The effect of content knowledge on pedagogical content knowledge: the case of teaching phases of matters

Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 633-645

  Özden, Mustafa ^a  

^a ADIYAMAN UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Content knowledge; Pedagogical content knowledge; Phases of

Indexed keywords

EID: 72549090336     PISSN: 13030485     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Adams, P. E., & Krockover, G. H. (1997). Beginning science teacher cognition and its origin in the preservice secondary science teacher program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34 (6), 633-653.
2. Anderson, C. W., & Smith, E. L. (1987). Teaching science. In V. RichardsonKoehler (Ed.), Educators' handbook, A research perspective (pp. 84-111). New York: Longman.
3. Andersson, B. (1990). Pupils' conceptions of matter and its transformations (age 12 -16). Studies in Science Education, 18, 53-85.
4. Borko, H., Livingston, C., & Shavelson, R. J. (1990). Teachers' thinking about instruction. Remedial and Special Education, 11 (6), 40-50.
5. Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers' thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 255-296). New York: Macmillan.
6. Clermont, C. P., Borko, H., & Krajcik, J. S. (1994). Comparative study of the pedagogical content knowledge of experienced and novice chemical demonstrations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31 (4), 419-441.
7. Connelly, M. F., Clandinin, D. J., & He, M. F. (1997). Teacher personal practical knowledge on the professional knowledge landscape. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13 (1), 665-674.
8. De Jong, O. Ahtee, M., Goodwin A., Hatzinikita, V., & Koulaidis V. (1999). An international study of prospective teachers' initial teaching conceptions and concerns: The case of teaching 'combustion'. European Journal of Teacher Education, 22(1), 45-59.
9. De Jong, O. (2000). The teacher trainer as researcher: Exploring the initial pedagogical content concerns of prospective science teachers. European Journal of Teacher Education, 23,127-137
10. De Jong, O., & Van Driel, J. (2004). Exploring the development of student teachers' PCK of the multiple meanings of chemistry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2,477-491.
11. De Jong., O., Van Driel, J., & Verloop, N. (2005). Preservice teachers' pedagogical content knowledge of using particle models when teaching chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 947-964.
12. Even, R. (1.993). Subject-matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: Prospective secondary teachers and the function concept. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24 (2), 94-116.
13. Frederik, I., Van der Valk, T., Leite, L., & Thorén, I. (1999). Pre-service physics teachers and conceptual difficulties on temperature and heat. European Journal of Teacher Education, 22 (1), 61-74.
14. Gess-Newsome, J., & Lederman, N. G. (1995). Biology teachers' perceptions of subject matter structure and its relationship to classroom practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32 (3), 301-325.
15. Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Secondary teachers knowledge and beliefs about subject matter and their impact on instruction. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 51-94). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
16. Halim, L., & Meerah, S. M. (2002). Science trainee teachers' pedagogical content knowledge and its influence on physics teaching. Research in Science & Technological Education, 20(2), 215-225.
17. Hashweh, M. Z. (1987). Effects of subject matter knowledge in the teaching of biology and physics. Teaching & Teacher Education, 3 (2), 109-120.
18. Hashweh, M. Z. (1996). Effects of science teachers' epistemological beliefs in teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33 (1), 47-263.
19. Hogan, T., Rabinowitz, M., & Craven, J. A. (2003). Representation in teaching. Inferences from research of expert and novice teachers. Educational Psychologist, 38 (4), 235-247.
20. Jones, A., & Moreland, J. (2004). Enhancing practicing primary school teachers' pedagogical content knowledge in technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14, 121-140.
21. Käpyläa M., Heikkinenb, J., & Asuntaa T. (2008). Influence of content knowledge on pedagogical content knowledge: The case of teaching photosynthesis and plant growth. International Journal of Science Education, 2008, 1-21.
22. Kaya, O.N (2008). The nature of relationships among the components of pedagogical content knowledge of preservice science teachers: 'Ozone layer depletion' as an example. International Journal of Science Education, 1-28.
23. Lederman, N. G., & Niess, M. L. (2001). An attempt to anchor our moving targets. School Science and Mathematics, 101 (2), 50-57.
