There's Little Return for Attentional Momentum

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1726-1737

  Snyder, Janice J ^a   Schmidt, William C ^b   Kingstone, Alan ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

attention; attentional momentum; inhibition of return; visual search

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VISION;

ATTENTION; CUES; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 73649098793     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0016885     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Abrams R.A., and Dobkin R.S. Inhibition of return: Effects of attentional cuing on eye movement latencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20 (1994) 467-477
2. Bao Y., and Pöppel E. Two spatially separated attentional systems in the visual field: Evidence from inhibition of return. Cognitive Processing 8 (2007) 37-44
3. Bennett P.B., and Pratt J. The spatial distribution of inhibition of return. Psychological Science 12 (2001) 76-80
4. Berlucchi G., Tassinari G., Marzi C., and di Stefano M. Spatial distribution of the inhibitory effect of peripheral non-informative cues on simple reaction time to non-fixated visual targets. Neuropsychologia 27 (1989) 201-221
5. Birmingham E., Visser T.W.A., Snyder J.J., and Kingstone A. Inhibition of return: Unraveling a paradox. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 14 (2007) 957-963
6. Broadbent D.E. Perception and communication (1958), Oxford University Press, New York
7. Chelazzi L., Biscaldi M., Corbetta M., Peru A., Tassinari G., and Berlucchi G. Oculomotor activity and visual spatial attention. Behavioural Brain Research 71 (1995) 81-88
8. Cherubini P., Burigo M., and Bricolo E. Inference-driven attention in symbolic and perceptual tasks: Biases toward expected and unexpected inputs. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 59 A (2006) 597-624
9. Clohessy A.B., Posner M.I., Rothbart M.K., and Vecera S.P. The development of inhibition of return in early infancy. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 3 (1991) 345-350
10. Dandeneau S.D., Baldwin M.W., Baccus J.R., Sakellaropoulo M., and Pruessner J.C. Cutting stress off at the pass: Reducing vigilance and responsiveness to social threat by manipulating attention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 93 (2007) 551-566
11. Danziger S., Fendrich R., and Rafal R.D. Inhibitory tagging of locations in the blind field of hemianopic patients. Consciousness and Cognition 6 (1997) 291-307
12. Dickinson C.A., and Zelinsky G.J. Memory for the search path: Evidence for a high-capacity representation of search history. Vision Research 47 (2007) 1745-1755
13. Dobel C., Diesendruck G., and Bölte J. How writing system and age influence spatial representations of actions. Psychological Science 18 (2007) 487-491
14. Dorris M.C., Klein R.M., Everling S., and Munoz D.P. Contribution of the primate superior colliculus to inhibition of return. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 14 (2002) 1256-1263
15. Duncan J., Ward R., and Shapiro K. Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision. Nature 369 (1994, May 26) 313-315
16. Gibson B.S., and Amelio J. Inhibition of return and attentional control settings. Perception and Psychophysics 62 (2000) 496-504
17. Gibson B.S., and Egeth H. Inhibition of return to object-based and environment-based locations. Perception and Psychophysics 55 (1994) 323-339
18. Handy T.C., Jha A.P., and Mangun G.R. Promoting novelty in vision: Inhibition of return modulates perceptual level processing. Psychological Science 10 (1999) 157-161
19. Honda H. Idiosyncratic left-right asymmetries of saccadic latencies: Examination in a gap paradigm. Vision Research 42 (2002) 1437-1445
20. Hooge I.T., Over E.A.B., van Wezel R.J.A., and Frens M.A. Inhibition of return is not a foraging facilitator in saccadic search. Vision Research 45 (2005) 1901-1908
21. Hunt A., and Kingstone A. Inhibition of return: Dissociating attentional and oculomotor components. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29 (2003) 348-354
22. Ivanoff J., and Klein R.M. Stimulus-response probability and inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 11 (2004) 542-550
23. Ivanoff J., and Klein R.M. Inhibition of return: Sensitivity and criterion as a function of response time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 32 (2006) 908-919
24. Ivanoff J., Klein R.M., and Lupiáñez J. Inhibition of return interacts with the Simon effect: An omnibus analysis and its implications. Perception and Psychophysics 64 (2002) 318-327
25. Jahn G., Knauff M., and Johnson-Laird P.N. Preferred mental models in reasoning about spatial relations. Memory and Cognition 35 (2007) 2075-2087
26. Kanwisher N.G. Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition 27 (1987) 117-143
27. Kanwisher N. Repetition blindness and illusory conjunctions: Errors in binding visual types with visual tokens. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 17 (1991) 404-421
28. Kingstone A., and Pratt J. Inhibition of return is composed of attentional and oculomotor processes. Perception and Psychophysics 61 (1999) 1046-1054
29. Klein R.M. Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature 334 (1988, August 4) 430-431
30. Klein R.M. Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (2000) 138-147
31. Klein R.M., and MacInnes W.J. Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science 10 (1999) 346-352
32. Klein R.M., Munoz D.P., Dorris M.C., and Taylor T.L. Inhibition of return in monkey and man. In: Folk C.L., and Gibson B.S. (Eds). Attraction, distraction and action: Multiple perspectives on attentional capture advances in psychology (2001), Elsevier, New York 27-47
33. Klein R.M., and Taylor T.L. Categories of cognitive inhibition with reference to attention. In: Dagenbach D., and Carr T.H. (Eds). Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (1994), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 113-150
34. Lupiáñez J., Decaix C., Sieroff E., Chokron S., Milliken B., and Bartolomeo P. Independent effects of endogenous and exogenous spatial cuing: Inhibition of return at endogenously attended target locations. Experimental Brain Research 159 (2004) 447-457
35. Lupiáñez J., Milan E.G., Tornay F.J., Madrid E., and Tudela P. Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks? Yes, it does, but later. Perception and Psychophysics 59 (1997) 1241-1254
36. Lupiáñez J., Milliken B., Solano C., Weaver B., and Tipper S.P. On the strategic modulation of the time course of facilitation and inhibition of return. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 54 A (2001) 753-773
37. Lupiáñez J., and Solano C. Inhibition of return in a colour discrimination task: No interaction with the Simon effect. Cognitiva 9 (1997) 195-205
38. Maass A., Pagani D., and Berta E. How beautiful is the goal and how violent is the fistfight? Spatial bias in the interpretation of human behavior. Social Cognition 25 (2007) 833-852
39. Machado L., and Rafal R.D. Inhibition of return generated by voluntary saccades is independent of attentional momentum. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 57 A (2004) 789-796
40. MacLeod C.M., Dodd M.D., Sheard E.D., Wilson D.E., and Bibi U. In opposition to inhibition. Psychology of Learning and Motivation 4 (2003) 163-214
41. Maylor E.A., and Hockey R. Inhibitory component of externally controlled covert orienting in visual space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 11 (1985) 777-787
42. McDonald, J. J., Hickey, C., Green, J. J., & Whitman, J. C. (in press). Inhibition of return in the covert deployment of attention: Evidence from human electrophysiology. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
43. Milliken B., Lupiáñez J., Roberts M., and Stevanovski B. Orienting in time and space: Joint contributions to exogenous spatial cuing effects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 10 (2003) 877-883
44. Posner M.I., and Cohen Y. Components of visual orienting (1984), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
45. Posner M.I., Rafal R.D., Choate L.S., and Vaughan J. Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2 (1985) 211-228
46. Pratt J. Inhibition of return in a discrimination task. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2 (1995) 117-120
47. Pratt J., Hillis J., and Gold J.M. The effect of the physical characteristics of cues and targets on facilitation and inhibition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 8 (2001) 489-495
48. Pratt J., Spalek T.M., and Bradshaw F. The time to detect targets at inhibited and noninhibited locations: Preliminary evidence for attentional momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25 (1999) 730-746
49. Rafal R.D., Calabresi P.A., Brennan C.W., and Sciolto T.K. Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 15 (1989) 673-685
50. Raymond J.E., Shapiro J.L., and Arnell K.M. Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18 (1992) 849-860
51. Rayner K. Eye movements for parafoveally presented words. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 11 (1978) 13-16
52. Reppa I., and Leek E.C. Structure-based modulation of inhibition of return is triggered by object-internal but not occluding shape features. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 59 A (2006) 1857-1866
53. Reuter-Lorenz P.A., Jha A.P., and Rosenquist J.N. What is inhibited in inhibition of return?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 22 (1996) 367-378
54. Samuel A.G., and Kat D. Inhibition of return: A graphical meta-analysis of its time course and an empirical test of its temporal and spatial properties. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 10 (2003) 897-906
