Standardized and reproducible methodology for the comprehensive and systematic assessment of surgical resection margins during breast-conserving surgery for invasive breast cancer

BMC Cancer

Volumn 9, Issue , 2009, Pages

  Povoski, Stephen P ^a   Jimenez, Rafael E ^b,c   Wang, Wenle P ^b,d   Xu, Ronald X ^e  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^d VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e Ohio State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIESTROGEN; ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ACCURACY; ADENOID CYST CARCINOMA; ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CONSERVING SURGERY; BREAST SURGERY; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CANCER INVASION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INVASIVE BREAST CANCER; INVASIVE DUCTAL CARCINOMA; INVASIVE LOBULAR CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MIXED INVASIVE DUCTAL CARCINOMA; MIXED INVASIVE LOBULAR CARCINOMA; MUCINOUS CARCINOMA; PAPILLARY CARCINOMA; REOPERATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STANDARDIZATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; AGED; BREAST; BREAST TUMOR; COMPUTER SIMULATION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; ONCOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; SEGMENTAL MASTECTOMY; STANDARD; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MEDICAL ONCOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 68949196785     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712407     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-254     Document Type: Article

References (96)

1. Burak WE Agnese DM Povoski SP Advances in the surgical management of early stage invasive breast cancer Curr Probl Surg 2004, 41:877-936 10.1067/S0011-3840(04)00113-3
2. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Guidelines in Oncology for Breast Cancer (V.1.2009) http://www.nccn.org/professionals/ physician_gls/PDF/breast.pdf
3. Fisher B Bauer M Margolese R Poisson R Pilch Y Redmond C Fisher E Wolmark N Deutsch M Montague E Saffer E Wickerman L Lerner H Glass A Shibata H Deckers P Ketcham A Oishi R Russell I Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer N Engl J Med 1985, 312:665-673 3883167
4. Fisher B Redmond C Poisson R Margolese R Wolmark N Wickerham L Fisher E Deutsch M Caplan R Pilch Y Glass A Shibata H Lerner H Terz J Sidorovich L Eight-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer N Engl J Med 1989, 320:822-828 2927449
5. Veronesi U Banfi A Salvadori B Luini A Saccozzi R Zucali R Marubini E Del Vecchio M Boracchi P Marchini S Breast conservation is the treatment of choice in small breast cancer: Long-term results of a randomized trial Eur J Cancer 1990, 26:668-670 2144152
6. Fisher B Anderson S Redmond CK Wolmark N Wickerham DL Cronin WM Reanalysis and results after 12 years of follow-up in a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy with lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer N Engl J Med 1995, 333:1456-1461 10.1056/NEJM199511303332203 7477145
7. Jacobson JA Danforth DN Cowan KH d'Angelo T Steinberg SM Pierce L Lippman ME Lichter AS Glatstein E Okunieff P Ten-year results of a comparison of conservation with mastectomy in the treatment of stage I and II breast cancer N Engl J Med 1995, 332:907-911 10.1056/ NEJM199504063321402 7877647
8. Fisher ER Lumpectomy margins and much more Cancer 1997, 79:1453-1458 discussion 1459-1460. 10.1002/ (SICI)1097-0142(19970415)79:8<1453::AID-CNCR1>3.0.CO;2-C 9118023
9. Carter D Margins of "lumpectomy" for breast cancer Hum Pathol 1986, 17:330-332 10.1016/S0046-8177(86)80455-5 3957334
10. Gould EW Robinson PG The pathologist's examination of the "lumpectomy" - the pathologists' view of surgical margins Semin Surg Oncol 1992, 8:129-135 1496222
11. Veronesi U How important is the assessment of resection margins in conservative surgery for breast cancer? Cancer 1994, 74:1660-1661 10.1002/ 1097-0142(19940915)74:6<1660::AID-CNCR2820740603>3.0.CO;2-T 8082066
