Traits of effective teachers

Arts Education Policy Review

Volumn 107, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 23-29

  Polk, Jeremy A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 71549126496     PISSN: 10632913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/AEPR.107.4.23-29     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Bauer, W. I., and M. H. Berg. 2001. Influences on instrumental music teaching. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education 150:53-66.
2. Bauer, W. I., S. Reese, and P. A. McAllister. 2003. Transforming music teaching via technology: The role of professional development. Journal of Research in Music Education 51:289-302.
3. Brekelmans, M., A. Holvast, and J. Tartwijk. 1992. Changes in teacher communication styles during the professional career. Journal of Classroom Interaction 27: 13-22.
4. Colwell, R. 1996. Professional development residency program. Quarterly Journal of Music Teaching and Learning 72 (4): 76-90.
5. Conkling, S. W. 2003. Uncovering preservice music teachers’ reflective thinking: Making sense of learning to teach. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education 155:11-23.
6. Dickey, M. R. 1991. A comparison of verbal instruction and nonverbal teacher-student modeling in instrumental ensembles. Journal of Research in Music Education 39:132-42.
7. Dickey, M. R. 1992. A review of research on modeling in music teaching and learning. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education 113:27-40.
8. Dildy, P. 1982. Improving student achievement by appropriate teacher inservice training: Utilizing program for effective teaching PET. Education 103:132-38.
9. Erdle, S., H. G. Murray, and J. P. Rushton. 1985. Personality, classroom behavior, and student ratings of college teaching effectiveness: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology 77:394-407.
10. Goldhaber, D. D., and D. J. Brewer. 2000. Does teacher certification matter? High school teacher certification status and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 22 (2): 129-45.
11. Goolsby, T. W. 1996. Time use in instrumental rehearsals: A comparison of experienced, novice, and student teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education 44:286-303.
12. Goolsby, T. W. 1997. Verbal instruction in instrumental rehearsals: A comparison of three career levels and preservice teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education 45:21-40.
13. Guyton, E., and E. Farokhi. 1987. Relationships among academic performance, basic skills, subject matter knowledge, and teaching skills of teacher education graduates. Journal of Teacher Education 38 (5): 37-42.
14. Hamann, D. L., D. S. Baker, P. A. McAllister, and W. I. Bauer. 2000.A Factors affecting university music students’ perceptions of lesson quality and teaching effectiveness. Journal of Research in Music Education 48:102-13.
15. Hamann, D. L., N. Lineburgh, and S. Paul. 1998. Teaching effectiveness and social skill development. Journal of Research in Music Education 46:87-101.
16. Henry, W. 2001. Music teacher education and the professional development school. Journal of Music Teacher Education 10 (2): 23-28.
17. Henry, W., and D. A. Rohwer. 2004. University teachers’ perceptions of requisite skills and characteristics of effective music teachers. Journal of Music Teacher Education 13 (2): 18-27.
18. Hewitt, M. P. 2001. The effect of modeling, self-evaluation, and self-listening on junior high instrumentalists’ music performance and practice attitude. Journal of Research in Music Education 49:307-22.
19. Jones, J. 1989. Students’ ratings of teacher personality and teaching competence. Higher Education 18:551-58.
20. Krueger, R. J. 1972. A predictive investigation of personality and music teaching success. Council for Research in Music Education Bulletin 30:11-17.
21. Krueger, T. 1997. Oral communication skills necessary for successful teaching: The students’ perspective. Educational Research Quarterly 21 (2): 13-26.
22. Langer, J. A. 2000. Excellence in English in middle and high school: How teachers’ professional lives support student achievement. American Educational Research Journal 37 (2): 397-439.
23. Levy, J., T. Wubbels, and M. Brekelmans. 1992. Student and teacher characteristics and perceptions of teacher communication style. Journal of Classroom Interaction 27:23-29.
24. Linklater, F. 1997. Effects of audio- and videotape models on performance achievement of beginning clarinetists. Journal of Research in Music Education 45:402-14.
25. Madsen, K., 2003. The effect of accuracy of instruction, teacher delivery, and student attentiveness on musicians’ evaluation of teacher effectiveness. Journal of Research in Music Education 51:38-51.
26. Madsen, C. K., J. M. Standley, and J. W. Cassidy. 1989. Demonstration and recognition of high and low contrasts in teacher intensity. Journal of Research in Music Education 37:85-92.
27. Mariage, T. V., and M. A. Garmon. 2003. A case of educational change: Improving student achievement through a school- university partnership. Remedial and Special Education 24 (4): 215-34.
28. Murray, H. G., J. P. Rushton, and S. V. Paunonen. 1990. Teacher personality traits and student instructional ratings in six types of university courses. Journal of Educational Psychology 82:250-61.
29. Nagle, R. J. 1976. Learning through modeling in the classroom. Teachers College Record 77:631-37.
30. Rosenthal, R. K. 1984. The relative effects of guided model, model only, guide only, and practice only treatments on the accuracy of advanced instrumentalists’ musical performance. Journal of Research in Music Education 32:265-73.
31. Sang, R. C. 1987. A study of the relationship between instrumental music teachers’ modeling skills and pupil performance behaviors. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education 91:155-59.
32. Schmidt, C. P., B. E. Lewis, and M. J. KurpiusBrock. 1991. Relationships between teacher personality and ratings of applied music teaching behavior. Contributions to Music Education 18:20-35.
33. Shockley, R. P. 1982. Advanced group instruction: Some implications for teacher training. College Music Symposium 22 (2): 103-9.
34. Sidelinger, R., and J. McCroskey. 1997. Communication correlates of teacher clarity in the college classroom. Communication Research Reports 14 (1): 1-10.
35. Smith, M. V., and P. Haack. 2000. The long view of lifelong learning. Music Educators Journal 87 (3): 28-33.
36. Southall, J. K. 2003. Twelve ideas for professional excellence. Teaching Music 11 (1): 48-53.
37. Teachout, D. J. 1997. Preservice and experienced teachers’ opinions of skills and behaviors important to successful music teaching. Journal of Research in Music Education 45:41-50.
38. Teachout, D. J. 2001. The relationship between personality and the teaching effectiveness of music student teachers. Psychology of Music 29:179-92.
39. Trimble, S. 2003. Research-based classroom practices and student achievement. Middle School Journal 35 (1): 52-58.
40. Wubbenhorst, T. M. 1991. Music educators’ personality types as measured by the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Contributions to Music Education 18:7-19.
41. Yarbrough, C., and K. Madsen. 1998. The evaluation of teaching in choral rehearsals. Journal of Research in Music Education 46:469-81.
42. Yarbrough, C., H. Price, and C. Hendel. 1994. The effect of sequential patterns and modes of presentation on the evaluation of music teaching. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education 120:33-45.