55. Samuel A.G., and Weiner S. Attentional consequences of object appearance and disappearance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27 (2001) 1433-1451
56. Sapir A., Hayes A., Henik A., Danziger S., and Rafal R. Parietal lobe lesions disrupt saccadic remapping of inhibitory location tagging. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16 (2004) 503-509
57. Sapir A., Soroker N., Berger A., and Henik A. Inhibition of return in spatial attention: Direct evidence for collicular generation. Nature Neuroscience 2 (1999) 1053-1054
58. Schmidt W.C. Inhibition of return is not detected using illusory line motion. Perception and Psychophysics 58 (1996) 883-898
59. Schmidt W.C. "Inhibition of return" without visual input. Neuropsychologia 34 (1996) 943-952
60. Sereno A.B., Briand K.A., Amador S.C., and Szapiel S.V. Disruption of reflexive attention and eye movements in an individual with a collicular lesion. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 28 (2006) 145-166
61. Simion F., Valenza E., and Umilta C. Inhibition of return in newborns is temporo-nasal asymmetrical. Infant Behavior and Development 18 (1995) 189-194
62. Snyder J.J., and Chatterjee A. The frontal cortex and exogenous attentional orienting. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18 (2006) 1913-1923
63. Snyder J.J., and Kingstone A. Inhibition of return and visual search: How many separate loci are inhibited?. Perception and Psychophysics 62 (2000) 452-458
64. Snyder J.J., and Kingstone A. Inhibition of return at multiple locations and its impact on visual search. Visual Cognition 15 (2007) 238-256
65. Snyder J.J., Schmidt W.C., and Kingstone A. Attentional momentum does not underlie the inhibition of return effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27 (2001) 1420-1432
66. Spalek T.M. A direct assessment of the expectation in inhibition of return. Psychological Science 19 (2007) 783-787
67. Spalek T.M., and Hammad S. Supporting the attentional momentum view of IOR: Is attention biased to go right?. Perception and Psychophysics 66 (2004) 219-233
68. Spalek T.M., and Hammad S. The left-to-right bias in inhibition of return is due to the direction of reading. Psychological Science 16 (2005) 15-18
69. Spence C., Lloyd D., McGlone F., Nicholls M.E.R., and Driver J. Inhibition of return is supramodal: A demonstration between all possible pairings of vision, touch, and audition. Experimental Brain Research 134 (2000) 42-48
70. Tassinari G., and Berlucchi G. Sensory and attentional components of slowing of manual reaction time to non-fixated visual targets by ipsilateral primes. Vision Research 33 (1993) 1525-1534
71. Tassinari G., and Berlucchi G. Covert orienting to non-informative cues: Reaction time studies. Behavioural Brain Research 71 (1995) 101-112
72. Tassinari G., Biscaldi M., Marzi C., and Berlucchi G. Ipsilateral inhibition and contralateral facilitation of simple reaction time to non-foveal visual targets from non-informative visual cues. Acta Psychologica 70 (1989) 267-291
73. Taylor T.L., and Klein R.M. On the causes and effects of inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 5 (1998) 625-643
74. Taylor T.L., and Klein R.M. Visual and motor effects in inhibition of return. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26 (2000) 1639-1656
75. Tipper C., and Kingstone A. Is inhibition of return a reflexive effect?. Cognition 97 (2005) B55-B62
76. Tipper S.P. The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 37 A (1985) 571-590
77. Tipper S.P., Driver J., and Weaver B. Object-centered inhibition of return of visual attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 43 A (1991) 289-298
78. Tipper S.P., Jordan H., and Weaver B. Scene-based and object-centered inhibition of return: Evidence for dual orienting mechanisms. Perception and Psychophysics 61 (1999) 50-60
79. Tipper S.P., Rafal R., Reuter-Lorenz P.A., Starrveldt Y., Ro T., Egly R., et al. Object-based facilitation and inhibition from visual orienting in the human split-brain. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 23 (1997) 1522-1532
80. Tipper S.P., Weaver B., Jerreat L.M., and Burak A.L. Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20 (1994) 478-499
81. Tipper S.P., Weaver B., and Watson F.L. Inhibition of return to successively cued spatial locations: Commentary on Pratt and Abrams (1995). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 22 (1996) 1289-1293
82. Treisman A., and Gelade G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology 12 (1980) 97-136
83. Wilson D.E., Castel A.D., and Pratt J. Long-term inhibition of return for spatial locations: Evidence for a memory retrieval account. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 59 A (2006) 2135-2147