Microleakage of different cementation techniques in Class V ceramic inlays

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

Volumn 31, Issue 12, 2004, Pages 1192-1196

  Ozturk, A N ^a   Ozturk, B ^a   Aykent, F ^a  

^a SELCUK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Cementation; Ceramic inlay; Dentine bonding agent; Microleakage

Indexed keywords

DENTIN BONDING AGENT;

ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CERAMIC PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVALUATION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; KRUSKAL WALLIS TEST; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RANK SUM TEST; WILCOXON SIGNED RANKS TEST;

BICUSPID; CEMENTATION; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL ETCHING; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMANS; INLAYS;

EID: 9744265030     PISSN: 0305182X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01361.x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Gordan VV, Vargas MA, Cobb DS, Denehy GE. Evaluation of acidic primers in microleakage of class 5 composite resin restorations. Oper Dent. 1998;5:244-249.
2. Pilo R, Ben-Amar A. Comparison of microleakage for three one-bottle and three multiple-step dentin bonding agents. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;82:209-213.
3. Hahn P, Attin T, Gröfke M, Hellwig E. Influence of resin cement viscosity on microleakage of ceramic inlays. Dent Mater. 2001;17:191-196.
4. Reid JS, Saunders WP, Chen YY. The effect of bonding agent and fissure sealent on microleakage of composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int. 1991;22:295-298.
5. Magne P, Douglas WH. Porcelain veneers: dentin bonding optimization and biomimetic recovery of the crown. Int J Prosthodont. 1999;12:111-121.
6. Paul SJ, Scharer P. The dual bonding technique: a modified method to improve adhesive luting procedures. Int J Periodont Restor Dent. 1997;17:537-545.
7. Oztürk AN, Aykent F. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89:275-282.
8. Meiers JC, Kazemi R, Meier CD. Microleakage of packable composite resins. Oper Dent. 2001;26:121-126.
9. Crim GA. Influence of bonding agents and composites on microleakage. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;61:571-574.
10. Dejou J, Sindres V, Camps J. Influence of criteria on the results of in vitro evaluation of microleakage. Dent Mater. 1996;12:342-349.
11. Swift EJ, Perdigao J, Heymann HO. Bonding to enamel and dentin: a brief history and state of the art. Quintessence Int. 1995;26:95-110.
12. Fitchie JG, Reeves GW, Scarbrough AR, Hembree JH. Microleakage of two new dentinal bonding systems. Quintessence Int. 1990;21:749-752.
13. Hickel R, Dasch W, Janda R, Tyas M, Anusavice K. New direct restorative material. Int Dent J. 1998;48:3-16.
14. Carvalho RM, Pereira JC, Yoshiyama M, Pashley DH. A review of polymerization contraction: the influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent. 1996;21:17-24.
15. Robinson PB, Moore BK, Swartz ML. The effect on microleakage of interchanging dentine adhesives in two composite resin systems in vitro. Braz Dent J. 1988;164:77-79.
16. Yap A, Stokes AN, Pearson GJ. An in vitro microleakage study of a new multi-purpose dental adhesive system. J Oral Rehabil. 1996;23:302-308.
17. Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Vichi A, Davidson CL. Effect of two etching times on the sealing ability Clerfil Liner Bond 2 in class V restorations. Am J Dent. 1997;10:66-70.