Phylogeography: Applications in taxonomy and conservation;Filogeografía: Aplicaciones en taxonomía y conservación

Animal Biodiversity and Conservation

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 59-70

  Dominguez Dominguez O ^a   Vazquez Dominguez E ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD MICHOACANA DE SAN NICOLÁS DE HIDALGO   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Biogeography; DNA; Genealogy; Genetic structure

Indexed keywords

BIOGEOGRAPHY; CONSERVATION; DESIGN; DNA; EDUCATION; GENEALOGY; GENETIC STRUCTURE; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; TAXONOMY;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 67651150025     PISSN: 1578665X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Amato, G., Wharton, D., Zainuddin, Z. Z. & Powell, J. R., 1995. Assessment of conservation units for the Sumatran rhinoceros (Dicerorbinus sumatrensis). Zoo Biology, 14: 395-402.
2. Arbogast, B. S. & Kenagy, G. J., 2001. Comparative phylogeography as an integrative approach to historical biogeography. Journal of Biogeography, 28: 819-825.
3. Avise, J. C., 2000. Phylogeography. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge.
4. Avise, J. C., 2008. Phylogeography: retrospect and prospect. Journal of Biogeography, 36: 3-15.
5. Avise, J. C., Arnold, J., Ball, R. M., Bermingham, E., Lamb, T., Neigel, L. E., Reeb, C. A. & Saunders, N. C., 1987. Intraspecific phylogeography: The mitocondrial DNA bridge between population genetics and systematics. Annual Review in Ecology and Systematics, 18: 489-522.
6. Avise, J. C. & Ball, Jr, R. M., 1990. Principles of genealogical concordance in species concepts and biological taxonomy. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology, 7: 45-67.
7. Avise, J. C. & Hamrick, J. L., 1996. Conservation genetics: case histories from nature. Chapman & Hall, New York.
8. Beheregaray, L. B., Ciofi, C., Caccone, A., Gibbs, J. P. & Powell, J. R., 2003. Genetic divergence, phylogeography and conservation units of giant tortoises from Santa Cruz and Pinzon, Galapagos Islands. Conservation Genetics, 4: 31-46.
9. Cracraft, J., 1983. Species concepts and speciation analysis. Current Ornithology, 1: 159-187.
10. Crandall, K. A., Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., Mace, G. M. & Wayne, R. K., 2000. Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 15: 290-295.
11. Crother, B. I., 1990. Is "some better than none" or do allele frequencies contain phylogenetically useful information? Cladistics, 6: 677-281.
12. Davis, J. I. & Nixon, K. C., 1992. Population, genetic variation, and delimitation of phylogenetic species. Systematic Biology, 41: 421-435.
13. Doadrio, I., Perdices, A. & Machordom, A., 1996. Allozymic variation of the endangered killifish Aphanius iberus and its application to conservation. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 45: 259-271.
14. Dodson, J. J., Gibson, R. J., Cunjak, R. A., Friedland, K. D., Garcia de Leaniz, C., Gross, M. R., Newbury, R., Nielsen, J. L., Power, M. E. & Roy, S., 1998. Elements in the development of conservation plans for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Canadian Journal of Fish and Aquatic Sciences, 55: 312-323.
15. Domínguez-Domínguez, O., Alda, F., Pérez-Ponce de León, G., García-Garitagoitia, J. L. & Doadrio, I., 2008. Evolutionary history of the endangered fish Zoogoneticus quitzeoensis (Bean, 1898) (Cypri-nodontiformes: Goodeidae) using a sequential approach to phylogeography based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA data. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 8: 161.
16. Domínguez-Domínguez, O., Boto, L., Alda, F., Pérez-Ponce de León, G. & Doadrio, I., 2007. Human impacts on drainages of the Mesa Central of Mexico and its genetic effects on an endangered fish, Zoogoneticus quitzeoensis. Conservation Biology, 21: 168-180.
17. Donoghue, M. J., 1985. A critique of the biological species concept and recommendations for a phylogenetic alternative. Bryologist, 88: 172-181.
18. Farias, I. P. & Hrbek, T., 2008. Patterns of diversification in the discus fishes (Symphysodon spp. Cichlidae) of the Amazon basin. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 49: 32-43.
19. Fleischer, R. C., Perry, E. A., Muralidharan, K., Stevens, E. E. & Wemmer, C. M., 2001. Phylogeography of the Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) based on mitochondrial DNA. Evolution, 55: 1882-1892.
20. Freeland, J. R., 2005. Molecular ecology. John Wiley & Sons, England.
