Attitude estimation of a biologically inspired robotic housefly via multimodal sensor fusion

Advanced Robotics

Volumn 23, Issue 7-8, 2009, Pages 955-977

  Campolo, Domenico ^a   Schenato, Luca ^b   Pi, Lijuan ^c   Deng, Xinyan ^c   Guglielmelli, Eugenio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY CAMPUS BIO MEDICO   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

Biologically inspired robots; Dynamic attitude estimation; Sensor fusion

Indexed keywords

AERIAL VEHICLE; ATTITUDE ESTIMATION; BIOINSPIRED SENSORS; BIOLOGICALLY INSPIRED ROBOTS; BIOLOGICALLY-INSPIRED ROBOTICS; COMPLEMENTARY FILTERS; DYNAMIC OBSERVERS; FILTER PERFORMANCE; GEOMETRIC APPROACHES; GLOBAL ASYMPTOTIC STABILITY; KINEMATIC DATA; LIE GROUP; MAGNETIC COMPASS; MICRO-MECHANICAL; MULTIMODAL SENSOR FUSION; MULTIPLE SENSOR FUSION; RIGID BODY ROTATION; ROBOTIC FLAPPER; SENSOR FUSION;

ASYMPTOTIC STABILITY; COMPASSES (MAGNETIC); ESTIMATION; KINEMATICS; ROBOTICS; ROBOTS;

SENSORS;

