes, P. G., Torgesen, J. K., & Allor, J. H. (2002). The effects of peer-assisted literacy strategies for first-grade readers with and without additional computerassisted instruction in phonological awareness. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 371-410.
29. National Center for Educational Statistics. (2004;. The nation 's report card: Reading highlights 2003. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
30. National Reading Panel. (2000). Fluency. In Teaching children to read (chapter 3). Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
31. O'Shea, L. J., Sindelar, P. T., & O'Shea, D. J. (1985). The effects of repeated readings and attentional cues on reading fluency and comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 17, 129-142.
32. O'Shea, L. J., Sindelar, P. T., & O'Shea, D. J. (1987). The effects of repeated readings and attentional cues on the reading fluency and comprehension of learning disabled readers. Learning Disabilities Research, 2, 103-109.
33. Pearson, P. D., Johnson, D. D., Clymer, T., Indrisano, R., Venezky, R. L., Baumann, J. F., Hiebert, E., & Toth, M. (1989). Silver, Burdett, and Ginn. Needham, MA: Silver, Burdett, and Ginn, Inc.
34. Rashotte, C. A., MacPhee, K., & Torgesen, J. K. (2001). The effectiveness of a group reading instruction program with poor readers in multiple grades. Learning Disability Quarterly, 24, 119-134.
35. Rayner, K., Foorman, B. R., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2, 31-74.
36. Rose, T. L. (1984a). The effects of two prepractice procedures on oral reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 544-548.
37. Rose, T. L. (1984b). Effects of previewing on the oral reading of mainstreamed behaviorally disordered students. Behavioral Disorders, 10, 33-39.
38. Scruggs, T. E., & Richter, L. (1985). Tutoring learning disabled students: A critical review. Learning Disability Quarterly, 8, 286-289.
39. Shapiro, E. S. (1996). Academic skills problems: Direct assessment and intervention. New York: Guilford Press.
40. Snow, C. E., Burns, S. M., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
41. Spache, G. (1953). A new readability formula for primary-grade reading materials. The Elementary School Journal, 53, 410-413.
42. Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
43. Witt, J. C., & Elliott, S. N. (1985). Acceptability of classroom management strategies. In T. R. Kratochwill (Ed.), Advances in school psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 251-288). Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. Witt, J. C., Elliott, S. N., & Martens, B. K. (1984). Acceptability of behavioral interventions used in classrooms: The influence of amount of teacher time, severity of behavior problem, and type of intervention. Behavioral Disorders, 10, 95-104.
45. Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.