Cliques in mitotic spindle network bring kinetochore-associated complexes to form dependence pathway

Proteomics

Volumn 9, Issue 16, 2009, Pages 4048-4062

  Chen, Tzu Chi ^a   Lee, Sheng An ^b   Chan, Chen Hsiung ^b   Juang, Yue Li ^c   Hong, Yi Ren ^d   Huang, Yei Hsuan ^a   Lai, Jin Mei ^e   Kao, Cheng Yan ^b   Huang, Chi Ying F ^a  

^a NATIONAL YANG MING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c TZU CHI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^d KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^e FU JEN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Cell biology; Cliques; Hub prioritization; Mitotic spindle; Protein protein interaction network; Subnetwork specificity score

Indexed keywords

PROTEOME;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE REGULATION; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CYTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE; MITOSIS SPINDLE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEOMICS; YEAST;

HUMANS; KINETOCHORES; MITOSIS; MITOTIC SPINDLE APPARATUS; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEOMICS;

EID: 69449086529     PISSN: 16159853     EISSN: 16159861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200900231     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Sauer, G., Korner, R., Hanisch, A., Ries, A. et al., Proteome analysis of the human mitotic spindle. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2005, 4, 35-43. (Pubitemid 40309323)
2. Andersen, J. S., Wilkinson, C. J., Mayor, T., Mortensen, P. et al., Proteomic characterization of the human centrosome by protein correlation profiling. Nature 2003, 426, 570-574. (Pubitemid 37522644)
3. Bessonov, S., Anokhina, M., Will, C. L., Urlaub, H., Luhrmann, R., Isolation of an active step I spliceosome and composition of its RNP core. Nature 2008, 452, 846-850. (Pubitemid 351550864)
4. Skop, A. R., Liu, H., Yates J., III, Meyer, B. J., Heald, R., Dissection of the mammalian midbody proteome reveals conserved cytokinesis mechanisms. Science 2004, 305, 61-66. (Pubitemid 38869369)
5. Nigg, E. A., Mitotic kinases as regulators of cell division and its checkpoints. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2001, 2, 21-32.
6. Gadde, S., Heald, R., Mechanisms and molecules of the mitotic spindle. Curr. Biol. 2004, 14, R797-R805.
7. Kline-Smith, S. L., Walczak, C. E., Mitotic spindle assembly and chromosome segregation: refocusing on microtubule dynamics. Mol. Cell. 2004, 15, 317-327. (Pubitemid 39092749)
8. Compton, D. A., Spindle assembly in animal cells. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2000, 69, 95-114.
9. Scholey, J. M., Brust-Mascher, I., Mogilner, A., Cell division. Nature 2003, 422, 746-752.
10. Rajagopalan, H., Lengauer, C., Aneuploidy and cancer. Nature 2004, 432, 338-341.
11. Hassold, T., Hunt, P., To err (meiotically) is human: the genesis of human aneuploidy. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2001, 2, 280-291. (Pubitemid 33674776)
12. Barabasi, A. L., Oltvai, Z. N., Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2004, 5, 101-113.
13. Hakes, L., Pinney, J. W., Robertson, D. L., Lovell, S. C., Protein-protein interaction networks and biology - what's the connection? Nat. Biotechnol. 2008, 26, 69-72.
14. Yu, H., Braun, P., Yildirim, M. A., Lemmens, I. et al., High-quality binary protein interaction map of the yeast interactome network. Science 2008, 322, 104-110.
15. Hart, G. T., Ramani, A. K., Marcotte, E. M., How complete are current yeast and human protein-interaction networks? Genome Biol. 2006, 7, 120.
16. Friedman, N., Inferring cellular networks using probabilistic graphical models. Science 2004, 303, 799-805. (Pubitemid 38174650)
17. Flannick, J., Novak, A., Srinivasan, B. S., McAdams, H. H., Batzoglou, S., Graemlin: general and robust alignment of multiple large interaction networks. Genome Res. 2006, 16, 1169-1181. (Pubitemid 44320404)
18. Kelley, B. P., Sharan, R., Karp, R. M., Sittler, T. et al., Conserved pathways within bacteria and yeast as revealed by global protein network alignment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 11394-11399. (Pubitemid 37205946)
19. Sharan, R., Ideker, T., Modeling cellular machinery through biological network comparison. Nat. Biotechnol. 2006, 24, 427-433.
20. Vespignani, A., Evolution thinks modular. Nat. Genet. 2003, 35, 118-119.
21. Zhang, S., Jin, G., Zhang, X. S., Chen, L., Discovering functions and revealing mechanisms at molecular level from biological networks. Proteomics 2007, 7, 2856-2869. (Pubitemid 47359926)
