Putting the 'landscape' in landscape genetics

Heredity

Volumn 98, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 128-142

  Storfer, A ^a   Murphy, M A ^a   Evans, J S ^b   Goldberg, C S ^c   Robinson, S ^c   Spear, S F ^a   Dezzani, R ^c   Delmelle, E ^c   Vierling, L ^c   Waits, L P ^c  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ROCKY MOUNTAIN RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

Author keywords

Landscape ecology; Landscape genetics; Population genetics; Spatial analysis; Spatial sampling; Spatial statistics

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY; LANDSCAPE PROTECTION; POPULATION GENETICS; POPULATION STRUCTURE; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ECOSYSTEM; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; POPULATION GENETICS; REVIEW; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ANIMALS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; ECOSYSTEM; GENETICS; GENETICS, POPULATION; MODELS, GENETIC; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 33847327947     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800917     Document Type: Review

References (147)

1. Adriaensen F, Chardon JP, de Blust G, Swinnen E, Villalba S, Gulinck H et al. (2003). The application of 'least-cost' modeling as a functional landscape model. Landscape Urban Plan 64: 233-247.
2. Aitkenhead MJ, Mustard MJ, McDonald AJS (2004). Using neural networks to predict spatial structure in ecological systems. Ecol Model 179: 393-403.
3. Akçakaya HR (2002). RAMAS Metapop: viability analysis for stage-structured metapopulations (version 4.0). Applied biomathematics: Setauket, New York.
4. Angers B, Magnan P, Plante M, Bernatchez L (1999). Canonical correspondence analysis for estimating spatial and environmental effects on microsatellite gene diversity in brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis). Mol Ecol 8: 1043-1053.
5. Anselin L (1995). Local indicators of spatial association. Geogr Anal 27: 93-115.
6. Antolin M, Savage L, Eisen R (2006). Landscape features influence genetic structure of black-tailed prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus). Landscape Ecol 21: 867-875.
7. Arnaud J-F (2003). Metapopulation genetic structure and migration pathways in the land snail Heliz aspersa: influence of landscape heterogeneity. Landscape Ecol 18: 333-346.
8. Avise J (2000). Phylogeography. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
9. Bailey TC, Gatrell AC (1995). Interactive spatial data analysis. Longman: Harlow, UK.
10. Banks SC, Lindenmayer DB, Ward SJ, Taylor AC (2005). The effects of habitat fragmentation via forestry plantation establishment on spatial genotypic structure in the small marsupial carnivore, Antechinus agilis. Mol Ecol 14: 1667-1680.
11. Barbujani G, Oden NL, Sokal RR (1989). Detecting regions of abrupt change in maps of biological variables. Syst Zool 38: 376-389.
12. Beerli P, Felsenstein J (2001). Maximum likelihood estimation of a migration matrix and effective population sizes in n subpopulations by using a coalescent approach. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 4563-4568.
13. Berry BJL, Baker AM (1968). Geographic Sampling. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
14. Bhattacharya M, Primack RB, Gerwein J (2003). Are roads and railroads barriers to bumblebee movement in a temperate suburban conservation area? Biol Conserv 109: 37-45.
15. Borcard D, Legendre P, Dapeau P (1992). Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73: 1045-1055.
16. Bowcock AM, Ruiz-Linares A, Tomfohrde J, Minch E, Kidd JR, Cavalli-Sforza LL (1994). High resolution of human evolutionary trees with polymorphic microsatellites. Nature 368: 455-457.
17. Breiman L (2001). Random Forests,. University of California: Berkeley, CA.
18. Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ (1984). Classification and Regression Trees. The Wadsworth Statistics/probability series. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL.
19. Broderick D, Idaghdour Y, Korrida A, Hellmich J (2003). Gene flow in great bustard populations across the Strait of Gibraltar as elucidated from excremental PCR and mtDNA sequencing. Conserv Genet 4: 793-800.
20. Bueso M, Angulo J (1999). Criteria for multivariate spatial sampling design based on covariance matrix perubtation. In: Soares A, Gomex-Hernandex J, Froidevaux R (eds). Geostatistics for Environmental Applications. Springer: NY. pp 491-502.
