Prevalence and predictive factors for the detection of carcinoma in cavity margin performed at the time of breast lumpectomy

Modern Pathology

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 299-305

  Tengher Barna, Iulia ^a   Hequet, Delphine ^a   Reboul Marty, Jeanne ^a   Frassati Biaggi, Annonciade ^a   Seince, Nathalie ^a   Rodrigues Faure, Anabela ^a   Uzan, Michèle ^a   Ziol, Marianne ^a  

^a HÔPITAL JEAN VERDIER   (France)

Author keywords

Breast carcinoma; Breast conserving surgery; Histopathology; Lumpectomy; Margin

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CARCINOMA; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL STUDY; DISEASE DURATION; EXCISION; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RISK FACTOR; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE; THORACIC CAVITY; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REOPERATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUMOR BURDEN;

EID: 59149087154     PISSN: 08933952     EISSN: 15300285     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2008.186     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Blichert-Toft M, Rose C, Anderson JA. Danish randomized trial comparing breast conservation therapy with mastectomy: six years of life-table analysis. Monogr Natl Cancer Inst 1992;11:19-25.
2. Kurtz JM. Factors influencing the risk of local recurrence in the breast. Eur J Cancer 1992;28:660-666.
3. Macmillan RD, Purushotham AD, George WD. Local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer. Br J Surg 1996;83:149-155.
4. Singletary SE. Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Am J Surg 2002;184:383-393.
5. Fisher B, Anderson S, Fisher ER, et al. Significance of ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence after lumpectomy. Lancet 1991;338:327-331.
6. Taghian A, Mohiuddin M, Jagsi R, et al. Current perceptions regarding surgical margin status after breast-conserving therapy: results of a survey. Ann Surg 2005;241:629-639.
7. Keskek M, Kothari M, Ardehali B, et al. Factors predisposing to cavity margin positivity following conservation surgery for breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2004;30:1058-1064.
8. Pittinger TP, Maronian NC, Poulter CA, et al. Importance of margin status in outcome of breast-conserving surgery for carcinoma. Surgery 1994;116:605-608.
9. Leong C, Boyages J, Jayasinghe UW, et al. Effect of margins on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast conservation therapy for lymph node-negative breast carcinoma. Cancer 2004;100:1823-1832.
10. Dooley WC, Parker J. Understanding the mechanisms creating false positive lumpectomy margins. Am J Surg 2005;190:606-608.
11. Cao D, Lin C, Woo SH, et al. Separate cavity margin sampling at the time of initial breast lumpectomy significantly reduces the need for reexcisions. Am J Surg Pathol 2005;29:1625-1632.
12. Barthelmes L, Al Awa A, Crawford DJ. Effect of cavity margin shavings to ensure completeness of excision on local recurrence rates following breast conserving surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 2003;29:644-648.
13. Malik HZ, Wilkinson L, George WD, et al. Preoperative mammographic features predict clinicopathological risk factors for the development of local recurrence in breast cancer. Breast 2000;9:329-333.
14. Andea AA, Wallis T, Newman LA, et al. Pathologic analysis of tumor size and lymph node status in multifocal/multicentric breast carcinoma. Cancer 2002;94:1383-1390.
15. Huston TL, Pigalarga R, Osborne MP, et al. The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the preoperative rate after breast-conserving surgery. Am J Surg 2006;192:509-512.
16. Rubin P, O'Hanlon D, Browell D, et al. Tumour bed biopsy detects the presence of multifocal disease in patients undergoing breast conservation therapy for primary breast carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 1996;22:23-26.
17. Scopa CD, Aroukatos P, Tsamandas AC, et al. Evaluation of margin status in lumpectomy specimens and residual breast carcinoma. Breast J 2006;12:150-153.
18. Aziz D, Rawlinson E, Narod SA, et al. The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer. Breast J 2006;12:331-337.
19. Balch GC, Mithani SK, Simpson JF, et al. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy. Am Surg 2005;71:22-27.
20. Tartter PI, Kaplan J, Bleiweiss I, et al. Lumpectomy margins, reexcision, and local recurrence of breast cancer. Am J Surg 2000;179:81-85.
21. Luu HH, Otis CN, Reed Jr WP, et al. The unsatisfactory margin in breast cancer surgery. Am J Surg 1999;178:362-366.