12. Klimberg VS Harms S Korourian S Assessing margin status Surg Oncol 1999, 8:77-84 10.1016/S0960-7404(99)00031-6 10732959
13. Bland KI Surgical margins in breast cancer: How wide? How accurate? How big? Does it make a difference? Curr Surg 2001, 58:248-253 10.1016/ S0149-7944(00)00375-5 11397481
14. Taghian A Mohiuddin M Jagsi R Goldberg S Ceilley E Powell S Current perceptions regarding surgical margin status after breast-conserving therapy: Results of a survey Ann Surg 2005, 241:629-639 1357067 15798465 10.1097/01.sla.0000157272.04803.1b
15. Jacobs L Positive margins: The challenge continues for breast surgeons Ann Surg Oncol 2008, 15:1271-1272 2277448 18320287 10.1245/ s10434-007-9766-0
16. Morrow M Margins in breast-conserving therapy: Have we lost sight of the big picture? Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2008, 8:1193-1196 10.1586/ 14737140.8.8.1193 18699757
17. Luini A Rososchansky J Gatti G Zurrida S Caldarella P Viale G Rosali dos Santos G Frasson A The surgical margin status after breast-conserving surgery: Discussion of an open issue Breast Cancer Res Treat 2009, 113:397-402 10.1007/s10549-008-9929-0 18386174
18. Larson RE Hostetler RP Edwards BH Calculus with Analytical Geometry New York: Houghton Mifflin 1998
19. Gilat A Subramaniam V Numerical Methods for Engineers and Scientists: An Introduction with Applications using MATLAB New York: John Wiley & Sons 2008
20. McCormick B Kinne D Petrek J Osborne M Cox L Shank B Hellman S Yahalom J Rosen PP Limited resection for breast cancer: A study of inked specimen margins before radiotherapy Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1987, 13:1667-1671 2444573
21. Umpleby HC Herbert A Royle GT Taylor I Wide excision of primary breast cancer: The incidence of residual carcinoma at the site of excision Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1988, 70:246-248 2498777 2843075
22. England DW Chan SY Stonelake PS Lee MJ Assessment of excision margins following wide local excision for breast carcinoma using specimen scrape cytology and tumour bed biopsy Eur J Surg Oncol 1994, 20:425-429 8076703
23. MacMillan RD Purushotham AD Mallon E Ramsay G George WD Breast-conserving surgery and tumour bed positivity in patients with breast cancer Br J Surg 1994, 81:56-58 10.1002/bjs.1800810119 8313122
24. Schnitt SJ Abner A Gelman R Connolly JL Recht A Duda RB Eberlein TJ Mayzel K Silver B Harris JR The relationship between microscopic margins of resection and the risk of local recurrence in patients with breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy Cancer 1994, 74:1746-1751 10.1002/ 1097-0142(19940915)74:6<1746::AID-CNCR2820740617>3.0.CO;2-Y 8082077
25. Beron PJ Horwitz EM Martinez AA Wimbish KJ Levine AJ Gustafson G Chen PY Ingold JA Vicini FA Pathologic and mammographic findings predicting the adequacy of tumor excision before breast-conserving therapy AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996, 167:1409-1414 8956568
26. Gage I Schnitt SJ Nixon AJ Silver B Recht A Troyan SL Eberlein T Love SM Gelman R Harris JR Connolly JL Pathologic margin involvement and the risk of recurrence in patients treated with breast-conserving therapy Cancer 1996, 78:1921-1928 10.1002/ (SICI)1097-0142(19961101)78:9<1921::AID-CNCR12>3.0.CO;2-# 8909312
27. MacMillan RD Purushotham AD Mallon E Love JG George WD Tumour bed positivity predicts outcome after breast-conserving surgery Br J Surg 1997, 84:1559-1562 10.1002/bjs.1800841119 9393279
28. Saarela AO Paloneva TK Rissanen TJ Kiviniemi HO Determinants of positive histologic margins and residual tumor after lumpectomy for early breast cancer: A prospective study with special reference to touch preparation cytology J Surg Oncol 1997, 66:248-253 10.1002/ (SICI)1096-9098(199712)66:4<248::AID-JSO5>3.0.CO;2-B 9425328
29. Weber S Storm FK Stitt J Mahvi DM The role of frozen section analysis of margins during breast conservation surgery Cancer J Sci Am 1997, 3:273-277 9327150
30. Beck NE Bradburn MJ Vincenti AC Rainsbury RM Detection of residual disease following breast-conserving surgery Br J Surg 1998, 85:1273-1276 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00876.x 9752875