21. Burrough PA (1986). Principles of Geographic Information Systems. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.
22. Castella V, Ruedi M, Excoffier L, Ibanez C, Arlettaz R, Hausser J (2000). Is the Gibraltar Strait a barrier to gene flow for the bat Myotis myotis (Chiroptera Vespertilionidae)? Mol Ecol 9: 1761-1772.
23. Castellano S, Balletto E (2002). Is the partial mantel test inadequate? Evolution 56: 1871-1873.
24. Cegelski C, Waits LP, Anderson NJ (2003). Assessing population structure and gene flow in Montana wolverines (Gulo gulo) using assignment-based approaches. Mol Ecol 12: 2907-2918.
25. Cicero C (2004). Barriers to sympatry between avian sibling species (Paridae: Baeolophus) in local secondary contact. Evolution 58: 1573-1587.
26. Corander J, Marttinen P, Sirén J, Tang J (2006). BAPS: Bayesian Analysis of Population Structure, Manual v. 4.1. Available at: http://www.rni.helsinki.fi/jic/bapspage.html.
27. Coulon A, Cosson JF, Angibault JM, Cargnelutti B, Galan M, Morellet N et al. (2004). Landscape connectivity influences gene flow in a roe deer population inhabiting a fragmented landscape: an individual-based approach. Mol Ecol 13: 2841-2850.
28. Coulon A, Guillot G, Cosson JF, Angibault JMA, Aulagnier S, Cargnelutti B et al. (2006). Genetic structure is influenced by landscape features: empirical evidence from a roe deer population. Mol Ecol 15: 1669-1679.
29. Cressie NAC (1993). Statistics for Spatial Data. Wiley: New York.
30. Déath G, Fabricius KE (2000). Classification and regression trees: a powerful yet simple technique for ecological data analysis. Ecology 81: 3178-3192.
31. Dias PC, Verheyen GR, Raymond M (1996). Source-sink populations in Mediterranean blue tits: evidence using single-locus minisatellite probes. J Evol Biol 9: 965-978.
32. Diggle PJ (2003). Statistical Analysis of Spatial Point Patterns. Academic Press: New York.
33. Dodd CK, Barichivich WJ, Smith LL (2004). Effectiveness of a barrier wall and culverts in reducing wildlife mortality on a heavily traveled highway in Florida. Biol Conserv 118: 619-631.
34. Dungan JL, Perry JN, Dalehgb MRT, Legendre P, Citron-Pousty S, Fortin MJ et al. (2002). A balanced view of scale in statistical analysis. Ecography 25: 626-640.
35. Dupanloup I, Schneider S, Excoffier L (2002). A simulation annealing approach to define the genetic structure of populations. Mol Ecol 11: 2571-2581.
36. Epperson B (2003). Geographical Genetics. Princeton University Press: Princeton and Oxford.
37. Epperson BK, Li T (1996). Measurement of genetic structure within populations using Moran's spatial autocorrelation statistics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 10528-10532.
38. Epps CW, Palsbøll PJ, Wehausen JD, Roderick GK, Ramey II RR, McCullough DR (2005). Highways block gene flow and cause a rapid decline in genetic diversity of desert bighorn sheep. Ecol Lett 8: 1029-1038.
39. Ezard THG, Travis JMJ (2006). The impact of habitat loss and fragmentation on genetic drift and fixation time. Oikos 114: 367-375.
40. Forman RTT (1997). Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions. Cambridge University Press: New York.
41. Fortin M-J, Dale M 2005. Spatial Analysis: A Guide for Ecologists. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
42. Fotheringham AS, Brunsdon C, Charlton M (2004). Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships. J Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York.
43. Francois O, Ancelet S, Guillot G (2006). Bayesian clustering using hidden markov random fields in spatial population genetics. Genetics, 3 August [E-pub ahead of print].
44. Funk WC, Blouin MS, Corn PS, Maxell BA, Pilliod DS, Amish S et al. (2005). Population structure of Columbia spotted frogs (Rana luteiventris) is strongly affected by the landscape. Mol Ecol 14: 483-496.
45. Gardner RH (2001). Scaling Relations in Experimental Ecology. Columbia University Press: New York.
46. Gardner RH, Milne BT, Turner MG, O'Neill RV (1987). Neutral models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape pattern. Landscape Ecol 1: 19-28.
