Accumulation of sumoylated Rad52 in checkpoint mutants perturbed in DNA replication

DNA Repair

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 690-696

  Ohuchi, Takashi ^a   Seki, Masayuki ^a   Kugou, Kazuto ^b,c   Tada, Shusuke ^a   Ohta, Kunihiro ^b,c   Enomoto, Takemi ^a  

^a TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b RIKEN   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Checkpoint; Homologous recombination; Rad52; Rad53; Sumoylation

Indexed keywords

CHECKPOINT KINASE 2; HYDROXYUREA; NOCODAZOLE; RAD51 PROTEIN; RAD52 PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPLICATION; IMMUNOBLOTTING; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; SUMOYLATION;

CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; DNA REPLICATION; DNA, BACTERIAL; DNA, FUNGAL; FLOW CYTOMETRY; IMMUNOBLOTTING; MUTATION; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; RAD51 RECOMBINASE; RAD52 DNA REPAIR AND RECOMBINATION PROTEIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SMALL UBIQUITIN-RELATED MODIFIER PROTEINS;

EID: 67349271554     PISSN: 15687864     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.01.018     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Elledge S.J. Cell cycle checkpoints: preventing an identity crisis. Science 274 (1996) 1664-1672
2. Weinert T. DNA damage checkpoints update: getting molecular. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 8 (1998) 185-193
3. Zhou B.B., and Elledge S.J. The DNA damage response: putting checkpoints in perspective. Nature 408 (2000) 433-439
4. Nyberg K.A., Michelson R.J., Putnam C.W., and Weinert T.A. Toward maintaining the genome: DNA damage and replication checkpoints. Annu. Rev. Genet. 36 (2002) 617-656
5. Branzei D., and Foiani M. The DNA damage response during DNA replication. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 17 (2005) 568-575
6. Lopes M., Cotta-Ramusino C., Pellicioli A., Liberi G., Plevani P., Muzi-Falconi M., Newlon C.S., and Foiani M. The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks. Nature 412 (2001) 557-561
7. Tercero J.A., and Diffley J.F. Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint. Nature 412 (2001) 553-557
8. Desany B.A., Alcasabas A.A., Bachant J.B., and Elledge S.J. Recovery from DNA replicational stress is the essential function of the S-phase checkpoint pathway. Genes Dev. 12 (1998) 2956-2970
9. Tercero J.A., Longhese M.P., and Diffley J.F. A central role for DNA replication forks in checkpoint activation and response. Mol. Cell 11 (2003) 1323-1336
10. Santocanale C., and Diffley J.F. A Mec1- and Rad53-dependent checkpoint controls late-firing origins of DNA replication. Nature 395 (1998) 615-618
11. Shirahige K., Hori Y., Shiraishi K., Yamashita M., Takahashi K., Obuse C., Tsurimoto T., and Yoshikawa H. Regulation of DNA-replication origins during cell-cycle progression. Nature 395 (1998) 618-621
12. Santocanale C., Sharma K., and Diffley J.F. Activation of dormant origins of DNA replication in budding yeast. Genes Dev. 13 (1999) 2360-2364
13. Pan X., Ye P., Yuan D.S., Wang X., Bader J.S., and Boeke J.D. A DNA integrity network in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 124 (2006) 1069-1081
14. Lisby M., Barlow J.H., Burgess R.C., and Rothstein R. Choreography of the DNA damage response: spatiotemporal relationships among checkpoint and repair proteins. Cell 118 (2004) 699-713
15. Johnson E.S. Protein modification by SUMO. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 73 (2004) 355-382
16. Geiss-Friedlander R., and Melchior F. Concepts in sumoylation: a decade on. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8 (2007) 947-956
17. Sacher M., Pfander B., Hoege C., and Jentsch S. Control of Rad52 recombination activity by double-strand break-induced SUMO modification. Nat. Cell Biol. 8 (2006) 1284-1290
