Potential Functions for Hydrogen Bonds in Protein Structure Prediction and Design

Advances in Protein Chemistry

Volumn 72, Issue , 2005, Pages 1-38

  Morozov, Alexandre V ^a   Kortemme, Tanja ^b  

^a ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AB INITIO CALCULATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; DATA BASE; DIPOLE; ELECTRICITY; GEOMETRY; HYDROGEN BOND; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; MOLECULAR MODEL; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; QUANTUM MECHANICS; REVIEW; SIMULATION; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; QUANTUM THEORY; STATIC ELECTRICITY;

HYDROGEN; PROTEIN;

HYDROGEN; HYDROGEN BONDING; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEINS; QUANTUM THEORY; STATIC ELECTRICITY;

EID: 33645855864     PISSN: 00653233     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0065-3233(05)72001-5     Document Type: Review

References (101)

1. Allinger N.L., Yuh Y.H., and Lii J.-H. Molecular mechanics: The MM3 force field for hydrocarbons. 1. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 111 (1989) 8551-8566
2. Aprà E., Windus T.L., Straatsma T.P., Bylaska E.J., de Jong W., Hirata S., Valiev M., Hackler M., Pollack L., Kowalski K., Harrison R., Dupuis M., Smith D.M.A., Nieplocha J., Tipparaju V., Krishnan M., Auer A.A., Brown E., Cisneros G., Fann G., Früchtl H., Garza J., Hirao K., Kendall R., Nichols J., Tsemekhman K., Wolinski K., Anchell J., Bernholdt D., Borowski P., Clark T., Clerc D., Dachsel H., Deegan M., Dyall K., Elwood D., Glending E., Gutowski M., Hess A., Jaffe J., Johnson B., Ju J., Kobayashi R., Kutteh R., Lin Z., Littlefield R., Long X., Meng B., Nakajima T., Niu S., Rosing M., Sandrone G., Stave M., Taylor H., Thomas G., van Lenthe J., Wong A., and Zhang Z. NWChem, A computational chemistry package for parallel computers, version 4.6. (2004), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington
3. Baker E.N., and Hubbard R.E. Hydrogen bonding in globular proteins. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 44 (1984) 97-179
4. Bolon D.N., Marcus J.S., Ross S.A., and Mayo S.L. Prudent modeling of core polar residues in computational protein design. J. Mol. Biol. 329 (2003) 611-622
5. Boys S.F., and Bernardi F. Calculation of small molecular interactions by differences of separate total energies: Some procedures with reduced errors. Mol. Phys. 19 (1970) 553-566
6. Brooks B.R., Bruccoleri R.E., Olafson B.D., States D.J., Swaminathan S., and Karplus M. CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J. Comp. Chem. 4 (1983) 187-217
7. Buck M., and Karplus M. Hydrogen bond energetics: A simulation and statistical analysis of N-methyl acetamide (NMA), water, and human lysozyme. J. Phys. Chem. B 105 (2001) 11000-11015
8. Camacho C.J., and Vajda S. Protein-protein association kinetics and protein docking. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12 (2002) 36-40
9. Chen Y., Kortemme T., Robertson T., Baker D., and Varani G. A new hydrogen-bonding potential for the design of protein-RNA interactions predicts specific contacts and discriminates decoys. Nucleic Acids Res. 32 (2004) 5147-5162
10. Chevalier B.S., Kortemme T., Chadsey M.S., Baker D., Monnat R.J.J., and Stoddard B.L. Design, activity, and structure of a highly specific artificial endonuclease. Mol. Cell 10 (2002) 895-905
11. Cornell W.D., Cieplak P., Bayly C.I., Gould I.R., Merz K.M., Ferguson D.M., Spellmeyer D.C., Fox T., Caldwell J.W., and Kollman P.A. A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic acids, and organic molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117 (1995) 5179-5197
12. Dahiyat B.I., and Mayo S.L. De novo protein design: Fully automated sequence selection. Science 278 (1997) 82-87
13. Dwyer M.A., Looger L.L., and Hellinga H.W. Computational design of a biologically active enzyme. Science 304 (2004) 1967-1971