EID: 67650228316     PISSN: 01691864     EISSN: 15685535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/156855309X443052     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. J. P. How, E. King and Y. Kuwata, Flight demonstrations of cooperative control for UAV teams, in: Proc. AIAA 3rd Unmanned Unlimited Technical Conf., Chicago, IL, pp. 1509-1516 (2004).
2. H. J. Kim, D. H. Shim and S. Sastry, A flight control system for aerial robots: algorithms and experiments, Control Eng. Pract. 11, 1389-1400 (2003).
3. J. Grasmeyer and M. T. Keennon, Development of the black widow micro air vehicle, in: Proc. 39th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, AIAA-2001-0127 (2001).
4. I. Kroo and P. Kunz, Development of the mesicopter: a miniature autonomous rotorcraft, in: Proc. American Helicopter Society Vertical Lift Aircraft Design Conf., San Francisco, CA (2000).
5. R. S. Fearing, K. H. Chiang, M. H. Dickinson, D. L. Pick, M. Sitti and J. Yan, Wing transmission for a micromechanical flying insect, in: Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, San Francisco, CA, pp. 1509-1516 (2000).
6. R. C. Michelson and M. A. Naqvi, Beyond biologically inspired insect flight, in: Proc. von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics RTO/AVT Lecture Series on Low Reynolds Number Aerodynamics on Aircraft Including Applications in Emergening UAV Technology, Brussels, pp. 1-19 (2003).
7. S. P. Sane and M. H. Dickinson, The control of flight force by a flapping wing: lift and drag production, J. Exp. Biol. 204, 2607-2626 (2001).
8. S. P. Sane, The aerodynamics of insect flight, J. Exp. Biol. 206, 4191-4208 (2003).
9. G. K. Taylor, Mechanics and aerodynamics of insect flight control, Biol. Rev. 76, 449-471 (2001).
10. X. Deng, L. Schenato and S. S. Sastry, Flapping flight for biomimetic robotic insects. Part II: flight control design, IEEE Trans. Robotics 22, 789-803 (2006).
11. L. Schenato, W. C. Wu and S. S. Sastry, Attitude control for a micromechanical flying insect via sensor output feedback, IEEE Trans. Robotics Automat. 20, 93-106 (2004).
12. J. Wessnitzer and B. Webb, Multimodal sensory integration in insects: towards insect brain control architectures, Bioinspirat. Biomimet. 1, 63-75 (2006).
13. M. Epstein, S. Waydo, S. B. Fuller, W. Dickson, A. Straw, M. H. Dickinson and R. M. Murray, Biologically inspired feedback design for drosophila flight, in: Proc. IEEE American Control Conf., New York, NY, pp. 3395-3401 (2007).
14. G. J. Leishman, Principles of Helicopter Aerodynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000).
15. W. T. Higgins, A comparison of complementary and Kalman filtering, IEEE Trans. Aerospace Electon. Syst. 11, 321-325 (1975).
16. R. G. Brown and P. Y. C. Hwang, Introduction to Random Signals and Applied Kalman Filtering. Wiley, New York, NY (1992).
17. D. H. S. Maithripala, J. M. Berg and W. P. Dayawansa, Almost-global tracking of simple mechanical systems on a general class of Lie groups, IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 51, 216-225 (2006).
18. D. E. Koditschek, The application of total energy as a Lyapunov function for mechanical control systems, Dyn. Control Multibody Syst. 97, 131-157 (1989).
19. F. Bullo and R. M. Murray, Tracking for fully actuated mechanical systems: a geometric framework, Automatica 35, 17-34 (1999).
20. D. H. S. Maithripala, J. M. Berg and W. P. Dayawansa, An intrinsic observer for a class of simple mechanical systems on a Lie group, SIAM J. Control Optim. 44, 1691-1711 (2005).
21. J. Chahl, Bioinspired engineering of exploration systems: a horizon sensor/attitude reference system based on the dragonfly ocelli for Mars exploration applications, J. Robotic Syst. 20, 35-42 (2003).
22. X. Deng, L. Schenato, W. C. Wu and S. S. Sastry, Flapping flight for biomimetic robotic insects. Part I: system modeling, IEEE Trans. Robotics 22, 789-803 (2006).
23. R. Hengstenberg, Mechanosensory control of compensatory head roll during flight in the blowfly Calliphora erythrocephala, J. Comp. Physiol. A 163, 151-165 (1988).
24. G. Nalbach, The halteres of the blowfly Calliphora: I. Kinematics and dynamics, J. Comp. Phys-iol. A 173, 293-300 (1993).
25. W. C. Wu, R. J. Wood and R. F. Fearing, Halteres for the micromechanical flying insect, in: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Washington, DC, pp. 60-65 (2002).
26. M. H. Dickinson, Linear and nonlinear encoding properties of an identified mechanoreceptor on the fly wing measured with mechanical noise stimuli, J. Exp. Biol. 151, 219-244 (1990).
27. S. P. Sane, A. Dieudonne, M. A. Willis and T. L. Daniel, Antennal mechanosensors mediate flight control in moths, Science 315, 863-866 (2007).
28. H. Schuppe and R. Hengstenberg, Optical properties of the ocelli of Calliphora erythrocephala and their role in the dorsal light response, J. Comp. Biol. A 173, 143-149 (1993).
29. W. Reichardt and M. Egelhaaf, Properties of individual movement detectors as derived from behavioural experiments on the visual system of the fly, Biol. Cybernet 58, 287-294 (1988).
30. D. Lambrinos, H. Kobayashi, R. Pfeifer, M. Maris, T. Labhart and R. Wehner, An autonomous agent navigating with a polarized light compass, Adaptive Behavior 6, 131-161 (1997).
31. E. Wajnberga, G. Cernicchiaroa, D. Acosta-Avalosb, L. J. El-Jaicka and D. M. S. Esquivel, Induced remanent magnetization of social insects, J. Magnet. Magnet. Mater. 226-230, 2040-2041 (2001).
32. W. C. Wu, L. Schenato, R. J. Wood and R. F. Fearing, Biomimetic sensor suite for flight control of MFI: design and experimental results, in: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Taipei, pp. 1146-1151 (2003).
33. F. Daum, Nonlinear filters: beyond the Kalman filter, IEEE A&E Syst. Mag. 20, 57-69 (2005).
34. F. Bullo and R. F. Murray, Proportional derivative (PD) control on the Euclidean group, Technical Report, California Institute of Technology, Anaheim, CA (1995).
35. D. Campolo, F. Keller and E. Guglielmelli, Inertial/magnetic sensors based orientation tracking on the group of rigid body rotations with application to wearable devices, in: Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Beijing, pp. 4262-4267 (2006).
36. T. Hamel and R. Mahony, Attitude estimation on SO (3) based on direct inertial measurements, in: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Orlando, FL, pp. 2170-2175 (2006).
37. V. I. Arnold, Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, NY (1989).
38. T. Frankel, The Geometry of Physics: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997).
39. R. M. Murray, Z. Li and S. S. Sastry, A Mathematical Introduction to Robotic Manipulation. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (1994).
40. S. S. Sastry, Nonlinear Systems: Analysis, Stability and Control. Springer, New York, NY (1999).
41. F. Bullo and A. D. Lewis, Geometric Control of Mechanical Systems. Springer, New York, NY (2005).
42. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation. Available at: http://www.csiro.au
43. Victoria Museum. Available at: http://www.museum.vic.gov.au