Methods in comparative phylogeography, and their application to studying evolution in the North American aridlands

Integrative and Comparative Biology

Volumn 42, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 953-959

  Zink, Robert M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AVES; CELLULAR ORGANISMS; MAMMALIA;

EID: 0036876576     PISSN: 00031569     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icb/42.5.953     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Arbogast, B. S. and G. J. Kenagy. 2001. Comparative phylogeography as an integrative approach to historical biogeography. J. Biogeography 28:819-825.
2. Avise, J. C. 1992. Molecular population structure and the biogeographic history of a regional fauna: A case history with lessons for conservation biology. Oikos 63:62-76.
3. Avise, J. C., J. Arnold, R. M. Ball, E. Bermingham, T. Lamb, J. E. Neigel, C. A. Reeb, and N. C. Saunders. 1987. Intraspecific phylogeography: The mitochondrial DNA bridge between population genetics and systematics. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18:489-522.
4. Bermingham, E. and J. C. Avise. 1986. Molecular zoogeography of freshwater fishes in the southeastern United States. Genetics 113:939-965.
5. Brown, J. H. 1995. Macroecology. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago.
6. Clement, M., D. Posada, and K. A. Crandall. 2000. TCS: A computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol. Ecol. 9:1657-1660.
7. Cracraft, J. 1988. Deep-history biogeography: Retrieving the historical pattern of evolving continental biotas. Syst. Zool. 37:221-236.
8. Crandall, K. A. and A. R. Templeton. 1996. Applications of intraspecific phylogenetics. In P. H. Harvey, A. J. L. Brown, J. M. Smith, and S. Nee (eds.). New uses for new phylogenies, pp. 81-99. Oxford Univ Press, New York.
9. Fu, Y.-X. 1997. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking and background selection. Genetics 147:915-925.
10. Grismer, L. L. 2002. A re-evaluation of the evidence for a Mid-Pleistocene Mid-Peninsular seaway in Baja California: A reply to Riddle et al. Herpetological Review 33:15-16.
11. Harpending, H. C., M. A. Batzer, M. Gurvey, L. B. Jorde, A. R. Rogers, and S. T. Sherry. 1998. Genetic traces of ancient demography. PNAS 95:1961-1967.
12. Hewitt, G. M. 2000. The genetic legacy of the Quaternary ice ages. Nature 405:907-913.
13. Klicka, J. and R. M. Zink. 1999. Pleistocene effects on North American songbird evolution. Proc. R. Soc. London B 266:695-700.
14. Kuchta, S. R. and D. Meyer. 2001. A genealogical view of geographical variation. Mol. Ecol. 10:2569-2576.
15. Merila, J., M. Bjorklund, and A. J. Baker. 1997. Historical demography and present day population structure of the greenfinch, Carduelis chloris - an analysis of mtDNA control region sequences. Evolution 51:946-56.
16. Moritz, C. 1996. Uses of molecular phylogenies for conservation. In P. H. Harvey, A. J. L. Brown, J. M. Smith, and S. Nee (eds.), New uses for new phylogenies, pp. 203-214. Oxford Univ Press, New York.
17. Posada, D. and K. A. Crandall. 2001. Intraspecific gene genealogies: Tres grafting into networks. Trends Ecology and Evolution 16:37-45.
18. Riddle, B. R., D. J. Hafner, L. F. Alexander, and J. R. Jaeger. 2000a. Cryptic vicariance in the historical assembly of a Baja California peninsular desert biota. PNAS USA 97:14438-14443.
19. Riddle, B. R., D. J. Hafner, and L. F. Alexander. 2000b. Comparative phylogeography of Baileys' Pocket Mouse (Chaetodipus baileyi) and the Peromyscus eremicus species group: Historical vicariance of the Baja California peninsular desert. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 17:161-172.
20. Riddle, B. R., D. J. Hafner, and L. F. Alexander. 2000c. Phylogeography and systematics of the Peromyscus eremicus species group and the historical biogeography of North American warm regional deserts. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 17:145-160.
21. Schneider, S., D. Roessli, and L. Excoffier. 2000. Arlequin ver. 2.00. A software for population genetics data analysis, http://anthro.unige.ch/arlequin
22. Taberlet, P., L. Fumagalli, A.-G. Wust-Saucy, and J.-F. Cosson. 1998. Comparative phylogeography and postglacial colonization routes in Europe. Mole. Ecol. 7:453-464.
23. Templeton, A. R. 1998. Nested clade analyses of phylogeographic data: testing hypotheses about gene flow and population history. Mole. Ecol. 7:381-397.
24. Zink, R. M. 1996. Comparative phylogeography of North American birds. Evolution 50:308-317.
25. Zink, R. M. 1997. Phylogeographic studies of North American birds. In D. P. Mindell (ed.), Avian molecular evolution and systematics, pp. 297-320. Academic Press.
26. Zink, R. M., D. Anderson, and D. Lott. 1987. Genetic variation, population structure and evolution of California Quail. Condor 89:395-405.
27. Zink, R. M., G. F. Barrowclough, R. C. Blackwell-Rago, and J. L. Atwood. 2000. Conservation genetics of the California Gnatcatcher. Conservation Biology 14:1394-1405.
28. Zink, R. M., D. L. Dittmann, J. Klicka, and R. C. Blackwell. 1999. Evolutionary patterns of morphometrics, allozymes and mitochondrial DNA in thrashers (Genus Toxostoma). Auk 116:1021-1038.
29. Zink, R. M., A. E. Kessen, T. V. Line, and R. C. Blackwell-Rago. 2001. Comparative phylogeography of some aridland bird species. Condor 103:1-10.