47. Gee JM (2004). Gene flow across a climatic barrier between hybridizing avian species, California and Gambel's quail. Evolution 58: 1108-1121.
48. Geffen E, Anderson MJ, Wayne RK (2004). Climate and habitat bariers to dispersal in the highly mobile grey wolf. Mol Ecol 13: 2481-2490.
49. Goovaerts P (1997). Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
50. Greenberg JA, Dobrowski SZ, Ustin SL (2005). Shadow allometry: estimating tree structure parameters using hyperspatial image analysis. Remote Sens Environ 97: 15-25.
51. Griffith D, Amrhein C (1997). Multivariate Statistical Analysis for Geographers. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. 345p.
52. Guillot G, Estoup A, Mortier F, Cosson JF (2005a). A spatial statistical model for landscape genetics. Genetics 170: 1261-1280.
53. Guillot G, Mortier F, Estoup A (2005b). Geneland: a computer package for landscape genetics. Mol Ecol Notes 5: 712-715.
54. Gustafson EJ (1998). Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: what is the state of the art? Ecosystems 1: 143-156.
55. Haines-Young R, Chopping M (1996). Quantifying landscape structure: a review of landscape indices and their application to forested landscapes. Prog Phys Geogr 20: 418-445.
56. Haining R (1990). Spatial Data Analysis in the Social and Environmental Sciences. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
57. Haining R (2003). Spatial Data Analysis: Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
58. Harrison A, Dunn R (1993). Problems of sampling the landscape. In: Haines-Young R, Green DR, Cousins S (eds). Landscape Ecology and GIS. Taylor and Francis: London. pp 101-109.
59. Hirao AS, Kudo G (2004). Landscape genetics of alpine-snowbed plants: comparisons along geographic and snowmelt gradients. Heredity 93: 290-298.
60. Hitchings SP, Beebee TJC (1997). Genetic substructuring as a result of barriers to gene flow in urban Rana temporaria (common frog) populations: implications for biodiversity conservation. Heredity 79: 117-127.
61. Holderegger R, Wagner HH (2006). A brief guide to landscape genetics. Land Ecol 21: 793-796.
62. Holzhauer S, Ekschmitt K, Sander A-C, Dauber J, Wolters V (2006). Effect of historic landscape change on the genetic structure of the bush-cricket (Metrioptera roeseli). Landscape Ecol 21: 891-899.
63. Hudak AT, Crookston NL, Evans JS, Falkowski MJ, Smith AMS, Morgan P et al. (2004). Regression modeling and mapping of coniferous forest basal area and tree density from discrete-return lidar and mulitspectral satellite data. Can J Remote Sens 32: 126-138.
64. Isaaks EH, Srivastava RM (1989). An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics. Oxford University Press: New York.
65. Jacquemyn H (2004). Genetic structure of the forest herb Primula elatior in a changing landscape. Mol Ecol 13: 211-219.
66. Jongman RHG, Braak CJFT, Tongeren OFRV (eds) (1995). Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
67. Jorde PE, Ryman N (1995). Temporal allele frequency change and estimation of effective size in populations with overlapping generations. Genetics 139: 1077-1090.
68. Jørgensen HBH, Hansen MM, Bekkevold D, Ruzzante DE, Loeschcke V (2005). Marine landscapes and population genetic structure of herring (Clupea harengus L.) in the Baltic Sea. Mol Ecol 14: 3219-3234.
69. Keitt TH, Bjornstad ON, Dixson PM, Citron-Pousty S (2002). Accounting for spatial pattern when modeling organism-environment interactions. Ecography 25: 616-625.
70. Kelly M, Meentemeyer RK (2002). Landscape dynamics of the spread of sudden oak death. Photogram Eng Remote Sens 68: 1001-1009.
71. Kennington WJ, Gockel J, Partridge L (2003). Testing for asymmetrical gene flow in a Drosophila melanogaster body-size cline. Genetics 165: 667-673.
72. Keyghobadi N, Roland J, Matter SF, Strobeck C (2005a). Among- and within-patch components of genetic diversity respond at different rates to habitat fragmentation: an empirical demonstration. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 272: 553-560.
