Importance of routine cavity sampling in breast conservation surgery

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 96, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 47-53

  Hewes, J C ^a   Imkampe, A ^a   Haji, A ^a   Bates, T ^a  

^a WILLIAM HARVEY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CHEMOTHERAPY, ADJUVANT; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LYMPH NODE EXCISION; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; RADIOTHERAPY, ADJUVANT; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 58149503860     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: 13652168     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.6435     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Jacobson JA, Danforth DN, Cowan KH, d'Angelo T, Steinberg SM, Pierce L et al. Ten-year results of a comparison of conservation with mastectomy in the treatment of stage I and II breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 907-911.
2. Veronesi U, Salvadori B, Luini A, Greco M, Saccozzi R, del Vecchio M et al. Breast conservation is a safe method in patients with small cancer of the breast. Long-term results of three randomised trials on 1973 patients. Eur J Cancer 1995; 31A: 1574-1579.
3. Veronesi U, Salvadori B, Luini A, Banfi A, Zucali R, del Vecchio M et al. Conservative treatment of early breast cancer. Long-term results of 1232 cases treated with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy. Ann Surg 1990; 211: 250-259.
4. Fisher B, Anderson S, Redmond CK, Wolmark N, Wickerham DL, Cronin WM. Reanalysis and results after 12 years of follow-up in a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy with lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 1456-1461.
5. van Dongen JA, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS, Legrand C, Sylvester RJ, Tong D et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92: 1143-1150.
6. Blichert-Toft M, Rose C, Andersen JA, Overgaard M, Axelsson CK, Andersen KW et al. Danish randomized trial comparing breast conservation therapy with mastectomy: six years of life-table analysis. Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1992; 11: 19-25.
7. Delouche G, Bachelot F, Premont M, Kurtz JM. Conservation treatment of early breast cancer: long term results and complications. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1987; 13: 29-34.
8. Clarke M, Collins R, Darby S, Davies C, Elphinstone P, Evans E et al. Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 2005; 366: 2087-2106.
9. Haga S, Makita M, Shimizu T, Watanabe O, Imamura H, Kajiwara T et al. Histopathological study of local residual carcinoma after simulated lumpectomy. Surg Today 1995; 25: 329-333.
10. Wazer DE, Schmidt-Ullrich RK, Schmid CH, Ruthazer R, Kramer B, Safaii H et al. The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997; 38: 291-299.
11. Beck NE, Bradburn MJ, Vincenti AC, Rainsbury RM. Detection of residual disease following breast-conserving surgery. Br J Surg 1998; 85: 1273-1276.
12. Veronesi U, Luini A, del Vecchio M, Greco M, Galimberti V, Merson M et al. Radiotherapy after breast-preserving surgery in women with localized cancer of the breast. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 1587-1591.
13. Peterson ME, Schultz DJ, Reynolds C, Solin LJ. Outcomes in breast cancer patients relative to margin status after treatment with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy: the University of Pennsylvania experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999; 43: 1029-1035.
14. Park CC, Mitsumori M, Nixon A, Recht A, Connolly J, Gelman R et al. Outcome at 8 years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer: influence of margin status and systemic therapy on local recurrence. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18: 1668-1675.
15. Holland R, Veling SH, Mravunac M, Hendriks JH. Histologic multifocality of Tis, T1-2 breast carcinomas. Implications for clinical trials of breast-conserving surgery. Cancer 1985; 56: 979-990.
16. Malik HZ, George WD, Mallon EA, Harnett AN, Macmillan RD, Purushotham AD. Margin assessment by cavity shaving after breast-conserving surgery: analysis and follow-up of 543 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 1999; 25: 464-469.
17. Keskek M, Kothari M, Ardehali B, Betambeau N, Nasiri N, Gui GP. Factors predisposing to cavity margin positivity following conservation surgery for breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2004; 30: 1058-1064.
18. Cao D, Lin C, Woo SH, Vang R, Tsangaris TN, Argani P. Separate cavity margin sampling at the time of initial breast lumpectomy significantly reduces the need for reexcisions. Am J Surg Pathol 2005; 29: 1625-1632.
19. Malik HZ, Purushotham AD, Mallon EA, George WD. Influence of tumour bed assessment on local recurrence following breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 1999; 25: 265-268.
20. Taylor I, Mullee MA, Carpenter R, Royle G, McKay CJ, Cross M. The significance of involved tumour bed biopsy following wide local excision of breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 1998; 24: 110-113.
21. Macmillan RD, Purushotham AD, Mallon E, Ramsay G, George WD. Breast-conserving surgery and tumour bed positivity in patients with breast cancer. Br J Surg 1994; 81: 56-58.
22. Barthelmes L, Al Awa A, Crawford DJ. Effect of cavity margin shavings to ensure completeness of excision on local recurrence rates following breast conserving surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 2003; 29: 644-648.
23. Macmillan RD, Purushotham AD, Mallon E, Love JG, George WD. Tumour bed positivity predicts outcome after breast-conserving surgery. Br J Surg 1997; 84: 1559-1562.