Assessing margin status

Surgical Oncology

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 77-84

  Klimberg, V Suzanne ^a,b   Harms, Steve ^a   Korourian, Soheila ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CARCINOMA; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER STAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTECTOMY; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

EID: 0033507275     PISSN: 09607404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0960-7404(99)00031-6     Document Type: Short Survey

References (56)

1. National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference. Treatment of early-stage breast cancer. Journal of the American Medical Association 1991;265:391-5.
2. Wazer D.E., DePetrillo T., Schmidt-Ullrich R.et al. Factors influencing cosmetic outcome and complication risk after conservative surgery and radiotherapy for early-stage breast carcinoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 10:1992;356-363.
3. Spivack B., Khanna M.M., Tafra L., Juillard G., Giuliano A.E. Margin status and local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery. Archives of Surgery. 129:1994;952-957.
4. Schnitt S.J., Abner A., Gelman R., Connolly J.L. The relationship between microscopic margins of resection and the risk of local recurrence in patients with breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy. Cancer. 74:1994;1746-1751.
5. Mokbel K., Ahmed M., Nash A., Sacks N. Re-excision operations in nonpalpable breast cancer. Journal of Surgical Oncology. 58(4):1995;225-228.
6. Clarke K., Le M.G., Sarrazin D., Lacombe M.J., Fontaine F., Travagli J.P., May-Levine F. Analysis of local-regional relapses in patients with early breast cancers treated by excision and radiotherapy. experience of the Institute Gustave-Roussy International Journal of Radiation Oncology and Biological Physics. 11:1985;137-145.
7. Hustreich D.J., Dunn J.M., Armstrong J.S.et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of fine wire localization biopsy for impalpable breast cancer. British Journal of Surgery. 79:1992;1038-1041.
8. Boyages J., Delaney G., Taylor R. Predictors of local recurrence after treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ. a meta-analysis Cancer. 85(3):1999;616-628.
9. Page D.L., Lagios M.D. Pathologic analysis of the National Surgical Adjuvant breast Project (NSABP) B-17 Trial. Cancer. 75:1995;1219-1222.
10. Baines C.J., Dayan R. A tangled web. factors likely to affect the efficacy of screening mammography Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 91(10):1999;833-838.
11. Jardines L., Fowble B., Mackie J.et al. Factors associated with a positive reexcision afterexcisional biopsy for invasive breast cancer. Surgery. 118(5):1995;803-809.
12. Schmidt-Ullrich R., Wazer D., Tercilla O.et al. Tumor margin assessment as a guide to optimal conservation surgery and irradiation in early-stage breast carcinoma. International Journal of Radiation Oncology and Biological Physics. 17:1989;733-738.
13. Aitken R.J., Going J.J., Chetty U. Assessment of surgical excision during breast conservation surgery by intraoperative two-dimensional specimen radiology. British Journal of Surgery. 77:1990;322-323.
14. Hall F.M., Houlihan M.J., Baum J.K. Efficacy of specimen radiography in evaluating the surgical margins of impalpable breast carcinoma. American Journal of Roentgenology. 162(1):1993;33-36.
15. Morrow M., Schmidt R., Hassett C. Patient selection for breast conservation therapy with magnification mammography. Surgery. 118:1995;621-626.
16. Raptopoulos V., Baum J.K., Hochman M.et al. High resolution CT Mammography of surgical biopsy specimens. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography. 20:1996;179-184.
17. Cox C.E., Reintgen D.S., Nicosia S.V.et al. Analysis of residual cancer after diagnostic breast biopsy. an argument for fine-needle aspiration cytology Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2(3):1996;201-206.
18. King T.A., Cederbom G.J., Champaign J.L.et al. A core breast biopsy diagnosis of invasive carcinoma allows for definitive surgical treatment planning. American Journal of Surgery. 176(6):1998;497-501.
19. Acosta J.A., Greenlee J.A., Gubler D.O., Goepfert C.J., Ragland J.J. Surgical margins after needle-localization breast biopsy. American Journal of Surgery. 170:1995;643-646.
20. Papa M.Z., Klein E., Davidson B.et al. The effect of anesthesia type on needle localization breast biopsy. another point of view American Journal of Surgery. 171(2):1996;242-243.
21. Kolb T.M., Lichy J., Newhouse J.H. Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US - diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. Radiology. 207(!):1998;191-199.
22. Harms S.E. Integration of breast magnetic resonance imaging with breast cancer treatment. Top Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 9(2):1998;79-91.
23. Soderstrom C.E., Harms S.E., Copit D.S.et al. 3D RODEO breast MRI of lesions containing ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiology. 201:1996;427-432.
24. Holaday W.J., Assor D. Ten thousand consecutive frozen section. a retrospective study focusing on accuracy and quality control American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 61:1974;769-777.
25. Lessells A.M., Simpson J.G. A retrospective analysis of the accuracy of immediate frozen section diagnosis in surgical pathology. British Journal of Surgery. 63:1976;327-329.
26. Nakazawa H., Rosen P., Lane N., Lattes R. Frozen section experience in 3,000 cases. accuracy, limitations and value in residency training American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 49:1968;41-51.
