Special issue on gene conservation: Identification and management of genetic diversity

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 8, Issue 12 SUPPL., 1999, Pages

  King, Tim L ^a   Burke, Terry ^b  

^a LEETOWN SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENETIC CONSERVATION; GENETIC DIVERSITY;

ANIMALS; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOLOGY; ECOSYSTEM; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; UNITED STATES; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 0033369426     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00893.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Amato G, Gatesy J, Brazaitis P (1998) PCR assays of variable nucleotide sites for identification of conservation units: Examples from Caiman. In: Molecular Evolution: Approaches and Applications, 2nd edn (eds DeSalle R, Schierwater B), pp. 177-189. Birkhäuser, Basel, Switzerland.
2. Avise JC (1994) Molecular Markers, Natural History, and Evolution. Chapman & Hall, London, UK.
3. Hillis DM, Moritz M, Mable BK (1996) Molecular Systematics. 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
4. Kocher TD, Stepien CA (1997) Molecular Systematics of Fishes. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
5. Mayden RL, Wood RM (1995) Systematics, species concepts, and the evolutionary significant unit in biodiversity and conservation biology. In: Evolution and the Aquatic Ecosystem: Defining Unique Units in Population Conservation (ed. Nielsen JL), American Fisheries Society Symposium 17, pp. 58-113. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD.
6. Moritz C (1994) Defining 'Evolutionary Significant Units' for conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 9, 373-375.
7. Moritz C, Lavery S, Slade R (1995) Using allele frequency and phylogeny to define units for conservation and management. In: Evolution and the Aquatic Ecosystem: Defining Unique Units in Population Conservation (ed. Nielsen JL), American Fisheries Society Symposium 17, pp. 249-262. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD.
8. Pennock DS, Dimmick WW (1997) Critique of the evolutionarily significant unit as a definition for 'distinct population segments' under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Conservation Biology, 11, 611-619.
9. Ryder OA (1986) Species conservation and systematics: the dilemma of subspecies. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 1, 9-10.
10. Vogler AP, DeSalle R (1994) Diagnosing units of conservation management. Conservation Biology, 8, 354-363.
11. Waples RS (1991) Pacific salmon, Oncorhynchus spp. & the definition of 'species' under the Endangered Species Act. Marine Fisheries Review, 53, 11-22.
12. Waples RS (1995) Evolutionarily significant units and the conservation of biological diversity under the Endangered Species Act. In: Evolution and the Aquatic Ecosystem: Defining Unique Units in Population Conservation (ed. Nielsen JL), American Fisheries Society Symposium 17, pp. 8-27. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD.
13. Waples RS (1998) Evolutionarily significant units, distinct population segments, and the Endangered Species Act: reply to Pennock and Dimmick. Conservation Biology, 12, 718-721.
14. Wayne RK (1992) On the use of morphologic and molecular genetic characters to investigate species status. Conservation Biology, 6, 590-592.