14. Dykstra C.E. Electrostatic interaction potentials in molecular force fields. Chem. Rev. 93 (1993) 2339-2353
15. Fabiola F., Bertram R., Korostelev A., and Chapman M.S. An improved hydrogen bond potential: Impact on medium resolution protein structures. Protein Sci. 11 (2002) 1415-1423
16. Feller D. Application of systematic sequences of wave-functions to the water dimer. J. Chem. Phys. 96 (1992) 6104-6114
17. Gao J., and Freindorf M. Hybrid ab initio QM/MM simulation of N-methylacetamide in aqueous solution. J. Phys. Chem. A 101 (1997) 3182-3188
18. Gavezzotti A., and Filippini G. Geometry of the intermolecular X-H... .Y (X, Y = N, O) hydrogen bond and the calibration of empirical hydrogen-bond potentials. J. Phys. Chem. 98 (1994) 4831-4837
19. Gordon D.B., Marshall S.A., and Mayo S.L. Energy functions for protein design. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 9 (1999) 509-513
20. Gray J.J., Moughon S., Kortemme T., Schueler-Furman O., Misura K.M.S., Morozov A.V., and Baker D. Protein-protein docking predictions for the CAPRI experiment. Proteins Struct. Funct. Gen. 52 (2003) 118-122
21. Gray J.J., Moughon S., Wang C., Schueler-Furman O., Kuhlman B., Rohl C.A., and Baker D. Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side-chain conformations. J. Mol. Biol. 331 (2003) 281-299
22. Grishaev A., and Bax A. An empirical backbone-backbone hydrogen-bonding potential in proteins and its applications to NMR structure refinement and validation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126 (2004) 7281-7292
23. Grzybowski B.A., Ishchenko A.V., DeWitte R.S., Whitesides G.M., and Shakhnovich E.I. Development of a knowledge-based potential for crystals of small organic molecules: Calculation of energy surfaces for C=0⋯H-N hydrogen bonds. J. Phys. Chem. B 104 (2000) 7293-7298
24. Guerois R., Nielsen J.E., and Serrano L. Predicting changes in the stability of proteins and protein complexes: A study of more than 1000 mutations. J. Mol. Biol. 320 (2002) 369-387
25. Guo H., and Karplus M. Ab initio studies of hydrogen bonding of N-methylacetamide: Structure, cooperativity, and internal rotational barriers. J. Phys. Chem. 96 (1992) 7273-7287
26. Guo H., and Karplus M. Solvent influence on the stability of the peptide hydrogen bond: A supramolecular cooperative effect. J. Phys. Chem. 98 (1994) 7104-7105
27. Hagler A.T., Huler E., and Lifson S. Energy functions for peptides and proteins. I. Derivation of a consistent force field including the hydrogen bond from amide crystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 96 (1974) 5319-5327
28. Hagler A.T., and Lifson S. Energy functions for peptides and proteins. II. Amide hydrogen bond and calculation of amide crystal properties. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 96 (1974) 5327-5335
29. Halgren T.A., and Damm W. Polarizable force fields. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 11 (2001) 236-242
30. Halperin I., Ma B., Wolfson H., and Nussinov R. Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions. Proteins Struct. Funct. Gen. 47 (2002) 409-443
31. Hansson T., Oostenbrink C., and van Gunsteren W.F. Molecular dynamics simulations. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12 (2002) 190-196
32. Hardin C., Pogorelov T.V., and Luthey-Schulten Z. Ab initio protein structure prediction. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12 (2002) 176-181
33. Hassan S.A., Guarnieri F., and Mehler E.L. Characterization of hydrogen bonding in a continuum solvent model. J. Phys. Chem. B 104 (2000) 6490-6498
34. Havranek J.J., and Harbury P.B. Automated design of specificity in molecular recognition. Nature Struct. Biol. 10 (2003) 45-52
35. Ireta J., Neugebauer J., Scheffler M., Rojo A., and Galvan M. Density functional theory study of the cooperativity of hydrogen bonds in finite and infinite α-helices. J. Phys. Chem. B 107 (2003) 1432-1437
