Inhibition of return: Unraveling a paradox

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 957-963

  Birmingham, Elina ^a   Visser, Troy A W ^a   Snyder, Janice J ^a   Kingstone, Alan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 37349073221     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194128     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. BIRMINGHAM, E., & PRATT, J. (2005). Examining inhibition of return with onset and offset cues in the multiple-cuing paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 118, 101-121.
2. CASTEL, A. D., PRATT, J., CHASTEEN, A. L., & SCIALFA, C. T. (2005). Examining task difficulty and the time course of inhibition of return: Detecting perceptually degraded targets. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 90-98.
3. CASTEL, A. D., PRATT, J., & CRAIK, R I. M. (2003). The role of spatial working memory in inhibition of return: Evidence from divided attention tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 970-981.
4. DANZIGER, S., KINGSTONE, A., & SNYDER, J. J. (1998). Inhibition of return to successively stimulated locations in a sequential visual search paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1467-1475.
5. GIBSON, B. S., & EGETH, H. (1994). Inhibition of return to object-based and environment-based locations. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 323-339.
6. KLEIN, R. [M.] (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature, 334, 430-431.
7. KLEIN, R. M., & MACINNES, W. J. (1999). Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science, 10, 346-352.
8. LUPIÁÑEZ, J., MILLIKEN, B., SOLANO, C., WEAVER, B., & TIPPER, S. P. (2001). On the strategic modulation of the time course of facilitation and inhibition of return. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 753-773.
9. MAYLOR, E. A. (1985). Facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 189-204). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. MILLIKEN, B., LUPIÁÑEZ, J., ROBERTS, M., & STEVANOVSKI, B. (2003). Orienting in space and time: Joint contributions to exogenous spatial cuing effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 877-883.
11. MONDOR, T. A. (1999). Predictability of the cue-target relation and the time-course of auditory inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1501-1509.
12. PAUL, M. A., & TIPPER, S. P. (2003). Object-based representations facilitate memory for inhibitory processes. Experimental Brain Research, 148, 283-289.
13. POSNER, M. I., & COHEN, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. POSNER, M. I., RAFAL, R. D., CHOATE, L. S., & VAUGHAN, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 211-228.
15. PRATT, J., ADAM, J., & MCAULIFFE, J. (1998). The spatial relationship between cues and targets mediates inhibition of return. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52, 213-216.
16. REUTER-LORENZ, P. A., JHA, A. P., & ROSENQUIST, J. N. (1996). What is inhibited in inhibition of return. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 367-378.
17. SAPIR, A., SOROKER, N., BERGER, A., & HENIK, A. (1999). Inhibition of return in spatial attention: Direct evidence for collicular generation. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 1053-1054.
18. SNYDER, J. J., & KINGSTONE, A. (2000). Inhibition of return and visual search: How many separate loci are inhibited? Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 452-458.
19. SNYDER, J. J., & KINGSTONE, A. (in press). Inhibition of return at multiple locations and its impact on visual search. Visual Cognition.