27. Rosai J., Ackerman L.V. The pathology of tumors. Part II. diagnostic techniques Clinical Anesthesia. 29:1979;22-39.
28. Shidham V.B., Dravid N.V., Grover S., Kher A.V. Role of scrape cytology in rapid intraoperative diagnosis. value and limitations Acta Cytologica. 28:1984;477-482.
29. Abraham S.C., Fox K., Fraker D., Solin L., Reynolds C. Sampling of grossly benign reexcisions. a multidisciplinary approach to assessing adequacy American Journal of Surgical Pathology. 23(3):1999;316-322.
30. Carter D. Margins of "Lumpectomy" for breast cancer. Human Pathology. 17:1986;330-332.
31. de Mascarel I., Trojani M., Bonichon F., Coindre J.M. Histological examination of 2859 breast biopsies. Analysis of adequate sampling. Pathology Annual. 28:1993;1-13.
32. Lagios M.D., Bennington J.L. Protocol for the pathologic examination and tissue processing of the mammographically directed breast biopsy. Pathology. 1(1):1992;23-45.
33. DiBiase S.J., Komarnicky L.T., Schwartz G.F., Xie Y., Mansfield C.M. The number of positive margins influences the outcome of women treated with breast preservation for early stage breast carcinoma. Cancer. 82(11):1998;2212-2220.
34. Shaw EH, The immediate microscopic diagnosis of tumours at the time of operation. Lancet 1910.
35. Dudgeon L.S., Patrick C.V. A new method for the rapid microscopical diagnosis of tumours. British Journal of Surgery. 15:1927;250-1161.
36. Tribe C.R. A comparison of rapid methods including imprint cytodiagnosis for the diagnosis of breast tumours. Journal of Clinical Pathology. 26:1973;273-277.
37. Cox C.E., Ku N.K., Reintgen D.S., Greenberg H.M., Nicosia S.V., Wangensteen S. Touch preparation cytology of breast lumpectomy margins with histologic correlation. Archives of Surgery. 126:1991;490-493.
38. Ku N.K., Cox C.E., Reintgen D.S., Greenberg H.M., Nicosia S.V. Cytology of lumpectomy specimens. Acta Cytologica. 35(4):1991;417-421.
39. Klimberg V.S., Westbrook K.C., Korourian S. Use of touch preps for diagnosis and evaluation of surgical margins in breast cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 5(3):1998;220-226.
40. Esteban J.M., Zaloudek C., Silverberg S.G. Intraoperative diagnosis of breast lesions - Comparison of cytologic with frozen section techniques. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 88(6):1987;681-688.
41. Silverman J.F. Breast. Bibbo M Comprehensive cytopathology. 1991;Sanders, New York.
42. Tinnemans J.G.M., Wobbes T., Holland R., Hendriks J.H.C.L., van der Sluis R.F., Lubbers E.-J.C., de Boer H.H.M. Mammographic and histopathologic correlation of nonpalpable lesions of the breast and the reliability of frozen section diagnosis. Surgery Gynecology and Obstetrics. 165:1987;523-529.
43. Ferreiro J.A., Gisvold J.J., Bostwick D.G. Accuracy of frozen-section diagnosis of mammographically directed breast biopsies - Results of 1,490 consecutive cases. American Journal of Surgical Pathology. 19(11):1995;1267-1271.
44. Fessia L., Ghiringhello B., Arisio R., Botta G., Aimone V. Accuracy of frozen section diagnosis in breast cancer detection. A review of 4436 biopsies and comparison with cytodiagnosis. Pathological Research Practice. 179:1984;61-66.
45. Cox C.E., Pendas S., Ku N.N.et al. Local recurrence of breast cancer after cytological evaluation of lumpectomy margins. American Surgeon. 64(6):1998;533-537.
46. Bartelink H., Borger J.H., van Dongen J.A., Peters J.L. The impact of tumor size and histology on local control after breast-conserving therapy. Radiotherapy Oncology. 11:1988;297-303.
47. Solin L.J., Fowble B.L., Schultz D.J., Goodman R.L. The significance of the pathology margins of the tumor excision on the outcome of patients treated with definitive irradiation for early-stage breast cancer. International Journal of Radiation Oncology and Biological Physics. 21:1991;279-287.
48. Pezner R.D., Lipsett J.A., Desai K., Vora N., Terz J., Hill L.R., Luk K.H. To boost or not to boost. decreasing radiation therapy in conservative breast cancer treatment when "inked" tumor resection margins are pathologically free of cancer International Journal of Radiation Oncology and Biological Physics. 14:1988;873-877.
49. Ryoo M.C., Kagan A.R., Woolin M., Tome M.A., Tedeschi M.A., Rao A.R., Hintz B.L.et al. Prognostic factors for recurrence and cosmesis in 393 patients after radiation therapy for early mammary carcinoma. Radiology. 172:1989;555-559.
50. Fourquet A., Campana F., Zafrani B., Messeri V., Vileh P., Durand J.C., Vilcoq J.R. Prognostic factors of breast recurrence in the conservative management of early breast cancer. a 25-year follow-up International Journal of Radiation Oncology and Biological Physics. 17:1989;719-725.
51. Hallahan D.E., Michel A.G., Halpern H.J., Awan A.M., Desser R., Bitran J., Recant W.et al. Breast-conserving surgery and definitive irradiation for early-stage breast cancer. International Journal of Radiation Oncology and Biological Physics. 17:1989;1211-1216.
52. Kurtz JN, Jacquemier J, Amalric K, et al. Why are local recurrences after breast-conserving surgery more frequent in young patients? Journal of Clinical Oncology 1990;8:591-8.
53. Anscher M.S., Jones P., Prosnitz L.R.et al. Local failure and margin status in early-stage breast carcinoma treated with conservation surgery and radiation therapy. Annals of Surgery. 218:1993;22-28.
54. Sakai Y., Lanslanti K. Comparison and analysis of the results of cytodiagnosis and frozen sections during operation. Acta Cytologica. 13:1969;359-368.
55. Helpap B., Tschubel K. The significance of imprint cytology in breast biopsy diagnosis. Acta Cytologica. 22:1978;133-137.
56. Suen K., Wood W., Syed A., Quenville N., Clement P. Role of imprint cytology in intraoperative diagnosis. value and limitations Journal of Clincial Pathology. 31:1978;328-337.