73. Keyghobadi N, Roland J, Strobeck C (2005b). Genetic differentiation and gene flow among populations of the alpine butterfly, Parnassium smintheus, vary with landscape connectivity. Mol Ecol 14: 1897-1909.
74. Keyghobadi N, Roland J, Strobeck S (1999). Influence of landscape on the population genetic structure of the alpine butterfly Parnassius smintheus (Papilionidae). Mol Ecol 8: 1481-1495.
75. King AW (1990). Translating models across scales in the landscape. Quantitative Methods of Landscape Ecology. Springer: Berlin, Allemagne. pp 479-517.
76. Kreyer D, Oed A, Ealther-Hallwig K, Frank R (2004). Are forests potential landscape barriers for foraging bumblebees? Landscape scale experiments with Bombus terrestris agg. and Bombus pascuorum (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Biol Conserv 116: 111-118.
77. Leblois R, Rousset F, Estoup A (2004). Influence of spatial and temporal heterogeneities on the estimation of demographic parameters in a continuous population using individual microsatellite data. Genetics 166: 1081-1092.
78. Lefsky MA, Cohen WB, Parker GG, Harding DJ (2002). Lidar remote sensing for ecosystem studies. BioScience 52: 19-30.
79. Legendre P (1993). Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm? Ecology 74: 1659-1673.
80. Legendre P (2002). The consequences of spatial structure for the design and analysis of ecological field surveys. Ecography 25: 601-615.
81. Legendre P, Dale MRT, Fortin M-J, Gurevitch J, Hohn M, Myers D (2002). The consequences of spatial structure for the design and analysis of ecological field surveys. Ecography 25: 601-615.
82. Li H, Wu J (2004). Use and misuse of landscape indices. Landscape Ecol 19: 155-169.
83. Liburne LR, Webb TH, Francis GS (2004). The scale matcher: a procedure for assessing scale compatibility of spatial data and models. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 18: 257-280.
84. Liepelt S, Bialozyt R, Ziegenhage B (2002). Wind-dispersed pollen mediates postglacial gene flow among refugia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 14590-14594.
85. Manel S, Berthoud F, Bellemain E, Gaudeul M, Luikart G, Swenson JE et al. (submitted). A new individual-based spatial approach for identifying genetic discontinuities in natural populations. Mol Ecol.
86. Manel S, Gaggiotti OE, Waples RS (2005). Assignment methods: matching biological questions with appropriate techniques. Trends Ecol Evol 20: 136-142.
87. Manel S, Schwartz MK, Luikart G, Taberlet P (2003). Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics. Trends Ecol Evol 18: 189-197.
88. Manni F, Guerard E, Heyer E (2004). Geographic patterns of (genetic, morphologic, linguistic) variation: how barriers can be detected by using Monmonier's algorithm. Hum Biol 76: 173-190.
89. Mantel N (1967). The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. J Cancer Res 27: 209-220.
90. Marceau DJ (1999). The scale issue in social and natural sciences. Can J Remote Sens 25: 347-356.
91. Marvier M, Van Acker RC (2005). Can crop transgenes be kept on a leash? Frontiers Ecol Environ 3: 99-106.
92. McGarigal K, Marks BJ (1995). FRAGSTATS. Spatial analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-GTR-351.
93. McRae BH, Beier P, Dewald LE, Huynh LY, Keim P (2005). Habitat barriers limit gene flow and illuminate historical events in a wide-ranging carnivore, the American puma. Mol Ecol 14: 1965-1977.
94. Michels E, Cottenie K, Neys L, DeGalas K, Coppin P, DeMeester L (2001). Geographical and genetic distances among zooplankton populations in a set of interconnected ponds: a plea for using GIS modeling of the effective geographical distance. Mol Ecol 10: 1929-1938.
95. Miller CR, Waits LP (2003). The history of effective population size and genetic diversity in the Yellowstone grizzly (Ursus arctos): implications for conservation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 4334-4339.
96. Mladenoff DJ (2004). LANDIS and forest landscape models. Ecol Model 180: 7-19.
97. Monmonier MS (1973). Maximum-difference barriers: an alternative numeritcal regionalization method. Geogr Anal 5: 245-261.
98. Moran C (1950). Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika 37: 17-23.
99. Nei M (1978). Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89: 583-590.
100. Nei M, Le WH (1973). Linkage disequilibrium in subdivided populations. Genetics 75: 213-219.
101. O'Neill RV, Krummel JR, Gardner RH, Sugihara G, Jackson B, DeAngelis DL et al. (1988). Indices of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecol 1: 153-162.
102. Paetkau D, Calvert W, Stirling I, Strobeck C (1995). Microsatellite analysis of a population structure in Canadian polar bears. Mol Ecol 3: 489-495.
103. Palo JU, Lesbarreres D, Schmeller DS, Primmer CR, Marilea J (2004). Microsatellite marker data suggest sex-biased dispersal in the common frog Rana temporaria. Mol Ecol 13: 2865-2869.
104. Peakall R, Ruibal M, Linenmayer D (2003). Spatial autocorrelation analysis offers new insights into gene flow in the Australian bush rat, Rattus fuscipes. Evolution 57: 1182-1195.
105. Pfenninger M (2002). Relationship between microspatial population genetric structure and habitat heterogeneity in Pomatias elegans (O.F. Muller 1774) (Caenogastropoda, Pomatiasidae). Biol J Linn Soc Lond 76: 565-575.
106. Piertney SB, MacColl ADC, Bacon PJ, Dallas JF (1998). Local genetic structure in red grouse (Lagopus lagopus scoticus): evidence from microsatellite DNA markers. Mol Ecol 7: 1645-1654.
107. Pilson D, Prendeville HR (2004). Ecological effects of transgenetic crops and the escape of transgenes into wild populations. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 35: 149-174.
108. Poissant J, Knight TW, Ferguson MM (2005). Nonequilibrium conditions following landscape rearrangement: the relative contribution of past and current hydrological landscapes on the genetic structure of a stream-dwelling fish. Mol Ecol 14: 1321-1331.
109. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000). Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945-959.
110. Proctor MF, McLellan BN, Barclay RMR (2005). Genetic analysis reveals demographic fragmentation of grizzly bears yielding vulnerably small populations. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 272: 240-2416.
111. Pulliam HR (1988). Sources, sinks and population regulation. Am Nat 132: 652-661.
112. Rahman AF, Cordova VD, Gamon JA (2004). Potential of MODIS ocean bands for estimating CO2 flux from terrestrial vegetation: a novel approach. Geophys Res Lett 31: Art. No. L10503.
113. Ramstad KM, Woody CA, Stage GK, Allendorf FW (2004). Founding events influence genetic population structure of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) in Lake Clark, Alaska. Mol Ecol 13: 277-290.
114. Rannala B, Mountain JL (1997). Detecting immigration by using multilocus genotypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 9197-9201.
115. Raufaste N, Rousset F (2001). Are partial mantel tests adequate? Evolution 55: 1703-1705.
116. Rehfeldt GH, Ying CC, Spittlehouse DL, Hamilton Jr DA (1999). Genetic responses to climate in Pinus Contorta: niche breadth, climate changes, and reforestation. Ecol Monogr 69: 375-407.
117. Rieger MA, Lamond M, Preston C, Powles SB, Rouch RT (2002). Pollen-mediated movement of herbicide resistance between commercial canola fields. Science 296: 2386-2388.
118. Riley SPD, Pollinger JP, Sauvajot RM, York EC, Bromley C, Fuller TK et al. (2006). A southern California freeway is a physical and social barrier to gene flow in carnivores. Mol Ecol 15: 1733-1741.
119. Roach JL, Stapp P, Horne BV, Antolin MF (2001). Genetic structure of a metapopulation of black-tailed prairie dogs. J Mammal 82: 946-959.
120. Rousset F (2002). Partial mantel tests: reply to Castellano and Balletto. Evolution 56: 1874-1875.
121. Running SW, Nemani RR, Heinsch FA (2004). A continuous satellite-derived measure of global terrestrial primary production. BioScience 54: 547-560.
122. Sacks BN, Brown SK, Ernest HB (2004). Population structure of California coyotes corresponds to habitat-specific breaks and illuminates species history. Mol Ecol 13: 1265-1275.
123. Sakai AK, Allendorf F, Holt JS, Lodge DM, Molofsky J, With KA et al. (2001). The population biology of invasive species. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32: 305-332.
124. Saura S (2002). Effects of minimum mapping unit on land cover data spatial configuration and composition. Int J Remote Sens 23: 4853-4880.
125. Saura S, Martínez-Millán J (2001). Landscape patterns simulation with a modified random clusters method. Landscape Ecol 15: 661-678.
126. Scribner KT, Blanchong JA, Bruggeman DJ, Epperson BK, Lee C-Y, Pan Y-W et al. (2005). Geographical genetics: conceptual foundations and empirical applications of spatial genetic data in wildlife management. J Wildlife Manage 69: 1434-1453.
127. Sezen UU, Chazdon RL, Holsinger KE (2005). The palm trees in a second growth forest in Costa Rica are much less genetically diverse than trees in the adjacent old growth. Science 307: 891.
128. Shimatani K (2002). Point process for fine-scale spatial genetics and molecular ecology. Biom J 44: 325-352.
129. Shimatani K, Takahashi M (2003). On methods of spatial analysis for genotyped individuals. Heredity 91: 173-180.
130. Singleton PH, Gaines WL, Lehmkuhl JF (2002). Landscape permeability for large carnivores in Washington: a geographic information system weighted-distance and least-cost corridor assessment. U.S. Forest Service Research Paper PNW-RP-549.
131. Smouse PE, Long JC, Sokal RR (1986). Multiple regression and correlation extensions of the Mantel test of matrix correspondence. Syst Zool 35: 627-632.
132. Spear SF, Peterson CR, Matacq M, Storfer A (2005). Landscape genetics of the blotched tiger salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum melanostictum). Mol Ecol 14: 2553-2564.
133. Taaffe EJ, Gauthier HL, O'Kelly ME (1996). Geography of transportation, 2nd edn, Simon and Schuster: Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
134. ter Braak CJF, Verdonschot PFM (1995). Cononical correspondence analysis and related multivariate methods in aquatic ecology. Aquat Sci 5/4: 1-35.
135. ter Braak CJF (1995). Canonical correspondence analysis and related multivariate methods in aquatic ecology. Aquat Sci 55: 255-289.
136. Thompson SK, Seber GAF (1996). Adaptive Sampling. Wiley: New York.
137. Trapnell DW, Hamrick JL (2004). Partitioning nuclear and chloroplast variation at multiple spatial scale in the neotropical epiphytic orchid, Laulia rubescens. Mol Ecol 13: 2655-25666.
138. Turner M (2005). Landscape ecology: what is the state of the science. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 36: 319-344.
139. Turner MG, Gardner RH, O'Neill RV (eds) (2001). Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice: Pattern and Process. Springer: New York.
140. Vignieri SN (2005). Streams over mountains: influence of riparian connectivity on gene flow in the Pacific jumping mouse (Zapus trinotatus). Mol Ecol 14: 1925-1937.
141. Wagner H, Holderegger R, Werth S, Gugerli F, Hoebee SE, Scheidegger C (2005). Variogram analysis of the spatial genetic structure of continuous populations using multilocus microsatellite data. Genetics 169: 1739-1752.
142. Walker RS, Novaro AJ, Branch LC (2003). Effects of patch attributes, barriers, and distance between patches on the distribution of a rock-dwelling rodent (Lagidium viscacia). Landscape Ecol 18: 187-194.
143. Waples RS (1998). Separating the wheat from the chaff: patterns of genetic differentiation in high gene flow species. J Hered 81: 267-276.
144. Whitlock MC (1992). Temporal fluctuations in demographic parameters and the genetic variance among populations. Evolution 46: 608-615.
145. Wilson GA, Rannala B (2003). Bayesian inference of recent migration rates using multilocus genotypes. Genetics 163: 1177-1191.
146. Wu J (2004). Effects of changing scale on landscape pattern analysis: scaling relations. Landscape Ecol 19: 125-138.
147. Wulder MA, Hall RJ, Coops NC, Franklin SE (2004). High spatial resolution remotely sensed data for ecosystem characterization. BioScience 54: 511-521.