Antennal mechanosensors mediate flight control in moths

Science

Volumn 315, Issue 5813, 2007, Pages 863-866

  Sane, Sanjay P ^a   Dieudonné, Alexandre ^a   Willis, Mark A ^b   Daniel, Thomas L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTENNA; BIOPHYSICS; CORIOLIS FORCE; FLIGHT ACTIVITY; MECHANORECEPTION; MOTH; VIBRATION;

ANTENNA; ARTICLE; CORIOLIS PHENOMENON; FLIGHT; FORELIMB; MECHANICAL STIMULATION; MOTH; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSOR; VIBRATION;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; BIOPHYSICS; FLIGHT, ANIMAL; MALE; MANDUCA; MATHEMATICS; MOVEMENT; ROTATION; SENSE ORGANS; VIBRATION; WING;

HEXAPODA; LEPIDOPTERA; PTERYGOTA (WINGED INSECTS); SPHINGIDAE; SPHINGOIDEA;

EID: 33846990855     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1133598     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. T. S. Collett, M. F. Land, J. Comp. Physiol. 99, 1 (1975).
2. H. Wagner, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B Biol. Sci. 312, 553 (1986).
3. R. M. Olberg, J. Comp. Physiol. 141, 327 (1981).
4. E. J. Warrant, Vision Res. 39, 1611 (1999).
5. J. Pringle, Philos. Trons. R. Soc. London B Biol. Sci. 233, 347 (1948).
6. G. Nalbach, R. Hengstenberg, J. Comp. Physiol. 175, 695 (1994).
7. W. P. Chan, F. Prete, M. H. Dickinson, Science 280, 289 (1998).
8. M. H. Dickinson, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B Biol. Sci. 354, 903 (1999).
9. G. Nalbach, J. Comp. Physiol. 173, 293 (1993).
10. W. Pix, G. Nalbach, J. Zeil, Naturwissenschaften 80, 371 (1993).
11. V. B. Wigglesworth, Nature 157, 655 (1946).
12. D. Schneider, Annu. Rev. Entomol. 9, 103 (1964).
13. D. Schneider, K. E. Kaissling, Zool. Johrb. Abt. Anot. Ontog. Tiere 75, 287 (1956).
14. M. Niehaus, M. Gewecke, Zoomorphologie 91, 19 (1978).
15. L. H. Field, T. Matheson, Adv. Insect Physiol. 27, 86 (1998).
16. D. Robert, M. C. Gopfert, J. Insect Physiol. 48, 189 (2002).
17. M. Gewecke, in Experimental Analysis of Insect Behaviour, L. B. Browne, Ed. (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New Vork, 1974), pp. 100-113.
18. M. Gewecke, Nature 225, 1263 (1970).
19. H. G. Heinzel, M. Gewecke, J. Comp. Physiol. 161, 671 (1987).
20. M. Gewecke, H. G. Heinzel, J. Comp, Physiol. 139, 357 (1980).
21. M. Niehaus, J. Comp. Physiol. 145, 257 (1981).
22. M. Gewecke, M. Niehaus, J. Comp. Physiol. 145, 249 (1981).
23. Materials and methods are available as supporting material on Science Online.
24. S. P. Sane, N. P. Jacobson, J. Exp. Biol. 209, 43 (2006).
25. P. Dayan, L. F. Abbott, Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2005).
26. P. Kloppenburg, S. M. Camazine, X. J. Sun, P. Randolph, J. G. Hildebrand, Cell Tissue Res. 287, 425 (1997).
27. J. S. Vande Berg, J. Morphol. 133, 439 (1971).
28. We gratefully acknowledge M. Tu for sharing high-speed videos of hovering moths; T. Hedrick for help with digitization; A. Hinterwirth and A. Mountcastle for assistance with behavior experiments; Som and Suma Chilukuri for their support; and an anonymous referee for useful feedback. Support was provided by an NSF Inter-Disciplinary Informatics Grant (S.P.S.) and the Office of Naval Research (T.L.D. and M.A.W.).