31. DiBiase SJ Komarnicky LT Schwartz GF Xie Y Mansfield CM The number of positive margins influences the outcome of women treated with breast preservation for early stage breast carcinoma Cancer 1998, 82:2212-2220 10.10A2/(sici)1097-0142(19980601)82:11<2212::aid-cncr16>3.0.co;2-x 9610701
32. Taylor I Mullee MA Carpenter R Royle G McKay CJ Cross M The significance of involved tumour bed biopsy following wide local excision of breast cancer Eur J Surg Oncol 1998, 24:110-113 10.1016/S0748-7983(98)91407-X 9591025
33. Horiguchi J Iino Y Takei H Maemura M Yokoe T Niibe H Yamakawa M Nakajima T Oyama T Morishita Y Surgical margin and breast recurrence after breast-conserving therapy Oncol Rep 1999, 6:135-138 9864416
34. Malik HZ George WD Mallon EA Harnett AN MacMillan RD Purushotham AD Margin assessment by cavity shaving after breast-conserving surgery: analysis and follow-up of 543 patients Eur J Surg Oncol 1999, 25:464-469 10.1053/ejso.1999.0680 10527593
35. Papa MZ Zippel D Koller M Klein E Chetrit A Ari GB Positive margins of breast biopsy: Is reexcision always necessary? J Surg Oncol 1999, 70:167-171 10.1002/ (SICI)1096-9098(199903)70:3<167::AID-JSO4>3.0.CO;2-7 10102346
36. Park CC Mitsumori M Nixon A Recht A Connolly J Gelman R Silver B Hetelekidis S Abner A Harris JR Schnitt SJ Outcome at 8 years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer: Influence of margin status and systemic therapy on local recurrence J Clin Oncol 2000, 18:1668-1675 10764427
37. Gibson GR Lesnikoski BA Yoo J Mott LA Cady B Barth RJ Jr A comparison of ink-directed and traditional whole-cavity re-excision for breast lumpectomy specimens with positive margins Ann Surg Oncol 2001, 8:693-704 10.1007/s10434-001-0693-1 11597009
38. Jenkinson AD Al-Mufti RA Mohsen Y Berry MJ Wells C Carpenter R Does intraductal breast cancer spread in a segmental distribution? An analysis of residual tumour burden following segmental mastectomy using tumour bed biopsies Eur J Surg Oncol 2001, 27:21-25 10.1053/ ejso.2000.1051 11237487
39. Moore MM Whitney LA Cerilli L Imbrie JZ Bunch M Simpson VB Hanks JB Intraoperative ultrasound is associated with clear lumpectomy margins for palpable infiltrating ductal breast cancer Ann Surg 2001, 233:761-768 1421318 11371734 10.1097/00000658-200106000-00005
40. Swanson GP Rynearson K Symmonds R Significance of margins of excision on breast cancer recurrence Am J Clin Oncol 2002, 25:438-441 10.1097/ 00000421-200210000-00002 12393979
41. Mai KT Perkins DG Mirsky D Location and extent of positive resection margins and ductal carcinoma in situ in lumpectomy specimens of ductal breast carcinoma examined with a microscopic three-dimensional view Breast J 2003, 9:33-38 10.1046/j.1524-4741.2003.09108.x 12558668
42. Chagpar AB Martin RC 2nd Hagendoorn LJ Chao C McMasters KM Lumpectomy margins are affected by tumor size and histologic subtype but not by biopsy technique Am J Surg 2004, 188:399-402 10.1016/ j.amjsurg.2004.06.020 15474434
43. Keskek M Kothari M Ardehali B Betambeau N Nasiri N Gui GP Factors predisposing to cavity margin positivity following conservation surgery for breast cancer Eur J Surg Oncol 2004, 30:1058-1064 10.1016/ j.ejso.2004.07.019 15522551
44. Miller AR Brandao G Prihoda TJ Hill C Cruz AB Jr Yeh IT Positive margins following surgical resection of breast carcinoma: Analysis of pathologic correlates J Surg Oncol 2004, 86:134-140 10.1002/jso.20059 15170651
45. Fleming FJ Hill AD Mc Dermott EW O'Doherty A O'Higgins NJ Quinn CM Intraoperative margin assessment and re-excision rate in breast conserving surgery Eur J Surg Oncol 2004, 30:233-237 10.1016/ j.ejso.2003.11.008 15028301
46. Balch GC Mithani SK Simpson JF Kelley MC Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy Am Surg 2005, 71:22-27 discussion 27-28. 15757052
47. Cao D Lin C Woo SH Vang R Tsangaris TN Argani P Separate cavity margin sampling at the time of initial breast lumpectomy significantly reduces the need for reexcisions Am J Surg Pathol 2005, 29:1625-1632 10.1097/ 01.pas.0000180448.08203.70 16327435