18. Torres-Rosell J., Sunjevaric I., De Piccoli G., Sacher M., Eckert-Boulet N., Reid R., Jentsch S., Rothstein R., Aragón L., and Lisby M. The Smc5-Smc6 complex and SUMO modification of Rad52 regulates recombinational repair at the ribosomal gene locus. Nat. Cell Biol. 9 (2007) 923-931
19. Ohuchi T., Seki M., Branzei D., Maeda D., Ui A., Ogiwara H., Tada S., and Enomoto T. Rad52 sumoylation and its involvement in the efficient induction of homologous recombination. DNA Repair 7 (2008) 879-889
20. Ohuchi T., Seki M., and Enomoto T. Nuclear localization of Rad52 is pre-requisite for its sumoylation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 372 (2008) 126-130
21. Katou Y., Kanoh Y., Bando M., Noguchi H., Tanaka H., Ashikari T., Sugimoto K., and Shirahige K. S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex. Nature 424 (2003) 1078-1083
22. Lengronne A., Katou Y., Mori S., Yokobayashi S., Kelly G.P., Itoh T., Watanabe Y., Shirahige K., and Uhlmann F. Cohesin relocation from sites of chromosomal loading to places of convergent transcription. Nature 430 (2004) 573-578
23. Zhao X., Muller E.G., and Rothstein R. A suppressor of two essential checkpoint genes identifies a novel protein that negatively affects dNTP pools. Mol. Cell 2 (1998) 329-340
24. Panse V.G., Hardeland U., Werner T., Kuster B., and Hurt E. A proteome-wide approach identifies sumoylated substrate proteins in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 279 (2004) 41346-41351
25. Jia-Lin Ma N., and Stern D.F. Regulation of the Rad53 protein kinase in signal amplification by oligomer assembly and disassembly. Cell Cycle 7 (2008) 808-817
26. Sørensen C.S., Hansen L.T., Dziegielewski J., Syljuåsen R.G., Lundin C., Bartek J., and Helleday T. The cell-cycle checkpoint kinase Chk1 is required for mammalian homologous recombination repair. Nat. Cell Biol. 7 (2005) 195-201
27. Bahassi E.M., Ovesen J.L., Riesenberg A.L., Bernstein W.Z., Hasty P.E., and Stambrook P.J. The checkpoint kinases Chk1 and Chk2 regulate the functional associations between hBRCA2 and Rad51 in response to DNA damage. Oncogene 27 (2008) 3977-3985
28. Davies A.A., Huttner D., Daigaku Y., Chen S., and Ulrich H.D. Activation of ubiquitin-dependent DNA damage bypass is mediated by replication protein a. Mol. Cell 29 (2008) 625-636
29. Feng W., Collingwood D., Boeck M.E., Fox L.A., Alvino G.M., Fangman W.L., Raghuraman M.K., and Brewer B.J. Genomic mapping of single-stranded DNA in hydroxyurea-challenged yeasts identifies origins of replication. Nat. Cell Biol. 8 (2006) 148-155
30. Haghnazari E., and Heyer W.D. The DNA damage checkpoint pathways exert multiple controls on the efficiency and outcome of the repair of a double-stranded DNA gap. Nucleic Acids Res. 32 (2004) 4257-4268
31. Bashkirov V.I., King J.S., Bashkirova E.V., Schmuckli-Maurer J., and Heyer W.D. DNA repair protein Rad55 is a terminal substrate of the DNA damage checkpoints. Mol. Cell Biol. 20 (2000) 4393-4404
32. Fasullo M., Dong Z., Sun M., and Zeng L. Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD53 (CHK2) but not CHK1 is required for double-strand break-initiated SCE and DNA damage-associated SCE after exposure to X rays and chemical agents. DNA Repair 4 (2005) 1240-1251
33. Boddy M.N., Lopez-Girona A., Shanahan P., Interthal H., Heyer W.D., and Russell P. Damage tolerance protein Mus81 associates with the FHA1 domain of checkpoint kinase Cds1. Mol. Cell Biol. 20 (2000) 8758-8766
34. Brush G.S., and Kelly T.J. Phosphorylation of the replication protein A large subunit in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae checkpoint response. Nucleic Acids Res. 28 (2000) 3725-3732
35. Liberi G., Chiolo I., Pellicioli A., Lopes M., Plevani P., Muzi-Falconi M., and Foiani M. Srs2 DNA helicase is involved in checkpoint response and its regulation requires a functional Mec1-dependent pathway and Cdk1 activity. EMBO J. 19 (2000) 5027-5038
36. D'Amours D., and Jackson S.P. The yeast Xrs2 complex functions in S phase checkpoint regulation. Genes Dev. 15 (2001) 2238-2249