Factors Affecting University Music Students’ Perceptions of Lesson Quality and Teaching Effectiveness

Journal of Research in Music Education

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 102-113

  Hamann, Donald L ^a   Baker, Dawn S ^b   McAllister, Peter A ^c   Bauer, William I ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b Ball State University ^*  (United States)

^c BALL STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990394435     PISSN: 00224294     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3345569     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Brophy, T. (1993). Evaluation of music educators: Towards defining an appropriate instrument. ERIC ED 375029.
2. Dickey, M. R. (1992). A review of research on modeling in music teaching and learning. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 113, 27-40.
3. Duke, R. A., & Blackman, M. D. (1991). The relationship between observers’ recorded teacher behavior and evaluation of music instruction. Journal of Research in Music Education, 39, 290-297.
4. Hamann, D. L. (1995, May). Pre-service teachers’ teaching effectiveness and social skill development. Southeastern Journal of Music Education, 7, 1-12.
5. Hamann, D. L., Lineburgh, N., & Paul, S. J. (1998). Teaching effectiveness and social skill development. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 87-101.
6. Hendel, C. (1995). Behavioral characteristics and instructional patterns of selected music teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 43, 182-203.
7. Madsen, C. K., & Geringer, J. M. (1989). The relationship of teacher “on task” to intensity and effective teaching. Canadian Music Educator, 30, 87-94.
8. Madsen, C. K., Standley, J. M., Byo, J. L., & Cassidy, J. W. (1992). Assessment of effective teaching by instrumental music student teachers and experts. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 10 (2), 20-24.
9. Madsen, C. K., Standley, J. M., & Cassidy, J. W. (1989). Demonstration and recognition of high and low contrasts in teacher intensity. Journal of Research in Music Education, 37, 85-92.
10. Marsh, H. W., & Roche, L. (1993). The use of students’ evaluations and an individually structured intervention to enhance university teaching effectiveness. American Educational Research Journal, 30 (1), 217-251.
11. Price, H. E. (1992). Sequential patterns of music instruction and learning to use them. Journal of Research in Music Education, 40, 14-29.
12. Single, N. M. (1991). A summary of research-based principles of effective teaching. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 9 (2), 3-10.
13. Standley, J. M., & Madsen, C. K. (1991). An observation procedure to differentiate teaching experience and expertise in music education. Journal of Research in Music Education, 39, 5-11.
14. Taebel, D. K. (1990). An assessment of the classroom performance of music teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 38, 5-23.
15. Teachout, D. J. (1997). Preservice and experienced teachers’ opinions of skills and behaviors important to successful music teaching. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 41-50.
16. Yarbrough, C. (1975). Effect of magnitude of conducting behavior on students in selected mixed choruses. Journal of Research in Music Education, 23, 134-146.
17. Yarbrough, C., & Madsen, K. (1998). The evaluation of teaching in choral rehearsals. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 469-481.
18. Yarbrough, C., Price, H. E., & Hendel, C. (1994). The effect of sequential patterns and modes of presentation on the evaluation of music teaching. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 120, 33-45.