48. Cendán JC Coco D Copeland EM 3rd Accuracy of intraoperative frozen-section analysis of breast cancer lumpectomy-bed margins J Am Coll Surg 2005, 201:194-198 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.03.014 16038815
49. Dooley WC Parker J Understanding the mechanisms creating false positive lumpectomy margins Am J Surg 2005 190 606 608 10.1016/ j.amjsurg.2005.06.023 16164932
50. Nadeem R Chagla LS Harris O Desmond S Thind R Titterrell C Audisio RA Occult breast lesions: A comparison between radioguided occult lesion localisation (ROLL) vs. wire-guided lumpectomy (WGL) Breast 2005, 14:283-289 10.1016/j.breast.2005.04.002 15985370
51. Aziz D Rawlinson E Narod SA Sun P Lickley HL McCready DR Holloway CM The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer Breast J 2006, 12:331-337 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2006.00271.x 16848842
52. Dillon MF Hill AD Quinn CM McDermott EW O'Higgins N A pathologic assessment of adequate margin status in breast-conserving therapy Ann Surg Oncol 2006, 13:333-339 10.1245/ASO.2006.03.098 16474911
53. Huston TL Pigalarga R Osborne MP Tousimis E The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast-conserving surgery Am J Surg 2006, 192:509-512 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.06.021 16978962
54. Janes SE Stankhe M Singh S Isgar B Systematic cavity shaves reduces close margins and re-excision rates in breast conserving surgery Breast 2006, 15:326-330 10.1016/j.breast.2005.10.006 16337123
55. Méndez JE Lamorte WW de Las Morenas A Cerda S Pistey R King T Kavanah M Hirsch E Stone MD Influence of breast cancer margin assessment method on the rates of positive margins and residual carcinoma Am J Surg 2006, 192:538-540 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.06.009 16978970
56. Cabioglu N Hunt KK Sahin AA Kuerer HM Babiera GV Singletary SE Whitman GJ Ross MI Ames FC Feig BW Buchholz TA Meric-Bernstam F Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery Ann Surg Oncol 2007, 14:1458-1471 10.1245/ s10434-006-9236-0 17260108
57. Kotwall C Ranson M Stiles A Hamann MS Relationship between initial margin status for invasive breast cancer and residual carcinoma after re-excision Am Surg 2007, 73:337-343 17439024
58. Smitt MC Horst K Association of clinical and pathologic variables with lumpectomy surgical margin status after preoperative diagnosis or excisional biopsy of invasive breast cancer Ann Surg Oncol 2007, 14:1040-1044 10.1245/s10434-006-9308-1 17203329
59. Wright MJ Park J Fey JV Park A O'Neill A Tan LK Borgen PI Cody HS 3rd Van Zee KJ King TA Perpendicular inked versus tangential shaved margins in breast-conserving surgery: Does the method matter? J Am Coll Surg 2007, 204:541-549 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.01.031 17382212
60. Dillon MF Maguire AA McDermott EW Myers C Hill AD O'Doherty A Quinn CM Needle core biopsy characteristics identify patients at risk of compromised margins in breast conservation surgery Mod Pathol 2008, 21:39-45 10.1038/modpathol.3800975 17948023
61. Jacobson AF Asad J Boolbol SK Osborne MP Boachie-Adjei K Feldman SM Do additional shaved margins at the time of lumpectomy eliminate the need for re-excision? Am J Surg 2008, 196:556-558 10.1016/ j.amjsurg.2008.06.007 18809063
62. Schiller DE Le LW Cho BC Youngson BJ McCready DR Factors associated with negative margins of lumpectomy specimen: Potential use in selecting patients for intraoperative radiotherapy Ann Surg Oncol 2008, 15:833-842 10.1245/s10434-007-9711-2 18163174
63. Soucy G Bélanger J Leblanc G Sideris L Drolet P Mitchell A Leclerc YE Dufresne MP Beaudet J Dubé P Surgical margins in breast-conservation operations for invasive carcinoma: Does neoadjuvant chemotherapy have an impact? J Am Coll Surg 2008, 206:1116-1121 10.1016/ j.jamcollsurg.2007.12.025 18501808
64. Lovrics PJ Cornacchi SD Farrokhyar F Garnett A Chen V Franic S Simunovic M The relationship between surgical factors and margin status after breast-conservation surgery for early stage breast cancer Am J Surg 2009, 197:740-746 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.03.007 18789424
