Systematic cavity shaves reduces close margins and re-excision rates in breast conserving surgery

Breast

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 326-330

  Janes, S E J ^a   Stankhe, M ^a   Singh, S ^a   Isgar, B ^a  

^a NEW CROSS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Breast conserving surgery; Cavity shave; Intraoperative radiology; Margin assessment

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST SURGERY; CANCER GRADING; CONTROLLED STUDY; ESTHETICS; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL RECORD; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ORGAN WEIGHT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; REOPERATION; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUMOR VOLUME;

EID: 33744522796     PISSN: 09609776     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2005.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Fisher B., Redmond C., Poisson R., et al. Eight-year results of a randomised clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Eng J Med 320 (1989) 822-828
2. Veronesi U., Salvasori B., and Luini A. Conservation treatment of early breast cancer: long-term results of 1232 cases treated with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy. Ann Surg 211 (1990) 250-259
3. Barthelmes L., Al Awa A., and Crawford D.J. Effect of cavity margin shavings to ensure completeness of excision on local recurrence rates following breast conserving surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 29 (2003) 644-648
4. Beck N.E., Bradburn M.J., Vincenti A.C., and Rainsbury R.M. Detection of residual disease following breast-conserving surgery. Br J Surg 85 (1998) 1273-1276
5. Mullenix P.S., Cuadrado D.G., Steele S.R., Martin M.J., See C.S., Beitler A.L., et al. Secondary operations are frequently required to complete the surgical phase of therapy in the era of breast conservation and sentinel lymph node biopsy. Am J Surg 187 (2004) 643-646
6. Malik H.Z., George W.D., Mallon E.A., Harnett A.N., Macmillan R.D., and Purushotham A.D. Margin assessment by cavity shaving after breast conserving surgery: analysis and follow-up of 543 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 25 (1999) 464-469
7. Smitt M.C., Nowels K., Carlson R.W., and Jeffrey S.S. Predictors of reexcision and recurrence after breast conservation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57 (2003) 979-985
8. Macmillan R.D., Purushotham A.D., Mallon E., Love J.G., and George W.D. Tumour bed positivity predicts outcome after breast-conserving surgery. Br J Surg 84 (1997) 1559-1562
9. 1-2 breast carcinomas. Implications for clinical trials of breast conserving surgery. Cancer 56 (1985) 979-990
10. Fleming F.J., Hill A.D., Mc Dermott E.W., O'Doherty A., O'Higgins N.J., and Quinn C.M. Intraoperative margin assessment and re-excision rate in breast conserving surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 30 (2004) 233-277
11. Motomura K., Koyama H., Noguchi S., Inaji H., Kasugai T., and Nagumo S. Malignant seeding of the lumpectomy cavity upon breast-conserving surgery. Oncology 57 (1999) 121-126
12. Gibson G.R., Lsnikoski B.A., Yoo J., et al. A comparison of ink-directed and traditional whole-cavity re-excision for breast lumpectomy specimens with positive margins. Ann Surg Oncol 8 (2001) 693-704
13. Singletray S.E. Surgical margins in patients with early stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Am J Surg 184 (2002) 383-393
14. Veronesi U. How important is the assessment of resection margins in conservative surgery for breast cancer?. Cancer 74 (1994) 1660-1661
15. Kestin L.L., Goldstein N.S., Lacerna M.D., Balasubramaniam M., Martinez A.A., Rebner M., et al. Factors associated with local recurrence of mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ in patients given breast-conserving therapy. Cancer 88 (2000) 596-607
16. Moorthy K., Asopa V., Wiggins E., and Callam M. Is the reexcision rate higher if breast conservation surgery is performed by surgical trainees?. Am J Surg 188 (2004) 45-48