22. Srinivasan, B. S., Shah, N. H., Flannick, J. A., Abeliuk, E. et al., Current progress in network research: toward reference networks for key model organisms. Brief. Bioinform. 2007, 8, 318-332. (Pubitemid 350142621)
23. Jeong, H., Mason, S. P., Barabasi, A. L., Oltvai, Z. N., Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature 2001, 411, 41-42.
24. Estrada, E., Virtual identification of essential proteins within the protein interaction network of yeast. Proteomics 2006, 6, 35-40. (Pubitemid 43142931)
25. Yu, H., Greenbaum, D., Xin Lu, H., Zhu, X., Gerstein, M., Genomic analysis of essentiality within protein networks. Trends Genet. 2004, 20, 227-231. (Pubitemid 38625679)
26. Luscombe, N. M., Babu, M. M., Yu, H., Snyder, M. et al., Genomic analysis of regulatory network dynamics reveals large topological changes. Nature 2004, 431, 308-312. (Pubitemid 39265665)
27. Vazquez, A., Dobrin, R., Sergi, D., Eckmann, J. P. et al., The topological relationship between the large-scale attributes and local interaction patterns of complex networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA 2004, 101, 17940-17945. (Pubitemid 40054054)
28. Rives, A. W., Galitski, T., Modular organization of cellular networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 1128-1133.
29. Guimera, R., Sales-Pardo, M., Amaral, L. A., Classes of complex networks defined by role-to-role connectivity profiles. Nat. Phys. 2007, 3, 63-69.
30. Palla, G., Barabasi, A. L., Vicsek, T., Quantifying social group evolution. Nature 2007, 446, 664-667.
31. Spirin, V., Mirny, L. A., Protein complexes and functional modules in molecular networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 12123-12128. (Pubitemid 37271525)
32. Lee, S. A., Chan, C. H., Tsai, C. H., Lai, J. M. et al., Ortholog-based protein-protein interaction prediction and its application to inter-species interactions. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9 (Suppl. 12), S11.
33. Huang, T. W., Lin, C. Y., Kao, C. Y., Reconstruction of human protein interolog network using evolutionary conserved network. BMC Bioinformatics 2007, 8, 152.
34. Ho, Y., Gruhler, A., Heilbut, A., Bader, G. D. et al., Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature 2002, 415, 180-183. (Pubitemid 34059520)
35. Gavin, A. C., Bosche, M., Krause, R., Grandi, P. et al., Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature 2002, 415, 141-147. (Pubitemid 34059510)
36. Han, J. D., Bertin, N., Hao, T., Goldberg, D. S. et al., Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein-protein interaction network. Nature 2004, 430, 88-93. (Pubitemid 38915230)
37. Jeong, H., Tombor, B., Albert, R., Oltvai, Z. N., Barabasi, A. L., The large-scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature 2000, 407, 651-654.
38. van Noort, V., Snel, B., Huynen, M. A., The yeast coexpression network has a small-world, scale-free architecture and can be explained by a simple model. EMBO Rep. 2004, 5, 280-284. (Pubitemid 38500108)
39. Stelzl, U., Worm, U., Lalowski, M., Haenig, C. et al., A human protein-protein interaction network: a resource for annotating the proteome. Cell 2005, 122, 957-968. (Pubitemid 41345212)
40. Surka, M. C., Tsang, C. W., Trimble, W. S., The mammalian septin MSF localizes with microtubules and is required for completion of cytokinesis. Mol. Biol. Cell 2002, 13, 3532-3545.
41. Finger, F. P., One ring to bind them. Septins and actin assembly. Dev. Cell 2002, 3, 761-763.
42. Robertson, C., Church, S. W., Nagar, H. A., Price, J. et al., Properties of SEPT9 isoforms and the requirement for GTP binding. J. Pathol. 2004, 203, 519-527. (Pubitemid 38529031)
43. Kinoshita, M., Kumar, S.,Mizoguchi, A., Ide, C. et al., Nedd5, a mammalian septin, is a novel cytoskeletal component interacting with actin-based structures. Genes Dev. 1997, 11, 1535-1547. (Pubitemid 27274398)
44. Vagnarelli, P., Earnshaw, W. C., Chromosomal passengers: the four-dimensional regulation of mitotic events. Chromosoma 2004, 113, 211-222. (Pubitemid 39462364)
45. Ruchaud, S., Carmena, M., Earnshaw, W. C., Chromosomal passengers: conducting cell division. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007, 8, 798-812. (Pubitemid 47462135)
46. Spiliotis, E. T., Kinoshita, M., Nelson, W. J., A mitotic septin scaffold required for Mammalian chromosome congression and segregation. Science 2005, 307, 1781-1785. (Pubitemid 40388620)