65. Sabel MS Rogers K Griffith K Jagsi R Kleer CG Diehl KA Breslin TM Cimmino VM Chang AE Newman LA Residual disease after re-excision lumpectomy for close margins J Surg Oncol 2009, 99:99-103 10.1002/ jso.21215 19065638
66. Tengher-Barna I Hequet D Reboul-Marty J Frassati-Biaggi A Seince N Rodrigues-Faure A Uzan M Ziol M Prevalence and predictive factors for the detection of carcinoma in cavity margin performed at the time of breast lumpectomy Mod Pathol 2009, 22:299-305 10.1038/modpathol.2008.186 18997732
67. Munhoz AM Montag E Arruda E Aldrighi CM Filassi JR Piato JR Prado LC Aldrighi JM Gemperli R Ferreira MC Immediate reconstruction following breast-conserving surgery: Management of the positive surgical margins and influence on secondary reconstruction Breast 2009, 18:47-54 10.1016/ j.breast.2008.10.005 19110425
68. Hewes JC Imkampe A Haji A Bates T Importance of routine cavity sampling in breast conservation surgery Br J Surg 2009, 96:47-53 10.1002/bjs.6435 19108003
69. Holland R Veling SH Mravunac M Hendriks JH Histologic multifocality of Tis, T1-2 breast carcinomas. Implications for clinical trials of breast-conserving surgery Cancer 1985, 56:979-990 10.1002/ 1097-0142(19850901)56:5<979::AID-CNCR2820560502>3.0.CO;2-N 2990668
70. Johnson JE Page DL Winfield AC Reynolds VH Sawyers JL Recurrent mammary carcinoma after local excision. A segmental problem Cancer 1995, 75:1612-1618 10.1002/ 1097-0142(19950401)75:7<1612::AID-CNCR2820750710>3.0.CO;2-G 8826918
71. Holland R Veling SH Mravunac M Hendriks JH Histologic multifocality of Tis, T1-2 breast carcinomas. Implications for clinical trials of breast-conserving surgery Cancer 1985, 56:979-990 10.1002/ 1097-0142(19850901)56:5<979::AID-CNCR2820560502>3.0.CO;2-N 2990668
72. Schnitt SJ Connolly JL Recht A Silver B Harris JR Breast relapse following primary radiation therapy for early breast cancer. II. Detection, pathologic features and prognostic significance Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1985, 11:1277-1284 2989229
73. Kurtz JM Amalric R Brandone H Ayme Y Jacquemier J Pietra JC Hans D Pollet JF Bressac C Spitalier JM Local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy. Frequency, time course, and prognosis Cancer 1989, 63:1912-1917 10.1002/ 1097-0142(19890515)63:10<1912::AID-CNCR2820631007>3.0.CO;2-Y 2702564
74. Fowble B Solin LJ Schultz DJ Rubenstein J Goodman RL Breast recurrence following conservative surgery and radiation: Patterns of failure, prognosis, and pathologic findings from mastectomy specimens with implications for treatment Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1990, 19:833-842 2170305
75. Vicini FA Recht A Abner A Boyages J Cady B Connolly JL Gelman R Osteen RT Schnitt SJ Silen W Harris JR Recurrence in the breast following conservative surgery and radiation therapy for early-stage breast cancer J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1992, 11:33-39 1627429
76. Komoike Y Akiyama F Iino Y Ikeda T Tanaka-Akashi S Ohsumi S Kusama M Sano M Shin E Suemasu K Sonoo H Taguchi T Nishi T Nishimura R Haga S Mise K Kinoshita T Murakami S Yoshimoto M Tsukuma H Inaji H Analysis of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences after breast-conserving treatment based on the classification of true recurrences and new primary tumors Breast Cancer 2005, 12:104-111 10.2325/jbcs.12.104 15858440
77. Olson TP Harter J Muñoz A Mahvi DM Breslin T Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence Ann Surg Oncol 2007, 14:2953-2960 17674109
78. Marudanayagam R Singhal R Tanchel B O'Connor B Balasubramanian B Paterson I Effect of cavity shaving on reoperation rate following breast-conserving surgery Breast J 2008, 14:570-573 10.1111/ j.1524-4741.2008.00649.x 19000040
79. Fedorcik GG Sachs R Goldfarb MA Oncologic and aesthetic results following breast-conserving therapy with 0.5 cm margins in 100 consecutive patients Breast J 2006, 12:108-211 10.1111/ j.1075-122X.2006.00243.x 16684317
80. von Smitten K Margin status after breast-conserving treatment of breast cancer: How much free margin is enough? J Surg Oncol 2008, 98:585-587 10.1002/jso.21038 19072849
