A direct assessment of the role of expectation in inhibition of return

Psychological Science

Volumn 18, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 783-787

  Spalek, Thomas M ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); ORIENTATION; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REACTION TIME; STUDENT; VISION;

ATTENTION; CUES; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); ORIENTATION; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; REACTION TIME; STUDENTS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 34548240921     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01979.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Handy, T.C., Jha, A.P. Mangun, G.R. (1999). Promoting novelty in vision: Inhibition of return modulates perceptual-level processing. Psychological Science, 10, 157 161.
2. Hogben, J.H. Di Lollo, V. (1985). Suppression of visible persistence in apparent motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 450 460.
3. Jeffries, L.N., Wright, R.D. Di Lollo, V. (2005). Inhibition of return to an occluded object depends on expectation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 1224 1233.
4. Kubovy, M. Psotka, J. (1976). The predominance of seven and the apparent spontaneity of numerical choices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 291 294.
5. Posner, M.I. Cohen, Y.A. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma D.G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance (Vol. 10, pp. 531 556). Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
6. Posner, M.I., Rafal, R.D., Choate, L.S. Vaughan, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 211 228.
7. Pratt, J., Spalek, T.M. Bradshaw, F. (1999). The time to detect targets at inhibited and noninhibited locations: Preliminary evidence for attentional momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 730 746.
8. Psotka, J. (1978). Perceptual processes that may create stick figures and balance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 101 111.
9. Reuter-Lorenz, P.A., Jha, A.P. Rosenquist, J.N. (1996). What is inhibited in inhibition of return? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 367 378.
10. Sillito, A.M. (1992). GABA mediated inhibitory processes in the function of the geniculo-striate system. Progress in Brain Research, 90, 349 384.
11. Sillito, A.M., Jones, H.E., Gerstein, G.L. West, D.C. (1994). Feature-linked synchronization of thalamic relay cell firing induced by feedback from the visual cortex. Nature, 369, 479 482.
12. Spalek, T.M. Di Lollo, V. (in press). The time required for perceptual (non-motoric) processing in IOR. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
13. Spalek, T.M. Hammad, S. (2004). Supporting the attentional momentum view of inhibition of return: Is attention biased to go right? Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 219 233.
14. Spalek, T.M. Hammad, S. (2005). The left-to-right bias in inhibition of return is due to the direction of reading. Psychological Science, 16, 15 18.
15. Taylor, T.L. Klein, R.M. (1998). On the causes and effects of inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 625 643.