36. Isaacs E.D., Shukla A., Platzman P.M., Hamann D.R., Barbiellini B., and Tulk C.A. Covalency of the hydrogen bond in ice: A direct X-ray measurement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 600-603
37. Jernigan R.L., and Bahar I. Structure-derived potentials and protein simulations. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 6 (1996) 195-209
38. Jorgensen W.L., and Tirado-Rives J. The OPLS potential functions for proteins: Energy minimizations for crystals of cyclic peptides and crambin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 110 (1988) 1657-1666
39. Jorgensen W.L., Maxwell D.S., and Tirado-Rives J. Development and testing of the OPLS all-atom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118 (1996) 11225-11236
40. Kaschner R., and Hohl D. Density functional theory and biomolecules: A study of glycine, alanine, and their oligopeptides. J. Phys. Chem. A 102 (1998) 5111-5116
41. Kobko N., and Dannenberg J.J. Cooperativity in amide hydrogen bonding chains: Relation between energy, position, and H-bond chain length in peptide and protein folding models. J. Phys. Chem. A 107 (2003) 10389-10395
42. Kollman P.A. Noncovalent interactions. Accounts Chem. Res. 10 (1977) 365-371
43. Kortemme T., and Baker D. A simple physical model for binding energy hot spots in protein-protein complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 (2002) 14116-14121
44. Kortemme T., and Baker D. Computational design of protein-protein interactions. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 8 (2004) 91-97
45. Kortemme T., Joachimiak L.A., Bullock A.N., Schuler A.D., Stoddard B.L., and Baker D. Computational redesign of protein-protein interaction specificity. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 11 (2004) 371-379
46. Kortemme T., Morozov A.V., and Baker D. An orientation-dependent hydrogen bonding potential improves prediction of specificity and structure for proteins and protein-protein complexes. J. Mol. Biol. 326 (2003) 1239-1259
47. Kuhlman B., and Baker D. Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97 (2000) 10383-10388
48. Lawrence M.C., and Colman P.M. Shape complementarity at protein/protein interfaces. J. Mol. Biol. 234 (1993) 946-950
49. Lazaridis T., and Karplus M. Discrimination of the native from misfolded protein models with an energy function including implicit solvation. J. Mol. Biol. 288 (1998) 477-487
50. Lazaridis T., and Karplus M. Effective energy functions for protein structure prediction. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 10 (2000) 139-145
51. Lee M.R., Tsai J., Baker D., and Kollman P.A. Molecular dynamics in the endgame of protein structure prediction. J. Mol. Biol. 313 (2001) 417-430
52. Lii J.-H., and Allinger N.L. Directional hydrogen bonding in the MM3 force field. I. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 7 (1994) 591-609
53. Lii J.-H., and Allinger N.L. Directional hydrogen bonding in the MM3 force field: II. J. Comp. Chem. 19 (1998) 1001-1016
54. Lipsitz R.S., Sharma Y., Brooks B.R., and Tjandra N. Hydrogen bonding in high-resolution protein structures: A new method to assess NMR protein geometry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124 (2002) 10621-10626
55. Looger L.L., Dwyer M.A., Smith J.J., and Hellinga H.W. Computational design of receptor and sensor proteins with novel functions. Nature 423 (2003) 185-190
56. Lumb K.J., and Kim P.S. A buried polar interaction imparts structural uniqueness in a designed heterodimeric coiled coil. Biochemistry 34 (1995) 8642-8648
57. Ma B., Lii J.-H., and Allinger N.L. Molecular polarizabilities and induced dipole moments in molecular mechanics. J. Comp. Chem. 21 (2000) 813-825