81. Guidi AJ Connolly JL Harris JR Schnitt SJ The relationship between shaved margin and inked margin status in breast excision specimens Cancer 1997 79 1568 1573 10.1002/ (SICI)1097-0142(19970415)79:8<1568::AID-CNCR19>3.0.CO;2-W 9118040
82. Pourquier D Lemanski C Kamar A Lumpectomy margins and much more Cancer 1998, 82:2289-2293 10.1002/ (SICI)1097-0142(19980601)82:11<2289::AID-CNCR27>3.0.CO;2-P 9610712
83. Graham RA Homer MJ Katz J Rothschild J Safaii H Supran S The pancake phenomenon contributes to the inaccuracy of margin assessment in patients with breast cancer Am J Surg 2002, 184:89-93 10.1016/ S0002-9610(02)00902-9 12169349
84. Jimenez RE Bongers S Bouwman D Segel M Visscher DW Clinicopathologic significance of ductal carcinoma in situ in breast core needle biopsies with invasive cancer Am J Surg Pathol 2000, 24:123-128 10.1097/ 00000478-200001000-00015 10632496
85. Schnitt SJ Connolly JL Khettry U Mazoujian G Brenner M Silver B Recht A Beadle G Harris JR Pathologic findings on re-excision of the primary site in breast cancer patients considered for treatment by primary radiation therapy Cancer 1987, 59:675-681 10.1002/ 1097-0142(19870215)59:4<675::AID-CNCR2820590402>3.0.CO;2-U 3026606
86. Wazer DE Schmidt-Ullrich RK Schmid CH Ruthazer R Kramer B Safaii H Graham R The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997, 38:291-299 9226315
87. Wazer DE Schmidt-Ullrich RK Ruthazer R DiPetrillo T Boyle T Kanski J Safaii H The influence of age and extensive intraductal component histology upon breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999, 45:885-891 10571194
88. Bartelink H Borger JH van Dongen JA Peterse JL The impact of tumor size and histology on local control after breast-conserving therapy Radiother Oncol 1988, 11:297-303 10.1016/0167-8140(88)90200-9 2836892
89. Bulman AS Lindley RP Parsons P Ellis H Pathological features of invasive breast cancer associated with a high risk of local recurrence after tumour excision and radical radiotherapy Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1988, 70:289-292 2498825 2847625
90. Lindley R Bulman A Parsons P Phillips R Henry K Ellis H Histologic features predictive of an increased risk of early local recurrence after treatment of breast cancer by local tumor excision and radical radiotherapy Surgery 1989, 105:13-20 2911801
91. Fourquet A Campana F Zafrani B Mosseri V Vielh P Durand JC Vilcoq JR Prognostic factors of breast recurrence in the conservative management of early breast cancer: A 25-year follow-up Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1989, 17:719-725 2777661
92. Zafrani B Vielh P Fourquet A Mosseri V Durand JC Salmon RJ Vilcoq JR Conservative treatment of early breast cancer: Prognostic value of the ductal in situ component and other pathological variables on local control and survival. Long-term results Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 1989, 25:1645-1650 10.1016/0277-5379(89)90311-8 2556282
93. Kurtz JM Jacquemier J Amalric R Brandone H Ayme Y Hans D Bressac C Spitalier JM Why are local recurrences after breast-conserving therapy more frequent in younger patients? J Clin Oncol 1990, 8:591-598 2313329
94. Jacquemier J Kurtz JM Amalric R Brandone H Ayme Y Spitalier JM An assessment of extensive intraductal component as a risk factor for local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy Br J Cancer 1990, 61:873-876 2164836
95. Boyages J Recht A Connolly JL Schnitt SJ Gelman R Kooy H Love S Osteen RT Cady B Silver B Harris JR Early breast cancer: Predictors of breast recurrence for patients treated with conservative surgery and radiation therapy Radiother Oncol 1990, 19:29-41 10.1016/0167-8140(90)90163-Q 2173044
96. Vicini FA Eberlein TJ Connolly JL Recht A Abner A Schnitt SJ Silen W Harris JR The optimal extent of resection for patients with stages I or II breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and radiotherapy Ann Surg 1991, 214:200-204 discussion 204-5. 1358631 1656901 10.1097/ 00000658-199109000-00002