24. Loughran,J.,Milroy,P.,Berry,A.Gunstone,R.,&Mulhall,P.(2001). Documentingscienceteachers'pedagogicalcontentknowledgethroughPaP-eRs. ResearchinScienceEducation,31,289-307.(Pubitemid33810158)
25. Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2004). In search of pedagogical content knowledge in science: Developing ways in articulating and documenting professional practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41 (4), 370-391.
26. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95-132). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
27. Mapolelo, D. C. (1999). Do pre-service primary teachers who excel in mathematics become good mathematics teachers? Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 715-725.
28. Marland, P., & Osborne, B. (1990). Classroom theory, thinking and action. Teaching and Teacher Education, 6(1), 93-109.
29. Mason, C. L. (1999). The TRIAD approach: A concensus for science teaching and learning. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 277-292). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
30. Nakhleh, M. B., Samarapungavan, A., & Saglam, Y. (2005). Middle school students' beliefs about matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42 (5), 581. (Pubitemid 40750383)
31. Nakiboglu, C., & Karakoç, Ö. (2005). The forth knowledge domain a teacher should have: The pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 5(1), 201-206.
32. Niess, M. L., & Scholz, J. (1999). Incorporating subject matter specific teaching strategies into secondary science teacher preparation. In J. Gess-Newsome, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 257-276). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
33. Oldham, E., Van derVaIk, T., Broekman, H., & Berenson, S. (1999). Beginning preservice teachers' approaches to teaching the area concept: Identifying tendencies towards realistic, structuralist, mechanist or empiricist mathematics education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 22(1), 23-43.
34. Putnam, R. T. (1987). Structuring and adjusting content for students. A study of live and simulated tutoring of addition. American Educational Research Journal, 24 (1), 13-48.
35. Ritchie, S. M. (1999). The craft of intervention: A personal practical theory for the teacher's within group interactions. Science Education, 83 (2), 213-231.
36. Schempp, P. G., Manross, D., Tan, S. K. S., & Fincher, M. D. (1998). Subject expertise and teachers' knowledge. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 17(3), 342-356.
37. Sanders, L., Borko, H., & Lockard, J. (1993). Secondary science teachers' knowledge base when teaching science courses in and out of their area of certification. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30 (7), 723-736.
38. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14.
39. Shulman, L. S. (1.987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
40. Smith, D. C., & Neale, D. C. (1989). The construction of subject matter knowledge in primary science teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 5(1), 1-20.
41. Stacey, K., Helme, S., Steinle, V., Baturo, A., Irwin, K., & Bana, J. (2001). Preservice teachers' knowledge of difficulties in decimal numeration. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4 (3), 205-225.
42. Stavy, R. (1990). Childrens conception of changes in the state of matter - from liquid (or solid) to gas. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(3), 247-266.
43. Stavy, R., & Stachel, D. (1985). Children's conception of changes in the state of matter: From solid to liquid. Archives de Psychologie, 53, 331-344.
44. Tobin, K., Tippins, D., & Gallard, A. (1994). Research on instructional strategies for teaching science. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 45-93). New York: Macmillan.
45. Uşak, M. (2005). Prospective elementary science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge about flowering plants. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Gazi University, Ankara.
46. Van der Valk, T., & Broekman, H. (1999). The lesson preparation method: A way of investigating pre-service teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. European Journal of Teacher Education, 22(1), 11-22.
47. VanDriel,J.H.Verloop,N.,&DeVos,W.(1998). Developingscienceteachers'pedagogicalcontentknowledge. JournalofResearchinScienceTeaching,35(6),673-695.(Pubitemid128459028)
48. Van Driel, J., De Jong, O., & Verloop, N. (2002). The development of pre-service chemistry teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Science Education, 86, 572-590. (Pubitemid 37230320)
49. Zembal-Saul, C. Starr, M. L., & Krajcik, J. S. (1999). Constructing a framework for elementary science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 237-256). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher.