Population diversity and ecosystem services

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 18, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 331-336

  Luck, Gary W ^a   Daily, Gretchen C ^b   Ehrlich, Paul R ^b  

^a CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; EXTINCTION; POPULATION ECOLOGY;

EID: 0038506370     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00100-9     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Wilson E.O. The Diversity of Life. 1992;Harvard University Press.
2. Lawton J.H., May R.M. Extinction Rates. 1995;Oxford University Press.
3. Pimm S.L., et al. The future of biodiversity. Science. 269:1995;347-350.
4. Novacek M.J. The Biodiversity Crisis: Losing What Counts. 2000;American Museum of Natural History.
5. Hughes J.B., et al. The loss of population diversity and why it matters. Raven P.H. Nature and Human Society. 1998;71-83 National Academy Press.
6. Hughes J.B., et al. Population diversity: its extent and extinction. Science. 278:1997;689-692.
7. Ceballos G., Ehrlich P.R. Mammal population losses and the extinction crisis. Science. 296:2002;904-907.
8. Ehrlich P.R., Daily G.C. Population extinction and saving biodiversity. Ambio. 22:1993;64-68.
9. Daily G.C. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. 1997;Island Press.
10. Holmlund C.M., Hammer M. Ecosystem services generated by fish populations. Ecol. Econ. 29:1999;253-268.
11. Bird J.A., et al. The impact of waterfowl foraging on the decomposition of rice straw: mutual benefits for rice growers and waterfowl. J. Appl. Ecol. 37:2000;728-741.
12. Kremen C., et al. Crop pollination from native bees at risk from agricultural intensification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:2002;16812-16816.
13. Lerdau M., Slobodkin L. Trace gas emissions and species-dependent ecosystem services. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:2002;309-312.
14. Okada H. Population diversity of Schismatoglottis irrorata (Araceae) at Malaysian wet tropics with reference to the distribution of B chromosomes. Cytologia. 57:1992;401-407.
15. Van Zyl L.M., et al. Population diversity among Brazilian isolates of Cryphonectria cubensis. For. Ecol. Manage. 112:1998;41-47.
16. Xia J.Q., et al. Regional population diversity of Pyricularia grisea in Arkansas and the influence of host selection. Plant Dis. 84:2000;877-884.
17. Allee W.C., et al. Principles of Animal Ecology. 1949;W.B. Saunders.
18. Andrewartha H.G., Birch L.C. The Distribution and Abundance of Animals. 1954;University of Chicago Press.
19. Begon M., et al. Ecology: Individuals, Populations and Communities. 2nd edn:1990;Blackwell Scientific Publications.
20. Dizon A.E., et al. Re-thinking the stock concept: a phylogeographic approach. Conserv. Biol. 6:1992;24-36.
21. Wells J.V., Richmond M.E. Populations, metapopulations, and species populations: what are they and who should care? Wildl. Soc. Bull. 23:1995;458-462.
22. Berryman A.A. Population: a central concept for ecology? Oikos. 97:2002;439-442.
23. Hedrick P.W. Genetics of Populations. 2nd edn:2000;Jones and Bartlett.
24. Ehrlich P.R. Intrinsic barriers to dispersal in checkerspot butterfly. Science. 134:1961;108-109.
25. Brown I., Ehrlich P.R. Population biology of the checkerspot butterfly, Euphydryas chalcedona: structure of the Jasper Ridge colony. Oecologia. 47:1980;239-251.
26. Hanski I. Metapopulation Ecology. 1999;Oxford University Press.
27. Kearns C.A., et al. Endangered mutualisms: the conservation of plant-pollinator interactions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 29:1998;83-112.
28. Walker B.H. Biodiversity and ecological redundancy. Conserv. Biol. 6:1992;18-23.
29. Walker B.H. Conserving biological diversity through ecosystem resilience. Conserv. Biol. 9:1995;747-752.
30. Ehrlich P.R., Walker B.H. Rivets and redundancy. Bioscience. 48:1998;387.
31. Naeem S. Species redundancy and ecosystem reliability. Conserv. Biol. 12:1998;39-45.
32. Walker B.H., et al. Plant attribute diversity, resilience, and ecosystem function: the nature and significance of dominant and minor species. Ecosystems. 2:1999;95-113.
33. Roll J., et al. Reproductive success increases with local density of conspecifics in a desert mustard (Lesquerella fendleri). Conserv. Biol. 11:1997;738-746.
34. Soulé, M.E. et al. Ecological effectiveness: conservation goals for interactive species. Conserv. Biol. (in press).
35. Greiner R., Cacho O. On the efficient use of a catchment's land and water resources: dryland salinisation in Australia. Ecol. Econ. 38:2001;441-458.
36. Ehrlich P.R. Conservation in temperate forests: what do we need to know and do? For. Ecol. Manage. 85:1996;9-19.
37. Walley K.A., et al. The potential for evolution of heavy metal tolerance in plants. 1. Copper and zinc tolerance in Agrostis tenuis. Heredity. 32:1974;309-319.
38. Ehrlich P.R., et al. Food security, population, and environment. Popul. Dev. Rev. 19:1993;1-32.
39. Vaughan D.A., Chang T.-T. In situ conservation of rice genetic resources. Econ. Bot. 46:1992;368-383.
40. Dobzhansky T. Mendelian populations and their evolution. Am. Nat. 84:1950;401-418.
41. Cody M.L., Overton J.M.C. Short-term evolution of reduced dispersal in island plant populations. J. Ecol. 84:1996;53-61.
42. Ehrlich P.R., et al. Checkerspot butterflies: a historical perspective. Science. 188:1975;221-228.
43. McLaughlin J.F., et al. Climate change hastens population extinctions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:2002;670-674.
44. Shaffer M.L. Minimum population sizes for species conservation. Bioscience. 31:1981;131-134.
45. Soulé M.E. Viable Populations for Conservation. 1987;Cambridge University Press.
46. Nunney L., Campbell K.A. Assessing minimum viable population size: demography meets population genetics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8:1993;234-239.
47. Ryder O. Species conservation and systematics: the dilemma of subspecies. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1:1986;9-10.
48. Moritz C. Defining 'evolutionarily significant units' for conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9:1994;373-375.
49. Crandall K., et al. Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15:2000;290-295.
50. Heal G., et al. Protecting natural capital through ecosystem service districts. Stanford Environ. Law J. 20:2001;333-364.
51. Ehrlich P.R. A World of Wounds: Ecologists and the Human Dilemma. 1997;Ecology Institute.