Inhibition of return at multiple locations and its impact on visual search

Visual Cognition

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 238-256

  Snyder, Janice J ^a   Kingstone, Alan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE FIXATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 33847214546     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: 14640716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506280600724892     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Abrams, R. A. and Pratt, J. (1996) Spatially diffuse inhibition affects multiple locations: A reply to Tipper, Weaver, and Watson (1996). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, pp. 1294-1298.
2. Danziger, S., Kingstone, A. and Snyder, J. J. (1998) Inhibition of return to successively stimulated locations in a sequential visual search paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, pp. 1467-1475.
3. Hunt, A. and Kingstone, A. (2003) Inhibition of return: Dissociating attentional and oculomotor components. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, pp. 1068-1074.
4. Huynh, H. and Feldt, L. S. (1970) Conditions under which mean square ratios in repeated measurements designs have exact F-distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65, pp. 1582-1589.
5. Kingstone, A., Smilek, D., Birmingham, E., Cameron, D. and Bischof, W. F. (2005) Cognitive ethology: Giving real life to attention research. Measuring the mind: Speed, control and age, pp. 341-358. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
6. Kingstone, A., Smilek, D. and Eastwood, J. D. (2006) Cognitive ethology: A new approach for studying human attention.
7. Kingstone, A., Smilek, D., Ristic, J., Friesen, C. K. and Eastwood, J. D. (2003) Attention researchers! It's time to take a look at the real world. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, pp. 176-180.
8. Klein, R. (1988) Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature, 334, pp. 430-431.
9. Klein, R. M. and MacInnes, W. J. (1999) Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science, 10, pp. 346-352.
10. Müller, H. J. and von Mühlenen, A. (2000) Probing distractor inhibition in visual search: Inhibition of return. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, pp. 1591-1605.
11. Ogawa, H., Takeda, Y. and Yagi, A. (2002) Inhibitory tagging on randomly moving objects. Psychological Science, 13, pp. 125-129.
12. Posner, M. I. (1980) Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, pp. 3-25.
13. Posner, M. I. and Cohen, Y. (1984) Components of visual orienting. Attention and performance X: Control of language processes, pp. 531-556. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, Hillsdale, NJ
14. Posner, M. I., Rafal, R. D., Choate, L. S. and Vaughan, J. (1985) Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, pp. 211-228.
15. Pratt, J. and Abrams, R. A. (1995) Inhibition of return to successively cued spatial locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, pp. 1343-1353.
16. Rafal, R., Davies, J. and Lauder, J. (2006) Inhibitory tagging at subsequently fixated locations: Generation of "inhibition of return" without saccade inhibition. Visual Cognition, 13, pp. 308-323.
17. Sapir, A., Hayes, A., Henik, A., Danziger, S. and Rafal, R. (2004) Parietal lobe lesions disrupt saccadic remapping of inhibitory location tagging. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, pp. 503-509.
18. Smilek, D., Birmingham, E., Cameron, D., Bischof, W. F. and Kingstone, A. (2006) Cognitive ethology and exploring attention in real world scenes. Brain Research, 1080, pp. 101-119.
19. Snyder, J. J. and Kingstone, A. (2000) Inhibition of return and visual search: How many separate loci are inhibited?. Perception and Psychophysics, 62, pp. 452-458.
20. Snyder, J. J. and Kingstone, A. (2001) Inhibition of return at multiple locations: When you see it and when you don't. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, pp. 1221-1237.
21. Takeda, Y. and Yagi, A. (2000) Inhibitory tagging in visual search can be found if search stimuli remain visible. Perception and Psychophysics, 62, pp. 927-934.
22. Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B. and Watson, F. L. (1996) Inhibition of return to successively cued spatial locations: Commentary on Pratt and Abrams (1995). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, pp. 1289-1293.
23. Treisman, A. and Gelade, G. (1980) A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, pp. 97-136.
24. Watson, D. G. and Humphreys, G. W. (1997) Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition in selection. Journal of Experimental Review, 104, pp. 90-122.
25. Watson, D. G. and Humphreys, G. W. (1998) Visual marking of moving objects: A role for top-down feature-based inhibition in selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, pp. 946-962.
26. Weaver, B., Lupiáñez, J. and Watson, F. (1998) The effects of practice on object-based, location-based, and static-display inhibition of return. Perception and Psychophysics, 60, pp. 993-1003.
27. Yantis, S. and Johnson, D. N. (1990) Mechanisms of attentional priority. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16:4, pp. 812-825.
28. Yantis, S. and Jones, E. (1991) Mechanisms of attentional selection: Temporally modulated priority tags. Perception and Psychophysics, 50, pp. 166-178.