A pleasure working together? The effects of dissimilarity in team member conscientiousness on team temporal processes and individual satisfaction

Journal of Organizational Behavior

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 379-400

  Gevers, Josette M P ^a   Peeters, Miranda A G ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67749120251     PISSN: 08943796     EISSN: 10991379     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/job.544     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Adams, J. R., & Barndt, S. E. (1983). Behavioral implications of the project life cycle. In D. I. Cleland, & W. R. King (Eds.), Project management handbook (pp. 183-204). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.
2. Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management, 39, 1154-1184.
3. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
4. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
5. Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J., & Mount, M. K. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 43-51.
6. Bentler, P. M., & Bonnet, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
7. Bernieri, F. J., Zuckerman, M., Koestner, R., & Rosenthal, R. (1994). Measuring person perception accuracy: Another look at self-other agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 439-450.
8. Blickensderfer, E., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (1997). Theoretical bases for team self-correction: Forstering shared mental models. In M. Beyerlein, D. Johnson, & S. Beyerlein (Eds.), Advances in inter-disciplinary studies in work teams series (Vol. 4, pp. 249-279). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
9. Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability. In K. J. Klein, & S. J. W. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, methods, and research in organizations (pp. 349-381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
11. Brannick, M. T., & Prince, T. (1997). An overview of team performance measures. In E. Salas, & C. Prince (Eds.), Team performance assessment and measurement (pp. 3-16). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
13. Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46, 823-845.
14. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2000). Perspectives on personality (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
15. Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234-246.
16. Cohen, S. G. (1994). Designing effective SMWTs. In M. M. Beyerlein, & D. A. Johnson (Eds.), Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams (Vol. 1, pp. 67-102). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
17. De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance and team members satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741-749.
18. Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 39, 1-38.
19. Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
20. Dormann, C., & Zapf, D. (2002). Social stressors at work, irritation, and depressive symptoms: Accounting for unmeasured third variables in a multi-wave study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 33-58.
21. Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290-309.
22. Funder, D. C., Kolar, D. C., & Blackman, M. C. (1995). Agreement among judges of personality: Interpersonal relations, similarity, and acquaintanceship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229.
23. Gelade, G. A. (2002). Creative style, personality, and artistic endeavor. Genetics, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 128, 213-234.
24. George, J. M. (1990). Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 107-116.
25. George, J. M., & Bettenhausen, K. (1990). Understanding prosocial behavior, sales performance, and turnover: A group-level analysis in a service context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 698-709.
26. George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 513-524.
27. Gersick, C. J. G. (1988). Time and transitions in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9-41.
28. Gersick, C. J. G. (1989). Marking time: Predictable transitions in task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 32,274-309.
29. Gersick, C. J. G., & Hackman, J. R. (1990). Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 65-97.
30. Gevers, J. M. P., Rutte, C. G., & Van Eerde, W. (2004). How work groups achieve coordinated action: A model of shared cognitions on time. In E. A. Mannix, M. A. Neale, & S. Blount (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams: Time in groups (Vol. 6, pp. 67-85). London: Elsevier Press.
31. Gevers, J. M. P., Rutte, C. G., & Van Eerde, W. (2006). Meeting deadlines in work groups: Implicit and explicit mechanisms. Applied Pschychology: An International Review, 55, 52-72.
32. Gevers, J. M. P., Van Eerde, W., & Rutte, C. G. (2009). Team self-regulation and meeting deadlines in project teams: Antecedents and effects of temporal consensus. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology (in press).
33. Gladstein, D. L. (1984). Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29,499-517.
34. Gurtner, A., Tschan, F., Semmer, N. K., & Nägele, C. (2007). Getting groups to develop good strategies: Effects of reflexivity interventions on team process, team perfornmance, and shared mental models. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102, 127-142.
35. Guzzo, R. A., & Shea, G. P. (1992). Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette, & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 269-313). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
36. Hacker, W. (2003). Action regulation theory: A practical tool for the design of modern work processes? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 12, 105-130.
37. Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315-342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
38. Hackman, J. R., Brousseau, K. R., & Weiss, J. A. (1976). The interaction of task design and group performance strategies in determining group effectiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 350-365.
39. Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R. (2005). A theory of team coaching. Academy of Management Journal, 30, 269-287.
40. Halfhill, T., Sundstrom, E., Lahner, J., Calderone, W., & Nielsen, T. M. (2005). Group personality composition and group effectiveness. Small Group Research, 36, 83-105.
41. Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., & Bell, M. P. (1988). Beyond relational demography: Time and the effect of surfaceversus deep-level diversity on group cohesiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 96-107.
42. Hendriks, A. A. J., Hofstee, W. K. B., & De Raad, B. (1999a). De Five-Factor Personality Inventory handleiding [The Five-Factor Personality Inventory manual]. Lisse (NL): Swets Test Publishers.
43. Hendriks, A. A. J., Hofstee, W. K. B., & De Raad, B. (1999b). The Five-Factor Personality Inventory (FFPI). Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 307-325.
44. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to under parameterized model misspecifications. Psychological Methods, 3, 424-453.
45. Jackson, K. M., Mannix, E. A., Peterson, R. S., & Trochim, W. M. K. (2002). A multi-faceted approach to process conflict. IACM 15th Annual Conference.
46. James, L. R., Demarée, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85-98.
47. Janicik, G. A., & Bartel, C. A. (2003). Talking about time: Effects of temporal planning and time awareness norms on group coordination and performance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7, 122-134.
48. Jehn, K. A. (1997). A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 530-557.
49. Jehn, K., & Mannix, E. A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performances. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 238-251.
50. Jehn, K., Northcraft, G., & Neale, M. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741-763.
51. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1996). Lisrel 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
52. Judge, T. A., Heller, D., & Mount, M. K. (2002). Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 530-541.
53. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data-analysis in social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 233-265). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
54. Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2000). Multilevel theory, methods, and research in organizations (pp. 2-90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
55. Klimoski, R., & Mohammed, S. (1994). Team mental model: Construct or metaphor? Journal of Management, 20, 403-437.
56. Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. NY: Guilford Press.
57. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7, 77-124.
58. Lester, S. W., Meglino, B. M., & Korsgaard, M. A. (2002). The antecedents and consequences of group potency: A longitudinal investigation of newly formed work groups. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 352-368.
59. Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356-376.
60. Mathieu, J. E., & Taylor, S. R. (2006). Clarifying conditions and decision points for mediational type references in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 1031-1056.
61. Mathieu, J. E., & Taylor, S. (2007). A framework for testing meso-mediational relationships in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 141-172.
62. McGrath, J. E. (1964). Social psychology: A brief introduction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
63. Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21, 402-433.
64. Mohammed, S., & Angell, L. C. (2004). Surface- and deep-level diversity in workgroups: Examining the moderating effects of team orientation and team processes on relationship conflict. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 1015-1039.
65. Molleman, E., Nauta, A., & Jehn, K. A. (2004). Person-job fit applied to teamwork. A multilevel approach. Small Group Research, 35, 515-539.
66. Nerkar, A. A., McGrath, R. G., & Macmillan, I. C. (1996). Three facets of satisfaction and their influence on the performance of innovation teams. Journal of Business Venturing, 11, 167-188.
67. Peeters, M. A. G., Rutte, C. G., van Tuijl, H. F. J. M., & Reymen, I. M. M. J. (2006). The Big Five personality traits and individual satisfaction with the team. Small Group Research, 37, 187-211.
68. Peeters, M. A. G., van Tuijl, H. F. J. M., Rutte, C. G., & Reymen, I. M. M. J. (2006). Personality and team performance: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Personality, 20, 377-396.
69. Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommendation remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.
70. Porter, T. W., & Lilly, B. S. (1996). The effects of conflict, trust, and task commitment on project team performance. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 7, 361-376.
71. Rico, R., Sánchez-Manzanares, M., Gil, F., & Gibson, C. (2008). Team implicit coordination processes: A team knowledge-based approach. Academy of Management Review, 33, 163-184.
72. Smith-Jentsch, K. A., Zeisig, R. L., Acton, B., & McPherson, J. A. (1998). Team dimensional training. In J. A. Cannon-Bowers, & E. Salas (Eds.), Making decisions under stress: Implications for individual and team training (pp. 271-298). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
73. Spector, P. E. (1997). Job satisfaction. Application, assessment, causes, and consequences. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
74. Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173-180.
75. Stewart, G. L. (2006). A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. Journal of Management, 32, 29-54.
76. Stoeber, J., & Otto, K. (2006). Positive conceptions of perfectionism: Approaches, evidence, challenges. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 295-319.
77. Sundstrom, E., De Meuse, K. P., & Futrell, D. (1990). Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45, 120-133.
78. Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. New York: Academic Press.
79. Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 500-517.
80. Tett, R. P., Jackson, D. N., & Rothstein, M. (1991). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 44, 703-742.
81. Thamhain, H. J., & Wilemon, D. (1975). Conflict management in project life cycle. Sloan Management Review, 53, 122-130.
82. Thompson, L. L. (2004). Making the team: A guide for managers. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
83. Tsui, A. S., Egan, T. D., & O'Reilly, C. A., III. (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 549-579.
84. Tsui, A. S., & O'Reilly, C. A., III. (1989). Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 402-423.
85. Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequences in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384-399.
86. Turner, J. C. (1982). Toward a cognitive definition of the group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15-40). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
87. Van Eerde, W. (2003). An meta-analytically derived nomological network of procrastination. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1401-1418.
88. Van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 1008-1022.
89. Waller, M. J., Conte, J. M., Gibson, C. B., & Carpenter, M. A. (2001). The effect of individual perceptions of deadlines on team performance. Academy of Management Review, 26, 586-600.
90. Waller, M. J., Zellmer-Bruhn, M. E., & Giambatista, R. C. (2002). Watching the clock: Group pacing behavior under dynamic deadlines. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1046-1055.
91. Williams, K. Y., & O'Reilly, C. A., III. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. In L. L. Cummings, & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 20, pp. 77-140). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
92. Zenger, T. R., & Lawrence, B. S. (1989). Organizational demography: The differential effects of age and tenure distributions on technical communication. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 353-376.