47. King, A. D., Przulj, N., Jurisica, I., Protein complex prediction via cost-based clustering. Bioinformatics 2004, 20, 3013-3020. (Pubitemid 39619193)
48. Musacchio, A., Salmon, E. D., The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007, 8, 379-393.
49. Ciferri, C., Musacchio, A., Petrovic, A., The Ndc80 complex: hub of kinetochore activity. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581, 2862-2869. (Pubitemid 46881153)
50. Arnaoutov, A., Dasso, M., The Ran GTPase regulates kinetochore function. Dev. Cell 2003, 5, 99-111. (Pubitemid 36827345)
51. Zuccolo, M., Alves, A., Galy, V., Bolhy, S. et al., The human Nup107-160 nuclear pore subcomplex contributes to proper kinetochore functions. EMBO J. 2007, 26, 1853-1864. (Pubitemid 46624053)
52. Liu, D., Ding, X., Du, J., Cai, X. et al., Human NUF2 interacts with centromere-associated protein E and is essential for a stable spindle microtubule-kinetochore attachment. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 21415-21424. (Pubitemid 47099950)
53. Wang, X., Babu, J. R., Harden, J. M., Jablonski, S. A. et al., The mitotic checkpoint protein hBUB3 and the mRNA export factor hRAE1 interact with GLE2p-binding sequence (GLEBS)-containing proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 26559-26567. (Pubitemid 37412878)
54. Taylor, S. S., Ha, E., McKeon, F., The human homologue of Bub3 is required for kinetochore localization of Bub1 and a Mad3/Bub1-related protein kinase. J. Cell Biol. 1998, 142, 1-11. (Pubitemid 28341135)
55. Babu, J. R., Jeganathan, K. B., Baker, D. J., Wu, X. et al., Rae1 is an essential mitotic checkpoint regulator that cooperates with Bub3 to prevent chromosome missegregation. J. Cell Biol. 2003, 160, 341-353. (Pubitemid 36182725)
56. Obuse, C., Iwasaki, O., Kiyomitsu, T., Goshima, G. et al., A conserved Mis12 centromere complex is linked to heterochromatic HP1 and outer kinetochore protein Zwint-1. Nat. Cell Biol. 2004, 6, 1135-1141. (Pubitemid 39468016)
57. Lin, Y. T., Chen, Y., Wu, G., Lee, W. H., Hec1 sequentially recruits Zwint-1 and ZW10 to kinetochores for faithful chromosome segregation and spindle checkpoint control. Oncogene 2006, 25, 6901-6914. (Pubitemid 44684831)
58. Acquaviva, C., Herzog, F., Kraft, C., Pines, J., The anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome is recruited to centromeres by the spindle assembly checkpoint. Nat. Cell Biol. 2004, 6, 892-898. (Pubitemid 39207254)
59. Buffin, E., Lefebvre, C., Huang, J., Gagou, M. E., Karess, R. E., Recruitment of Mad2 to the kinetochore requires the Rod/Zw10 complex. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15, 856-861. (Pubitemid 40689406)
60. McAinsh, A. D., Meraldi, P., Draviam, V. M., Toso, A., Sorger, P. K., The human kinetochore proteins Nnf1R and Mcm21R are required for accurate chromosome segregation. EMBO J. 2006, 25, 4033-4049. (Pubitemid 44338745)
61. Martin-Lluesma, S., Stucke, V. M., Nigg, E. A., Role of Hec1 in spindle checkpoint signaling and kinetochore recruitment of Mad1/Mad2. Science 2002, 297, 2267-2270.
62. Zhu, M.,Wang, F., Yan, F., Yao, P. Y. et al., Septin 7 interacts with centromere-associated protein E and is required for its kinetochore localization. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 18916-18925.
63. De Antoni, A., Pearson, C. G., Cimini, D., Canman, J. C. et al., The Mad1/Mad2 complex as a template for Mad2 activation in the spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15, 214-225. (Pubitemid 40205701)
64. Sudakin, V., Chan, G. K., Yen, T. J., Checkpoint inhibition of the APC/C in HeLa cells is mediated by a complex of BUBR1, BUB3, CDC20, and MAD2. J. Cell Biol. 2001, 154, 925-936. (Pubitemid 34286173)
65. Kallio, M., Weinstein, J., Daum, J. R., Burke, D. J., Gorbsky, G. J., Mammalian p55CDC mediates association of the spindle checkpoint protein Mad2 with the cyclosome/anaphase-promoting complex, and is involved in regulating anaphase onset and late mitotic events. J. Cell Biol. 1998, 141, 1393-1406. (Pubitemid 28289914)
66. Pellegrini, M., Marcotte, E. M., Thompson, M. J., Eisenberg, D., Yeates, T. O., Assigning protein functions by comparative genome analysis: protein phylogenetic profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 4285-4288. (Pubitemid 29190328)
67. Walhout, A. J., Boulton, S. J., Vidal, M., Yeast two-hybrid systems and protein interaction mapping projects for yeast and worm. Yeast 2000, 17, 88-94.
68. Wuchty, S., Oltvai, Z. N., Barabasi, A. L., Evolutionary conservation of motif constituents in the yeast protein interaction network. Nat. Genet. 2003, 35, 176-179.pt