Information and discrimination in pairwise contact potentials

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 71, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 1071-1087

  Solis, Armando D ^a   Rackovsky, S ^a  

^a MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Divergence; Empirical potentials; Information theory; Pairwise contact potentials; Protein fold recognition; Statistical potentials; Threading

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; INFORMATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 42449129569     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.21733     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: quasi-chemical approximation. Macromolecules 1985;18:534-552.
2. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term, for simulation and threading. J Mol Biol 1996;256:623-644.
3. Skolnick J, Kolinski A, Ortiz A. Derivation of protein-specific pair potentials based on weak sequence fragment similarity. Proteins: Struct Funct Genet 2000;38:3-16.
4. Pokarowski P, Kloczkowski A, Jernigan RL, Kothari NS, Pokarowska M, Kolinski A. Inferring ideal amino acid interaction forms from statistical protein contact potentials. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinform 2005;59:49-57.
5. Jernigan RL, Bahar I. Structure-derived potentials and protein simulations. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1996;6:195-209.
6. Bryant SH, Lawrence CE. An empirical energy function for threading protein-sequence through the folding motif. Proteins: Struct Funct Genet 1993;16:92-112.
7. Park B, Levitt M. Energy functions that discriminate X-ray and near-native folds from well-constructed decoys. J Mol Biol 1996;258:367-392.
8. McConkey BJ, Sobolev V, Edelman M. Discrimination of native protein structures using atom-atom contact scoring. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:3215-3220.
9. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. Automated structure prediction of weakly homologous proteins on a genomic scale. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:7594-7599.
10. Solis AD, Rackovsky S. Improvement of statistical potentials and threading score functions using information maximization. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinform 2006;62:892-908.
11. Cline MS, Karplus K, Lathrop RH, Smith TF, Rogerts RG, Haussler D. Information-theoretic dissection of pairwise contact potentials. Proteins: Struct Funct Genet 2002;49:7-14.
12. Crooks GE, Wolfe J, Brenner SE. Measurements of protein sequence-structure correlations. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinform 2004;57:804-810.
13. Solis AD, Rackovsky S. Optimized representations and maximal information in proteins. Proteins: Struct Funct Genet 2000;38:149-164.
14. Solis AD, Rackovsky S. Optimally informative backbone structural propensities in proteins. Proteins: Struct Funct Genet 2002;48:463-486.
15. Thomas PD, Dill KA. Statistical potentials extracted from protein structures: how accurate are they? J Mol Biol 1996;257:457-469.
16. Thomas PD, Dill KA. An iterative method for extracting energy-like quantities from protein structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:11628-11633.
17. Ben-Naim A. Statistical potentials extracted from protein structures: are these meaningful potentials? J Chem Phys 1997;107:3698-3706.
18. Moult J. Comparison of database potentials and molecular mechanics force fields. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1997;7:194-199.
19. Samudrala R, Moult J. An all-atom distance-dependent conditional probability discriminatory function for protein structure prediction. J Mol Biol 1998;275:895-916.
20. Samudrala R, Moult J. Determinants of side chain conformational preferences in protein structures. Protein Eng 1998;11:991-998.
21. Lazaridis T, Karplus M. Effective energy functions for protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2000;10:139-145.
22. Wang K, Fain B, Levitt M, Samudrala R. Improved protein structure selection using decoy-dependent discriminatory functions. BMC Struct Biol 2004;4:8.
23. Dehouck Y, Gillis D, Rooman M. A New Generation of statistical potentials for proteins. Biophys J 2006;90:4010-4017.
24. Shen M-Y, Sali A. Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures. Protein Sci 2006;15:2507-2524.
25. Mirny LA, Shakhnovich EI. How to derive a protein folding potential? A new approach to an old problem. J Mol Biol 1996;264:1164-1179.
26. Cover TM, Thomas JA. Elements of information theory. New York: Wiley; 1991.
27. Godzik A, Kolinski A, Skolnick J. Are proteins ideal mixtures of amino acids? Analysis of energy parameter sets. Protein Sci 1995;4:2107-2117.
28. Godzik A. Knowledge-based potentials for protein folding: what can we learn from known protein structures? Structure 1996;4:363-366.
29. Zhang L, Skolnick J. How do potentials derived from structural databases relate to "true" potentials? Protein Sci 1998;7:112-122.
30. Zhang C, Liu S, Zhou H, Zhou Y. The dependence of all-atom statistical potentials on structural training database. Biophys J 2004;86:3349-3358.
31. Skolnick J, Jaroszewski L, Kolinski A, Godzik A. Derivation and testing of pair potentials for protein folding. When is the quasi-chemical approximation correct? Protein Sci 1997;6:676-688.
32. Hobohm U, Sander C. Enlarged representative set of protein structures. Protein Sci 1994;3:522-524.
33. Go N. Theoretical studies of protein folding. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng 1983;12:183-210.
34. Sippl M. Calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force. J Mol Biol 1990;213:859-883.