21. Gamble, T., Berendzen, P. B., Shaffer, H. B., Starkey, D. E. & Simons, A. M., 2008. Species limits and phylogeography of North American cricket frogs (Acris: Hylidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 48: 112-125.
22. Goldstein, P. Z., DeSalle, R., Amato, G. & Voger, A. P., 2000. Conservation genetics at the species boundary. Conservation Biology, 14: 120-131.
23. Green, D. M., 2005. Designable units for status assessment of endangered species. Conservation Biology, 19: 1813-1820.
24. Hardy, M. E., Grady, J. M. & Routman, E. J., 2002. Intraspecific phylogeography of the slender mad-tom: the complex evolutionary history of the Central Highlans of United States. Molecular Ecology, 11: 2393-2403.
25. Hickerson, M. J., Dolman, G. & Moritz, C., 2006. Comparative phylogeographic summary statistics for testing simultaneous vicariance. Molecular Ecology, 15: 209-223.
26. Hey, J. & Machado, C. A., 2003. The study of structured populations-new hope for a difficult and divided science. Nature Reviews Genetics, 4: 53-543.
27. Hudson, R. R., 1990. Gene genealogies and the coalescent process. In: Oxford surveys in evolutionary biology: 1-44 (D. Futuyma & J. Antonovics, Eds.). Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
28. Hudson, R. R., 1998. Island models and the coalescent process. Molecular Ecology, 7: 413-418.
29. Hull, J. M., Hull, A. C., Sacks, B. N., Smith. J. P. & Ernest, H. B., 2008. Landscape characteristics influence morphological and genetic differentiation in a widespread raptor (Buteo jamaicensis). Molecular Ecology, 17: 810-824.
30. King, T. L. & Burke, T.,1999. Special issue on gene conservation: identification and management of genetic diversity. Molecular Ecology, 8: S1-S3.
31. King, T. L., Switzer, J. F., Morrison, C. L., Eackles, M. S., Young, C. C., Lubinski, B. A. & Cryan, P., 2006. Comprehensive genetic analyses reveal evolutionary distinction of a mouse (Zapus hudsonius preblei) proposed for delisting from the US Endangered Species Act. Molecular Ecology, 15: 4331-4359.
32. Knowles, L. L., 2008. Why does a method that fails continue to be used? Evolution, 62: 2713-2717.
33. Knowles, L. L. & Maddison, W. P., 2002. Statistical phylogeography. Molecular Ecology, 11: 2623-2635.
34. Lanteri, A. & Confalonieri, V., 2003. Filogeografía: objetivos, métodos y ejemplos. In: Una prespectiva latinoamericana de la biogeografía: 185-194 (J. J. Morrone & J. Llorente, Eds.). CONABIO, México.
35. Lara-Ruiz, P., Chiarello, A. G. & Fabri ́cio, R. S., 2008. Extreme population divergence and conservation implications for the rare endangered Atlantic Forest sloth, Bradypus torquatus (Pilosa: Bradypodidae). Biological Conservation, 141: 1332-1342.
36. Loeschcke, V., Tomiuk, V. J. & Jain, S. K., 1994. Conservation genetics. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland.
37. Luck, G. W., Daily, G. C. & Ehrlich, P. R., 2003. Population diversity and ecosystem services. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18: 331-336.
38. Lynch, M., Pfrender, M. K., Spitze, N., Lehman, J., Hicks, D., Allen, L., Latta, M., Ottene, F. & Bogue, J., 1999. The quantitative and molecular genetic architecture of a subdivided species. Evolution, 53: 100-110.
39. Manel, S., Schwartz, M. K., Luikart, G. & Taberlet, P., 2003. Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18: 189-197.
40. McKritrick, M. C. & Zink, R. M., 1988. Species concept in ornithology. Condor, 90: 1-14.
41. Moore, W. S., 1995. Inferring phylogenies from mtDNA variation: mitochondrial-gene trees versus nuclear-gene trees. Evolution, 49: 718-726.
42. Moritz, C., 1994. Defining "evolutionarily significant units" for conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 9: 373-375.
43. Moritz, C., 2002. Strategies to protect biological diversity and the evolutionary processes that sustain it. Systematic Biology, 51: 238-254.
44. Mulcahy, D. G., 2008. Phylogeography and species boundaries of the western North American Nightsnake (Hypsiglena torquata): Revisiting the subspecies concept. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 46: 1095-1115.
45. Neigel, J. E. & Avise J. C., 1986. Phylogenetic relationships of mitocondrial DNA under various demographic models of speciation. In: Evolutionary processes and theory: 515-534 (E. Nevo & D. Karlin, Eds.). Academic Press, New York.
46. Nielsen, R. & Beaumont, M. A., 2009. Statistical inferences in phylogeography. Molecular Ecology, 18: 1034-1047.
47. Nixon, K. C. & Wheler, Q. D., 1990. An amplification of the phylogenetics species concept. Cladistics, 6: 211-223.
