Oncologic and aesthetic results following breast-conserving therapy with 0.5 cm margins in 100 consecutive patients

Breast Journal

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 208-211

  Fedorcik, Gregory G ^a   Sachs, Robyn ^a   Goldfarb, Michael A ^a,b  

^a MONMOUTH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Aesthetic result; Breast conserving therapy; Margin

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; BREAST AREOLA; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CONSERVING THERAPY; BREAST DUCT; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; CANCER INVASION; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER SIZE; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CHI SQUARE TEST; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DUCTAL BREAST CARCINOMA IN SITU; ESTHETICS; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTECTOMY; NIPPLE; OBSERVATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIATION DOSE; RATING SCALE; REOPERATION; SCAR; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33646259716     PISSN: 1075122X     EISSN: 15244741     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2006.00243.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Blichert-Toft M Rose C Andersen JA et al. Danish randomized trial comparing breast conservation therapy with mastectomy. Six years of life-table analysis J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1992 11 19 25
2. Fisher B Anderson S Bryant J et al. Twenty year follow-up of a randomized trail comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer N Engl J Med 2002 347 1233 41
3. Wood AJ Treatment of breast cancer N Engl J Med 1998 339 974 83
4. Curran D VanDongen JP Aaronson NK et al. Quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients treated with radical mastectomy or breast-conserving procedures: results of EORTC trial 10801 Eur J Cancer 1998 34 307 14
5. Matory WE Wertheimer M Fitzgerald TJ et al. Aesthetic results following partial mastectomy and radiation therapy Plast Reconstr Surg 1990 85 739
6. Ferreira MC Evaluation of results in aesthetic plastic surgery: preliminary observations on mammaplasty Plast Reconstr Surg 2000 106 1630 35
7. Anureet B Philantha K Kerby O et al. Aesthetic outcomes in patients undergoing breast conservation therapy for the treatment of localized breast cancer Plast Reconstr Surg 2004 114 1442 49
8. Veronesi U Volterrani F Luini A et al. Quadrantectomy versus lumpectomy for small size breast cancer Eur J Cancer 1990 26 671 73
9. Smitt M Nowels K Carlson R et al. Predictors of re-excision findings and recurrence after breast conservation Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003 57 979 85
10. Taghian A Mohiuddin M Jagsi R et al. Current perceptions regarding surgical margin status after breast-conserving therapy Ann Surg 2005 241 629 39
11. Schmidt-Ullrich R Wazer DE Tercilla O et al. Tumor margin assessment as a guide to optimal conservation surgery and irradiation in early stage breast carcinoma Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1989 17 733 38
12. Solin LJ Fowble BL Schultz DJ et al. The significance of the pathology margins of the tumor excision on the outcome of patients treated with definitive irradiation for early stage breast cancer Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1991 21 279 87
13. Wazer DE Schmidt-Ullrich RK Schmid CH et al. The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997 38 291 99
14. Jardines L Fowble B Schultz D et al. Factors associated with a positive reexcision after excisional biopsy for invasive breast cancer Surgery 1995 118 803 9
15. Renton SC Gazet JC Ford HT et al. The importance of the resection margin in conservative surgery for breast cancer Eur J Surg Oncol 1996 22 17 22
16. Holland R Connolly JL Gelman R et al. The presence of an extensive intraductal component following a limited excision correlates with prominent residual disease in the remainder of the breast J Clin Oncol 1990 8 113 18
17. Deutsch M Flickinger J Patient characteristics and treatment factors affecting cosmesis following lumpectomy and breast irradiation Ann Clin Oncol 2003 26 350 53
18. Johansen J Overgaard J Rose C et al. Cosmetic outcome and breast morbidity in breast-conserving treatment - results from the Danish DBCG-82TM national randomized trial in breast cancer Acta Oncol 2002 41 369 80
19. Taylor M Perez C Halverson K et al. Factors influencing cosmetic result after conservation therapy for breast cancer Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995 31 753 64