Long-term inhibition of return for spatial locations: Evidence for a memory retrieval account

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 59, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 2135-2147

  Wilson, Daryl E ^a,d   Castel, Alan D ^b   Pratt, Jay ^c  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^d QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MEMORY; REACTION TIME; TIME;

ADULT; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MEMORY; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33750903581     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210500481569     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Briand, K. A., Larrison, A. L., & Sereno, A. B. (2000). Inhibition of return in manual and saccadic response systems. Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 1512-1524.
2. Castel, A. D., Chasteen, A. L., Scialfa, C. T., & Pratt, J. (2003). Adult age differences in the time course of inhibition of return. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 58, 256-259.
3. Coward, R. S., Poliakoff, E., O'Boyle, D. J., & Lowe, C. (2004). The contribution of non-ocular response inhibition to visual inhibition of return. Experimental Brain Research, 155, 124-128.
4. Dodd, M. D. (2005). Inhibition of return with multiple shifts of attention. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
5. Kingstone, A., & Pratt, J. (1999). Inhibition of return is composed of attentional and oculomotor processes. Perception & Psychophysics, 61(6), 1046-1054.
6. Klein, R. M., Castel, A. D., & Pratt, J. (in press). The effects of memory load on the timecourse of inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
7. Lupiáñez, J., Milán, E. G., Tornay, F., Madrid, E., & Tudela, P. (1997). Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks?: Yes, it does, but later. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1241-1254.
8. Maylor, E. (1985). Facilitatory and inhibitory component of orienting in visual space. In M. I. Posner & B. B. Morin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 189-204). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
9. Maylor, E. A., & Hockey, G. R. J. (1985). Inhibitory component of externally controlled covert orienting in visual space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 777-787.
10. McAuliffe, J., & Pratt, J. (2005). The effect of cue duration and inter-stimulus interval in covert orienting of visual attention. Psychological Research, 69, 285-291.
11. Milliken, B., Tipper, S. P., Houghton, G., & Lupiáñez, J. (2000). Attending, ignoring, and repetition: On the relation between negative priming and inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1280-1296.
12. Morgan, H. M., Paul, M. A., & Tipper, S. P. (2005). Inhibition of return can be associated with object identity but not with object category. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, 499-520.
13. Neill, W. T. (1977). Inhibition and facilitation processes in selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 444-450.
14. Neill, W. T., & Valdes, L. A. (1992). Persistence of negative priming: Steady-state or decay? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 565-576.
15. Neill, W. T., Valdes, L. A., Terry, K. M., & Gorfein, D. S. (1992). Persistence of negative priming: II. Evidence for episodic trace retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 993-1000.
16. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. A. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouman & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X (pp. 531-556). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
17. Posner, M. I., Rafal, R. D., Choate, L. S., & Vaughan, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 211-228.
18. Pratt, J., & Castel, A. D. (2001). Responding to feature or location: A re-examination of inhibition of return and facilitation of return. Vision Research, 41, 3903-3908.
19. Samuel, A. G., & Kat, D. (2003). Inhibition of return: A graphical meta-analysis of its time course and an empirical test of its temporal and spatial properties. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 897-906.
20. Spalek, T. M., & Hammad, S. (2004). Supporting the attentional momentum view of inhibition of return: Is attention biased to go right? Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 219-233.
21. Spalek, T. M., & Hammad, S. (2005). The left-to-right bias in inhibition of return is due to the direction of reading. Psychological Science, 16, 15-18.
22. Tanaka, Y., & Shimojo, S. (1996). Location vs. feature: Reaction time reveals dissociation between two visual functions. Vision Research, 36, 2125-2140.
23. Taylor, T. L., & Klein, R. M. (2000). Visual and motor effects in inhibition of return. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1639-1656.
24. Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 571-590.
25. Tipper, S. P. (2001). Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 321-343.
26. Tipper, S. P., Grison, S., & Kessler, K. (2003). Long-term inhibition of return of attention. Psychological Science, 14, 19-25.
27. Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., Cameron, S., Brehaut, J. C., & Bastedo, J. (1991). Inhibitorymechanisms of attention in identification and localization tasks: Time course and disruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 681-692.