Adhesive luting revisited: Influence of adhesive, temporary cement, cavity cleaning, and curing mode on internal dentin bond strength

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 9, Issue , 2007, Pages 269-273

  Frankenberger, Roland ^a   Lohbauer, Ulrich ^a   Taschner, Michael ^a   Petschelt, Anselm ^a   Nikolaenko, Sergej A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^b KRASNOYARSK STATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Adhesive inlays; Dentin bonding; Etch and rinse; Microtensile bond strength

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT;

DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CURING LIGHT; DENTIN; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; TENSILE STRENGTH;

ADHESIVES; CURING LIGHTS, DENTAL; DENTAL BONDING; DENTIN; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 34248151371     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: 17579988     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a12217     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Schaible BR, Nikolaenko SA, Naumann M. Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: marginal quality of self-etch and etch-andrinse adhesives vs. self-etch cements. Dent Mater 2006;submitted.
2. Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Tay FR, Taschner M, Nikolaenko SA. Air-polishing powders differently affect dentin bonding. J Adhes Dent 2007; accepted for publication.
3. Frankenberger R, Pashley DH, Reich SM, Lohbauer U, Petschelt A, Tay FR. Characterisation of resin-dentine interfaces by compressive cyclic loading. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 2043-2052.
4. Frankenberger R, Petschelt A, Krämer N. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: clinical behavior. Oper Dent 2000; 25: 459-465.
5. Frankenberger R, Sindel J, Krämer N, Petschelt A. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays. Oper Dent 1999; 24: 147-155.
6. Fuzzi M, Rappelli G. Ceramic inlays: clinical assessment and survival rate. J Adhes Dent 1999; 1: 71-79.
7. Hayashi M, Tsubakimoto Y, Takeshige F, Ebisu S. Analysis of longitudinal marginal deterioration of ceramic inlays. Oper Dent 2004; 29: 386-391.
8. Hayashi M, Tsuchitani Y, Kawamura Y, Miura M, Takeshige F, Ebisu S. Eightyear clinical evaluation of fired ceramic inlays. Oper Dent 2000; 25: 473-481.
9. Hayashi M, Wilson NH, Yeung CA, Worthington HV. Systematic review of ceramic inlays. Clin Oral Investig 2003; 7: 8-19.
10. Hayashi M, Yeung CA. Ceramic inlays for restoring posterior teeth. Aust Dent J 2004;49:60.
11. Hikita K, Van MB, De MJ, Ikeda T, Van LK, Maida T, Lambrechts P, Peumans M. Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 71-80.
12. Islam MR, Takada T, Weerasinghe DS, Uzzaman MA, Foxton RM, Nikaido T, Tagami J. Effect of resin coating on adhesion of composite crown restoration. Dent Mater J 2006; 25: 272-279.
13. Jayasooriya PR, Pereira PN, Nikaido T, Tagami J. Efficacy of a resin coating on bond strengths of resin cement to dentin. J Esthet Restor Dent 2003; 15: 105-113.
14. Krämer N, Ebert J, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R. Ceramic inlays bonded with two adhesives after 4 years. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 13-21.
15. Krämer N, Frankenberger R. Clinical performance of bonded leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 262-271.
16. Krämer N, Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations. Am J Dent 2000;13:60D-76D.
17. Magne P, Kim TH, Cascione D, Donovan TE. Immediate dentin sealing improves bond strength of indirect restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 94:511-519.
18. Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent 2004; 29: 481-508.
19. Martin N, Jedynakiewicz NM. Clinical performance of CEREC ceramic inlays:a systematic review. Dent Mater 1999; 15: 54-61.
20. Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Folwaczny M, Hickel R. Stabilization effects of CAD/CAM ceramic restorations in extended MOD cavities. J Adhes Dent 2004; 6: 239-245.
21. Nikaido T, Cho E, Nakajima M, Tashiro H, Toba S, Burrow MF, Tagami J. Tensile bond strengths of resin cements to bovine dentin using resin coating. Am J Dent 2003;16 Spec No:41A-46A.
22. Nikolaenko SA, Lohbauer U, Roggendorf M, Petschelt A, Dasch W, Frankenberger R. Influence of c-factor and layering technique on microtensile bond strength to dentin. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 579-585.
23. Öztürk N, Aykent F. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89: 275-281.
24. Pallesen U, van Dijken JW. An 8-year evaluation of sintered ceramic and glass ceramic inlays processed by the Cerec CAD/CAM system. Eur J Oral Sci 2000; 108: 239-246.
25. Posselt A, Kerschbaum T. Longevity of 2328 chairside Cerec inlays and onlays. Int J Comput Dent 2003; 6: 231-248.
26. Reiss B. Clinical results of Cerec inlays in a dental practice over a period of 18 years. Int J Comput Dent 2006; 9: 11-22.
27. Schulz P, Johansson A, Arvidson K. A retrospective study of Mirage ceramic inlays over up to 9 years. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16: 510-514.
28. Sjögren G, Molin M, van Dijken JW. A 10-year prospective evaluation of CAD/CAM-manufactured (Cerec) ceramic inlays cemented with a chemically cured or dual-cured resin composite. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17: 241-246.
29. Stavridakis MM, Krejci I, Magne P. Immediate dentin sealing of onlay preparations: thickness of pre-cured dentin bonding agent and effect of surface cleaning. Oper Dent 2005; 30: 747-757.