58. MacKerrell Jr. A.D., Bashford D., Bellott M., Dunbrack Jr. R.L., Evanseck J.D., Field M.J., Fischer S., Gao J., Guo H., Ha S., Joseph-McCarthy D., Kuchnir L., Kuczera K., Lau F.T.K., Mattos C., Michnick S., Ngo T., Nguyen D.T., Prodhom B., Reiher W.E., Roux III B., Schlenkrich M., Smith J.C., Stote R., Straub J., Watanabe M., Wiorkiewicz-Kuczera J., Yin D., and Karplus M.M. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B 102 (1998) 3586-3616
59. Mayo S.L., Olafson B.D., and Goddard III W.A. DREIDING: A generic force field for molecular simulations. J. Phys. Chem. 94 (1990) 8897-8909
60. McDonald I.K., and Thornton J.M. Satisfying hydrogen bonding potential in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 238 (1994) 777-793
61. McGuire R.F., Momany F.A., and Scheraga H.A. Energy parameters in polypeptides. V. Empirical hydrogen bond potential function based on molecular orbital calculations. J. Phys. Chem. 76 (1972) 375-393
62. Morozov A.V., Kortemme T., and Baker D. Evaluation of models of electrostatic interactions in proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B 107 (2003) 2075-2090
63. Morozov A.V., Kortemme T., Tsemekhman K., and Baker D. Close agreement between the orientation dependence of hydrogen bonds observed in protein structures and quantum mechanical calculations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101 (2004) 6946-6951
64. 2O. J. Chem. Phys. 55 (1971) 1236-1244
65. Najmanovich R., Kuttner J., Sobolev V., and Edelman M. Side-chain flexibility in proteins upon ligand binding. Proteins Struct. Funct. Gen. 39 (2000) 261-268
66. Neria E., Fischer S., and Karplus M. Simulation of activation free energies in molecular systems. J. Chem. Phys. 105 (1996) 1902-1921
67. No K.T., Kwon O.Y., Kim S.Y., Jhon M.S., and Scheraga H.A. A simple functional representation of angular-dependent hydrogen-bonded systems. 1. Amide, carboxylic acid, and amide-carboxylic acid pairs. J. Phys. Chem. 99 (1995) 3478-3486
68. Park C., and Goddard III W.A. Stabilization of α-helices by dipole-dipole interactions within α-helices. J. Phys. Chem. B 104 (2000) 7784-7789
69. Parr R.G., and Yang W. "Density-Functional Theory of Atoms And Molecules." (1989), Oxford University Press, Oxford
70. Pauling L., and Corey R.B. Configurations of polypeptide chains with favored orientations around single bonds: Two new pleated sheets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 37 (1951) 729-740
71. Perdew J., Burke K., and Ernzerhof M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 3865-3868
72. Perez C., and Ortiz A.R. Evaluation of docking functions for protein-ligand docking. J. Med. Chem. 44 (2001) 3768-3785
73. Petrey D., and Honig B. Free energy determinants of tertiary structure and the evaluation of protein models. Protein Sci. 9 (2000) 2181-2191
74. Pokala N., and Handel T.M. Review: Protein design-Where we were, where we are, where we're going. J. Struct. Biol. 134 (2001) 269-281
75. Ponder J.W., and Case D.A. Force fields for protein simulations. Adv. Protein Chem. 66 (2003) 27-85
76. Qian W., Mirkin N.G., and Krimm S. A spectroscopically effective molecular mechanics model for the intermolecular interactions of the hydrogen-bonded N-methylacetamide dimer. Chem. Phys. Lett. 315 (1999) 125-129
77. Ramakrishnan B., and Qasba P.K. Crystal structure of lactose synthase reveals a large conformational change in its catalytic component, the beta1, 4-galactosyltransferase-I. J. Mol. Biol. 310 (2001) 205-218
78. Reiher III W.E. "Theoretical Studies of Hydrogen Bonding." (1985), Harvard University Ph.D. Thesis
79. Reina J., Lacroix E., Hobson S.D., Fernandez-Ballester G., Rybin V., Schwab M.S., Serrano L., and Gonzalez C. Computer-aided design of a PDZ domain to recognize new target sequences. Nature Struct. Biol. 9 (2002) 621-627
80. Rohl C.A., Strauss C.E.M., Misura K., and Baker D. Protein structure prediction using Rosetta. Methods Enzymol. 383 (2004) 66-93
