Detection of residual disease following breast-conserving surgery

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 85, Issue 9, 1998, Pages 1273-1276

  Beck, N E ^c   Bradburn, M J ^b   Vincenti, A C ^a   Rainsbury, R M ^a  

^a ROYAL HAMPSHIRE COUNTY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c JOHN RADCLIFFE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CLINICAL TRIAL; EXCISION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MINIMAL RESIDUAL DISEASE; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICS; TUMOR BIOPSY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA IN SITU; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASTECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM, RESIDUAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0031661685     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00876.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. McCormick B, Kinne D, Petrek J, Osborne M, Cox L, Shank B et al. Limited resection for breast cancer: a study of inked specimen margins before radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1987; 13: 1667-71.
2. Fisher B, Anderson S, Redmond CK, Wolmark N, Wickerham DL, Cronin WM. Reanalysis and results after 12 years of follow-up in a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy with lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 1456-61.
3. Sauer R, Schauer A, Rauschecker HF, Schumacher M, Gatzemeier W, Schmoor C et al. Therapy of small breast cancer: a prospective study on 1036 patients with special emphasis on prognostic factors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1992; 23: 907-14.
4. Bader J, Lipman M, Swain S, Danfort D, MacDonald H, Gerber L et al. Preliminary report of the NCl early breast cancer (BC) study: a prospective randomised comparison of lumpectomy (L) and radiation (XRT) to mastectomy (M) for stage 1 and 2 BC. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1987; 13: 160 (Abstract).
5. Harris JR, Recht A, Amalric R, Calle R, Clark RM, Reid JG et al. Time course and prognosis of local recurrence following primary radiation therapy for early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1984; 2: 37-41.
6. Kurtz JM. Factors influencing the risk of local recurrence in the breast. Eur J Cancer 1992; 28: 660-6.
7. Locker AP, Ellis IO, Morgan DAL, Elston CW, Mitchell A, Blamey RW. Factors influencing local recurrence after excision and radiotherapy for primary breast cancer. Br J Surg 1989; 76: 890-4.
8. Clarke DH, Le MG, Sarrazin D, Lacombe MJ, Fontaine F, Travagli JP et al. Analysis of local-regional relapses in patients with early breast cancers treated by excision and radiotherapy: experience of the Institut Gustave-Roussy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1985; 11: 137-45.
9. Schnidt-Ullrich R, Wazer DE, Tercilla O, Safaii H, Marchant DJ, Smith TJ et al. Tumor margin assessment as a guide to optimal conservation surgery and irradiation in early stage breast carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1989; 17: 733-8.
10. Zafrani B, Vielh P, Fourquet A, Mosservi V, Durand JC, Salmon RJ et al. Conservative treatment of early breast cancer: prognostic value of ductal in situ component and other pathological variables on local control and survival. Long-term results. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 1989; 25: 1645-50.
11. Kurtz JM, Jacquemier J, Amalric R, Brandone H, Ayme Y, Hans D et al. Why are local recurrences after breast conserving therapy more frequent in younger patients? J Clin Oncol 1990; 8: 591-8.
12. Deutsch M. The segmental mastectomy margin: do millimetres matter? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1991; 21: 521-2 (Editorial).
13. Fisher ER, Sass R, Fisher B, Gregorio R, Brown R, Wickerham L. Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (protocol 6) II. Relation of local breast recurrence to multicentricity. Cancer 1986; 57: 1717-24.
14. Rubin P, O'Hanlon D, Browell D, Callanan K, Shrimankar J, Scott D et al. Tumour bed biopsy detects the presence of multifocal disease in patients undergoing breast conservation therapy for primary breast carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 1996; 22: 23-6.
15. Chinyama CN, Davies JD, Rayter Z, Farndon JR. Factors affecting surgical margin clearance in screen-detected breast cancer and the effect of cavity biopsies on residual disease. Eur J Surg Oncol 1997; 23: 123-7.
16. Macmillan RD, Purushotham AD, Mallon E, Ramsay G, George WD. Breast-conserving surgery and tumour bed positivity in patients with breast cancer. Br J Surg 1994; 81: 56-8.
17. National Coordinating Group of Breast Screening Pathology. Pathology Reporting in Breast Cancer Screening. NHS BSP, Sheffield. Publication no. 2. 2nd ed. 1995: 22-6, 28-9.
18. 1-2 breast carcinomas. Implications for clinical trials of breast-conserving surgery. Cancer 1985; 56: 979-90.
19. Veronesi U. How important is the assessment of resection margins in conservative surgery for breast cancer? Cancer 1994; 74: 1660-1.
20. Carter D. Margins of 'lumpectomy' for breast cancer. Hum Pathol 1986; 17: 330-2.
21. Schnitt SJ, Abner A, Gelman R, Connolly JL, Recht A, Duda RB et al. The relationship between microscopic margins of resection and the risk of local recurrence in patients with breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy. Cancer 1994; 74: 1746-51.
22. Kurtz JM, Amalric R, Delouche G, Pierquin B, Roth J, Spitalier JM. The second ten years: long-term risks of breast conservation in early breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1987; 13: 1327-32.
23. Veronesi U, Salvadori B, Luini A, Banfi A, Zucali R, Del Vecchio M et al. Conservative treatment of early breast cancer. Long-term results of 1232 cases treated with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy. Ann Surg 1990; 211: 250-9.