Four-year clinical performance and marginal analysis of pressed glass ceramic inlays luted with ormocer restorative vs. conventional luting composite

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 37, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 813-819

  Krämer, Norbert ^a   Reinelt, Christian ^b   Richter, Gert ^c   Frankenberger, Roland ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL CARL GUSTAV CARUS   (Germany)

^b University of Marburg ^*

^c PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Adhesives; Clinical trial; Glass ceramics; Ormocer; Resin composite

Indexed keywords

RESIN CEMENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL ETCHING; DENTAL SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CEMENTATION; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL ETCHING; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INLAYS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RESIN CEMENTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 70249092166     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Fuzzi M., and Rappelli G. Survival rate of ceramic inlays. Journal of Dentistry 26 (1998) 623-626
2. Hayashi M., and Yeung C.A. Ceramic inlays for restoring posterior teeth. Australian Dental Journal 49 (2004) 60-67
3. Manhart J., Chen H., Hamm G., and Hickel R. Buonocore memorial lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Operative Dentistry 29 (2004) 481-508
4. Blatz M. The clinical long-term success of ceramic restorations. Part I. Inlays and onlays. Practical Procedures and Aesthetic Dentistry 16 (2004) 622
5. Kramer N., Lohbauer U., and Frankenberger R. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations. American Journal of Dentistry 13 (2000) 60D-76D
6. Pallesen U., and van Dijken J.W. An 8-year evaluation of sintered ceramic and glass ceramic inlays processed by the Cerec CAD/CAM system. European Journal of Oral Sciences 108 (2000) 239-246
7. Posselt A., and Kerschbaum T. Longevity of 2328 chairside Cerec inlays and onlays. International Journal of Computerized Dentistry 6 (2003) 231-248
8. Reiss B. Clinical results of Cerec inlays in a dental practice over a period of 18 years. International Journal of Computerized Dentistry 9 (2006) 11-22
9. Sjogren G., Molin M., and van Dijken J.W. A 10-year prospective evaluation of CAD/CAM-manufactured (Cerec) ceramic inlays cemented with a chemically cured or dual-cured resin composite. International Journal of Prosthodontics 17 (2004) 241-246
10. Frankenberger R., Reinelt C., Petschelt A., and Krämer N. Operator vs. material influence on clinical outcome of bonded ceramic inlays. Dent Mater 25 (2009) 960-968
11. Hayashi M., Tsuchitani Y., Kawamura Y., Miura M., Takeshige F., and Ebisu S. Eight-year clinical evaluation of fired ceramic inlays. Operative Dentistry 25 (2000) 473-481
12. Manhart J., Chen H.Y., Neuerer P., Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A., and Hickel R. Three-year clinical evaluation of composite and ceramic inlays. American Journal of Dentistry 14 (2001) 95-99
13. Roulet J.F. Longevity of glass ceramic inlays and amalgam-results up to 6 years. Clinical Oral Investigations 1 (1997) 40-46
14. Felden A., Schmalz G., Federlin M., and Hiller K.A. Retrospective clinical investigation and survival analysis on ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns: results up to 7 years. Clinical Oral Investigations 2 (1998) 161-167
15. Frankenberger R., Lohbauer U., Schaible R.B., Nikolaenko S.A., and Naumann M. Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: marginal quality of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives versus self-etch cements. Dental Materials 24 (2008) 185-191
16. Hickel R., and Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 3 (2001) 45-64
17. Frankenberger R., Taschner M., Garcia-Godoy F., Petschelt A., and Krämer N. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after 12 years. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 10 (2008) 393-398
18. Frankenberger R., Krämer N., and Petschelt A. Technique sensitivity of dentin bonding: effect of application mistakes on bond strength and marginal adaptation. Operative Dentistry 25 (2000) 324-330
19. De Munck J., Van Landuyt K.L., Peumans M., Poitevin A., Lambrechts P., Braem M., et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. Journal of Dental Research 84 (2005) 118-132
20. Hikita K., Van Meerbeek B., De Munck J., Ikeda T., Van Landuyt K.L., Maida T., et al. Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin. Dental Materials 23 (2007) 71-80
21. Frankenberger R., and Tay F.R. Self-etch vs etch-and-rinse adhesives: effect of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restorations. Dental Materials 21 (2005) 397-412
22. Frankenberger R., Krämer N., Lohbauer U., Nikolaenko S.A., and Reich S.M. Marginal integrity: is the clinical performance of bonded restorations predictable in vitro?. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 9 Suppl. 1 (2007) 107-116
23. Krämer N., Ebert J., Petschelt A., and Frankenberger R. Ceramic inlays bonded with two adhesives after 4 years. Dental Materials 22 (2006) 13-21
24. Frankenberger R., Lohbauer U., Roggendorf M.J., Naumann M., and Taschner M. Selective enamel etching reconsidered: better than etch-and-rinse and self-etch?. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 10 (2008) 339-344
25. Fujitani M., Inokoshi S., and Hosoda H. Effect of acid etching on the dental pulp in adhesive composite restorations. International Dental Journal 42 (1992) 3-11
26. Hebling J., Giro E.M., and Costa C.A. Human pulp response after an adhesive system application in deep cavities. Journal of Dentistry 27 (1999) 557-564
27. Frankenberger R., Lohbauer U., Taschner M., Petschelt A., and Nikolaenko S.A. Adhesive luting revisited: influence of adhesive, temporary cement, cavity cleaning, and curing mode on internal dentin bond strength. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 9 Suppl. 2 (2007) 269-273
28. Baseren M. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid composite resin and ormocer-based tooth-colored restorative materials after several finishing and polishing procedures. Journal of Biomaterials Applications 19 (2004) 121-134
29. Bottenberg P., Jacquet W., Alaerts M., and Keulemans F. A prospective randomized clinical trial of one bis-GMA-based and two ormocer-based composite restorative systems in class II cavities: five-year results. Journal of Dentistry 37 (2009) 198-203