Inhibition of return interacts with the Simon effect: An omnibus analysis and its implications

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 64, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 318-327

  Ivanoff, Jason ^a   Klein, Raymond M ^a   Lupiáñez, Juan ^b  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME;

ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; CUES; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME;

EID: 0036481129     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03195794     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. ABRAMS, R. A., & DOBKIN, R. S. (1994). Inhibition of return: Effects of attentional cuing on eye movement latencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 467-477.
2. BROADBENT, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. Oxford: Pergamon.
3. DE JONG, R., LIANG, C.-C., & LAUBER, E. (1994) Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 731-750.
4. DIXON, P. (1998). Why scientists value p values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 390-396.
5. DIXON, P., & O'REILLY, T. (1999). Scientific versus statistical inference. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 133-149.
6. EIMER, M. (1998). The lateralized readiness potential as an on-line measure of central response activation processes. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 30, 146-156.
7. FUENTES, L. J., VIVAS, A. B., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1999). Inhibitory tagging of stimulus properties in inhibition of return: Effects on semantic priming and flanker interference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 149-164.
8. HANDY, T. C., JHA, A. P., & MANGUN, G. R. (1999). Promoting novelty in vision: Inhibition of return modulates perceptual-level processing. Psychological Science, 10, 157-161.
9. HOMMEL, B. (1993a). The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: Evidence for a temporal overlap. Psychological Research, 55, 280-290.
10. HOMMEL, B. (1993b). The role of attention for the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 55, 208-222.
11. HOMMEI, B. (1994). Spontaneous decay of response-code activation. Psychological Research, 56, 261-268.
12. IVANOFF, J., & KLEIN, R. M. (2001). The presence of a nonresponding effector increases inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 307-314.
13. IVANOFF, J., & PETERS, M. (2000). A shift of attention may be necessary, but it is not sufficient, for the generation of the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 64, 117-135.
14. KLEIN, R. M. (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature, 334, 430-431.
15. KLEIN, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 138-146.
16. KLEIN, R. M., & DICK, B. (in press). RSVP exploration of the temporal dynamics of reflexive attention shifts. Psychological Science.
17. KLEIN, R. M., SCHMIDT, W. C., & MüLLER, H. J. (1998). Disinhibition of return: Unnecessary and unlikely. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 862-872.
18. KLEIN, R. M., & TAYLOR, T. L. (1994). Categories of cognitive inhibition, with reference to attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 113-150). San Diego: Academic Press.
19. KORNBLUM, S., HASBROUCQ, T., & OSMAN, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility: A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
20. KORNBLUM, S., & LEE, J.-W. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility with relevant and irrelevant stimulus dimensions that do and do not overlap with the response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 855-875.
21. KORNBLUM, S., STEVENS, G. T., WHIPPLE, A., & REQUIN, J. (1999). The effects of irrelevant stimuli: 1. The time course of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response consistency effects with Stroop-like stimuli, Simon-like tasks, and their factorial combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 688-714.
22. LU, C.-H., & PROCTOR, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174-207.
23. LUPIÁÑEZ, J., MILÁN, E. G., TORNAY, F. J., MADRID, E., & TUDELA, P. (1997). Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks? Yes, it does, but later. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1241-1254.
24. LUPIÁÑEZ, J., & MILLIKEN, B. (1999). Inhibition of return and the attentional set for integrating versus differentiating information. Journal of General Psychology, 126, 392-418.
25. LUPIÁÑEZ, J., MILLIKEN, B., SOLANO, C., WEAVER, B., & TIPPER, S. P. (2001). On the strategic modulation of the time course of facilitation and inhibition of return. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 753-773.
26. LUPIÁÑEZ, J., & SOLANO, C. (1998). Inhibition of return in a color discrimination task: No interaction with the Simon effect. Cognitiva, 9, 195-205.
27. LUPIÁÑEZ, J., TUDELA, P., & RUEDA, C. (1999). Control inhibitorio en la orientacion atencional: Un revision sobre la inhibicion de retorno [Inhibitory control in attentional orientation: A review about the inhibition of return]. Cognitiva, 11, 23-44. [Abstract in English]
28. LUPIÁÑEZ, J., WEAVER, B., TIPPER, S. P., & MADRID, E. (2001). The effects of practice on cuing effects in detection and discrimination tasks. Psicológica, 22, 1-23.
29. MCDONALD, J. J., WARD, L. M., & KIEHL, K. A. (1999). An event-related brain potential study of inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1411-1423.
30. MOURET, I., & HASBROUCQ, T. (2000). The chronometry of single neuron activity: Testing discrete versus continuous models of information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 1622-1638.
31. POSNER, M. [I.] (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
32. POSNER, M. I., & COHEN, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. POSNER, M. L. RAFAL, R. D., CHOATE, L. S., & VAUGHAN, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 211-228.
34. PRATT, J., KINGSTONE, A., & KHOE, W. (1997). Inhibition of return in location-and identity-based choice decision tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 964-971.
35. PROCTOR, R. W., LU, C.-H., & VAN ZANDT, T. (1992). Enhancement of the Simon effect by response precuing. Acta Psychologica, 74, 53-74.
36. SHELIGA, B. M., CRAIGHERO, L., RIGGIO, L., & RIZZOLATTI, G. (1997). Effects of spatial attention on directional manual and ocular responses. Experimental Brain Research, 114, 339-351.
37. STERNBERG, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extension of Donders' method. In W. G. Koster (Ed.), Attention and performance II: Proceedings of the Donders centenary symposium on reaction time. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
38. STOFFER, T. H., & UMILTÀ, C. (1997). Spatial stimulus coding and the focus of attention in S-R compatibility and the Simon effect. In B. Hommel, & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in S-R compatibility (pp. 181-208). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
39. STOFFER, T. H., & YAKIN, A. R. (1994). The functional role of attention for spatial coding in the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 56, 151-162.
40. TAYLOR, T. L., & KLEIN, R. M. (1998). On the causes and effects of inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 625-643.
41. TAYLOR, T. L., & KLEIN, R. M. (2000). Visual and motor effects in inhibition of return. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 1639-1656.
42. WICKELGREN, W. (1977). Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics. Acta Psychologica, 41, 67-85.
43. ZIMBA, L. D., & BRITO, C. F. (1995). Attention precuing and Simon effects: A test of the attention-coding account of the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 58, 102-118.