48. Nordborg, M., 2000. Coalescent theory. In: Handbook of statistical genetics: 1-37 (D. J. Balding, M. J. Bishop & C. Cannings, Eds). John Wiley & Sons, London.
49. ST: Analysis of population genetic data for conservation. Conservation Genetics, 5: 585-602.
50. Pennock, D. S. & Dimmick, W. D., 1997. Critique of the Evolutionary Significant Unit as a definition for "Distinct Population Segments" under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Conservation Biology, 11: 611-619.
51. Pertoldi, C., Bijlsma, R., Loeschcke, V., 2007. Conservation genetics in a globally changing environment: present problems, paradoxes and future challenges. Biodiversity and Conservation, 16: 4147-4163.
52. Petit, R. J., 2008. The coup de grâce for the nested clade phylogeographic analysis? Molecular Ecology, 17: 516-518.
53. Richlen, M. L., Morton, S. L., Barber, P. H. & Lobel, S. P., 2008. Phylogeography, morphological variation and taxonomy of the toxic dinoflagellate Gambierdiscus toxicus (Dinophyceae). Harmful Algae, 7: 614-629.
54. Ryder, O. A., 1986. Species conservation and systematic: the dilemma of subspecies. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 1: 9-10.
55. Sites Jr., J. W. & Crandall, K. A., 1997. Testing species boundaries in biodiversity studies. Conservation Biology, 11: 1289-1297.
56. Smith, G. R., 1992. Introgression in fishes: significance for paleontology, cladistics, and evolutionary rates. Systematic Biology, 41: 41-57.
57. Storfer, A., Murphy, M. A., Evans, J. S., Goldberg, C. S., Robinson, S., Spear, S. F., Dezzani, R., Demelle, E., Vierling, L. & Waits, L. P., 2007. Putting the "landscape" in landscape genetcs. Heredity, 98: 128-142.
58. Templeton A. R., 1999. Using gene trees to infer species from testable null hypothesis: cohesion species in the Spalax ehrenbergi complex. In: Evolutionay theory and preocesses: Modern perspectives papers in honor of Eviatar Nevo: 171-192 (S. P. Wasser, Ed.). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
59. Templeton A. R., 2001. Using phylogeographic analyses of gene trees to test species status and processes. Molecular Ecology, 10: 779-791.
60. Templeton A. R., 2004. Statistical phylogeography: methods of evaluating and minimizing inference errors. Molecular Ecology, 13: 789-809.
61. Templeton A. R., 2008. Nested clade analysis: an extensively validated method for strong phylogeographic inference. Molecular Ecology, 17: 1877-1880.
62. Templeton A. R., 2009. Statistical hypothesis testing in intraspecific phylogeography: nested clade phylogeographical analysis vs. approximate Bayesian computation. Molecular Ecology, 18: 319-331.
63. Vázquez-Domínguez, E., 2002. Phylogeography, historical patterns and conservation of natural areas. In: Protected areas and the regional planning imperative in North America: 369-378 (G. Nelson, J. C. Day, L. M. Sportza, J. Loucky & C. Va ́squez, Eds.). Univ. of Calgary Press, Canada.
64. Vázquez-Domínguez, E., 2007. Filogeografía y vertebrados. In: La Ecología molecular de plantas y animales: 441-466 (L. Eguiarte, V. Souza, & X. Aguirre, Eds.). INE, Mexico.
65. Vázquez-Domínguez, E., Castañeda-Rico, S., Garrido-Garduño, T. & Gutiérrez-Garci ́a, T. A. (en prensa). Avances metodológicos para el estudio conjunto de la información genética, genealógica y geográfica en análisis evolutivos y de distribución. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural.
66. Vázquez-Domínguez, E., Hernández-Valdés, A., Rojas-Santoyo, A. & Zambrano, L., 2009. Contrasting genetic structure in two codistributed freshwater fish species inhabiting highly seasonal systems. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, 80: 181-192.
67. Vogler, A. P. & DeSalle, R., 1994. Diagnosing units of conservation management. Conservation Biology, 6: 170-178.
68. Williams, H. C., Ormerod, S. J. & Bruford, M. W., 2006. Molecular systematics and phylogeography of the cryptic species complex Baetis rhodani (Ephemeroptera, Baetidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 40: 370-382.
69. Zhang, A. B., Kubota, K., Takami, Y., Kim, J. L., Kim, J. K. & Sota, T., 2005. Species status and phylogeography of two closely related Coptolabrus species (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in South Korea inferred from mitochondrial and nuclear gene sequences. Molecular Ecology, 14: 3823-3841.
70. Zink, R. M., 2002. Methods in comparative phylogeography, and their application to studying evolution in the North American aridlands. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 42: 953-959.