Promoting Novelty in Vision: Inhibition of Return Modulates Perceptual-Level Processing

Psychological Science

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 157-161

  Handy, Todd C ^a   Jha, Amishi P ^a   Mangun, George R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040688416     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00124     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Abrams, R.A., & Dobkin, R.S. (1994). Inhibition of return: Effects of attentional cuing on eye movement latencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 467-477.
2. Chelazzi, L., Biscaldi, M., Corbetta, M., Peru, A., Tassinari, G., & Berlucchi, G. (1995). Oculomotor activity and visual spatial attention. Behavioural Brain Research, 71, 81-88.
3. Downing, C.J. (1988). Expectancy and visual-spatial attention: Effects on perceptual quality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 188-202.
4. Gibson, B.S., & Egeth, H. (1994). Inhibition and disinhibition of return: Evidence from temporal order judgments. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 669-680.
5. Handy, T.C., Kingstone, A., & Mangun, G.R. (1996). Spatial distribution of visual attention: Perceptual sensitivity and response latency. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 613-627.
6. Klein, R.M., Schmidt, W.C., & Müller, H.K. (1998). Disinhibition of return: Unnecessary and unlikely. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 862-872.
7. Klein, R.M., & Taylor, T.L. (1994). Categories of cognitive inhibition with reference to attention. In D. Dagenbach & T.H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 113-150). San Diego: Academic Press.
8. Luck, S.J., Hillyard, S.A., Mouloua, M., Woldorff, M.G., Clark, V.P., & Hawkins, H.L. (1994). Effects of spatial cuing on luminance detectability: Psychophysical and electrophysiological evidence for early selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 887-904.
9. Macmillan, N.A., & Creelman, C.D. (1991). Detection theory: A user's guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Macmillan, N.A., & Creelman, C.D. (1996). Triangles in ROC space: History and theory of "nonparametric" measures of sensitivity and response bias. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 164-170.
11. Maylor, E. (1985). Facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space. In M.I. Posner & B.B. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 189-204). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Müller, H.J., & von Mühlenen, A. (1996). Attentional tracking and inhibition of return in dynamic displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 224-249.
13. O'Donnell, C., & Pratt, J. (1996). Inhibition of return along the path of attention. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 386-392.
14. Posner, M.I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D.G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Posner, M.I., Rafal, R.D., Choate, L., & Vaughn, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 211-228.
16. Pratt, J. (1995). Inhibition of return in a discrimination task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 117-120.
17. Pratt, J., Kingstone, A., & Khoe, W. (1997). Inhibition of return to location- and identity-based choice decision tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 964-971.
18. Rafal, R.D. (1996). Visual attention: Converging operations from neurology and psychology. In A.F. Kramer, M.G.H. Coles, & G.D. Logan (Eds.), Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 139-192). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
19. Rafal, R.D., Egly, R., & Rhodes, D. (1994). Effects of inhibition of return on voluntary and visually guided saccades. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 284-300.
20. Rafal, R.D., & Henik, A. (1994). The neurology of inhibition: Integrating controlled and automatic processes. In D. Dagenbach & T.H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 1-52). San Diego: Academic Press.
21. Reinitz, M.T. (1990). Effects of spatially directed attention on visual encoding. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 497-505.
22. Reuter-Lorenz, P.A., Jha, A.P., & Rosenquist, J.N. (1996). What is inhibited in inhibition of return? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 367-378.
23. Santee, J.L., & Egeth, H.E. (1982). Do reaction time and accuracy measure the same aspects of letter recognition? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 489-501.
24. Schmidt, W.C. (1996). Inhibition of return is not detected using illusory line motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 883-898.
25. Taylor, T.L., & Klein, R.M. (in press). On the causes and effects of inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
26. Terry, K.M., Valdes, L.A., & Neill, W.T. (1994). Does "inhibition of return" occur in discrimination tasks? Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 279-286.
27. Tipper, S.P., Weaver, B., Jeneat, L.M., & Burak, A.L. (1994). Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 478-499.