81. Scheiner S. "Hydrogen Bonding: A Theoretical Perspective." (1997), Oxford University Press, Oxford
82. Singh U.C., and Kollman P.A. A water dimer potential based on ab initio calculations using Morokuma component analyses. J. Chem. Phys. 83 (1985) 4033-4040
83. Smith G.R., and Sternberg M.J.E. Prediction of protein-protein interactions by docking methods. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12 (2002) 28-35
84. Szabo A., and Ostlund N.S. "Modern Quantum Chemistry: Introduction to Advanced Electronic Structure Theory." (1982), Macmillan, New York
85. Thomas P.D., and Dill K.A. An iterative method for extracting energy-like quantities from protein structures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 93 (1996) 11628-11633
86. Topol I.A., Burt S.K., and Rashin A.A. Can contemporary density functional theory yield accurate thermodynamics for hydrogen bonding?. Chem. Phys. Lett. 247 (1995) 112-119
87. Torii H., Tatsumi T., Kanazawa T., and Tasumi M. Effects of intermolecular hydrogen-bonding interactions on the amide I mode of N-methylacetamide: Matrix-isolation infrared studies and ab initio molecular orbital calculations. J. Phys. Chem. B 102 (1998) 309-314
88. Tsai C.J., Kumar S., Ma B., and Nussinov R. Folding funnels, binding funnels, and protein function. Protein Sci. 8 (1999) 1181-1190
89. Tuma C., Boese A.D., and Handy N.C. Predicting the binding energies of H-bonded complexes: A comparative DFT study. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 1 (1999) 3939-3947
90. Umeyana H., and Morokuma K.J. The origin of hydrogen bonding: An energy decomposition study. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 99 (1977) 1316-1332
91. Vajda S., and Camacho C.J. Protein-protein docking: Is the glass half-full or half-empty?. Trends Biotech. 22 (2004) 110-116
92. Vargas R., Garza J., Friesner R.A., Stern H., Hay B.P., and Dixon D.A. Strength of the N{single bond}H⋯O{double bond, long}C and C{single bond}H⋯O{double bond, long}C bonds in formamide and N-methylacetamide dimers. J. Phys. Chem. A 105 (2001) 4963-4968
93. Vorobjev Y.N., Almagro J.C., and Hermans J. Discrimination between native and intentionally misfolded conformations of proteins: ES/IS, a new method for calculating conformational free energy that uses both dynamics simulations with an explicit solvent and an implicit solvent continuum model. Proteins Struct. Funct. Gen. 32 (1998) 399-413
94. Vorobjev Y.N., and Hermans J. ES/IS: Estimation of conformational free energy by combining dynamics simulations with explicit solvent with an implicit solvent continuum model. Biophys. Chem. 78 (1999) 195-205
95. Watson T.M., and Hirst J.D. Density functional theory vibrational frequencies of amides and amide dimers. J. Phys. Chem. A 106 (2002) 7858-7867
96. Weiner S.J., Kollman P.A., Case D.A., Singh U.C., Ghio C., Alagona G., Profeta Jr. S., and Weiner P. A new force field for molecular mechanical simulation of nucleic acids and proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106 (1984) 765-784
97. Wieczorek R., and Dannenberg J.J. H-bonding cooperativity and energetics of α-helix formation of five 17-amino acid peptides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125 (2003) 8124-8129
98. 10- and α-helices. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123 (2001) 5313-5319
99. Zagrovic B., Snow C.D., Shirts M.R., and Pande V.S. Simulation of folding of a small alpha-helical protein in atomistic detail using worldwide-distributed computing. J. Mol. Biol. 323 (2002) 927-937
100. Zhang C., Liu S., Zhu Q., and Zhou Y. A knowledge-based energy function for protein-ligand, protein-protein, and protein-DNA complexes. J. Med. Chem. 48 (2005) 2325-2335
101. Zhao Y., and Wu Y. A theoretical study of β-sheet models: Is the formation of hydrogen-bond networks cooperative?. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124 (2002) 1570-1571