Diversity and temporal change in the effective pollinators of asclepias tuberosa

Ecology

Volumn 77, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 1061-1073

  Fishbein, Mark ^a   Lawrence Venable, D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Arizona; Asclepias; Hymenoptera; Lepidoptera; Mutualism; Pollination effectiveness; Randomization test

Indexed keywords

POLLINATION; POLLINATOR EFFECTIVENESS;

APIDAE; APIS; ASCLEPIADACEAE; ASCLEPIAS TUBEROSA; BOMBUS; HYMENOPTERA; LEPIDOPTERA; PAPILIONIDAE;

EID: 0030411325     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2265576     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Aitkin, M., D. Anderson, B. Francis, and J. Hinde. 1989. Statistical modelling in GLIM. Oxford Statistical Science Series, 4. Clarendon Press, Oxford, England.
2. Andersson, S. 1991. Floral display and pollination success in Achillea ptarmica (Asteraceae). Holarctic Ecology 14:186-191.
3. _. 1994. Floral stability, pollination efficiency, and experimental manipulation of the corolla phenotype in Nemophila menziesii (Hydrophyllaceae). American Journal of Botany 81:1397-1402.
4. Ashman, T.-L., and M. Stanton. 1991. Seasonal variation in pollination dynamics of sexually dimorphic Sidalcea oregana ssp. spicata (Malvaceae). Ecology 72:993-1003.
5. Bailowitz, R. A., and J. P. Brock. 1991. Butterflies of southeastern Arizona. Sonoran Arthropod Studies, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
6. Bawa, K. S. 1994. Pollinators of tropical dioecious angiosperms: a reassessment? No, not yet. American Journal of Botany 81:456-460.
7. Bennington, C. C., and W. V. Thayne. 1994. Use and misuse of mixed model analysis of variance in ecological studies. Ecology 75:717-722.
8. Berlin, R. I. 1982. Floral biology, hummingbird pollination and fruit production of trumpet creeper (Campsis radicans, Bignoniaceae). American Journal of Botany 69:122-134.
9. Bierzychudek, P. 1981. Asclepias. Lantana, and Epidendrum: a floral mimicry complex? Biotropica 13:54-58.
10. Broyles, S. B., and R. Wyatt. 1990. Paternity analysis in a natural population of Asclepias exaltata: multiple paternity, functional gender, and the "pollen-donation" hypothesis. Evolution 44:1454-1468.
11. Broyles, S. B., and R. Wyatt. 1993. The consequences of self-pollination in Asclepias exaltata, a self-incompatible milkweed. American Journal of Botany 80:41-44.
12. Campbell, D. R. 1989. Inflorescence size: test of the male function hypothesis. American Journal of Botany 76:730-738.
13. Campbell, D. R., N. M. Waser, and M. V. Price. 1994. Indirect selection on stigma position in Ipomopsis aggregata via a genetically controlled trait. Evolution 48:55-68.
14. Campbell, D. R., N. M. Waser, M. V. Price, E. A. Lynch, and R. J. Mitchell. 1991. Components of phenotypic selection: pollen export and flower corolla width in Ipomopsis aggregata. Evolution 45:1458-1467.
15. Cocucci, A. 1995. Floral mechanisms in the tribe Salpiglossidae (Solanaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 194:207-230.
16. Conover, W. J. 1971. Practical nonparametric statistics. John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, USA.
17. Crawley, M. J. 1993. GLIM for ecologists. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, England.
18. de Jong, T. J., N. M. Waser, and P. G. L. Klinkhamer. 1993. Geitonogamy: the neglected side of selling. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8:307-344.
19. de Jong, T. J., N. M. Waser, M. V. Price, and R. M. Ring. 1992. Plant size, geitonogamy and seed set in Ipomopsis aggregata. Oecologia 89:321-325.
20. Eckhart, V. M. 1991. The effects of floral display on pollinator visitation vary among populations of Phacelia linearis (Hydrophyllaceae). Evolutionary Ecology 5:370-384.
21. Faegri, K., and L. van der Pijl. 1979. Principles of pollination ecology. Third edition. Pergamon, Oxford, England.
22. Frost, S. W. 1965. Insects and pollinia. Ecology 46:556-558.
23. Haber, W. A., and G. W. Frankie. 1989. A tropical hawkmoth community: Costa Rican dry forest Sphingidae. Biotropica 21:155-172.
24. Herrera, C. M. 1987. Components of pollinator "quality": comparative analysis of a diverse insect assemblage. Oikos 50: 79-90.
25. Hurlbert, S. H. 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological held experiments. Ecological Monographs 54:187-211.
26. Inouye, D. W., D. E. Gill, M. R. Dudash, and C. B. Fenster. 1994. A model and lexicon for pollen fate. American Journal of Botany 81:1517-1530.
27. Jennersten, O., and D. H. Morse. 1991. The quality of pollination by diurnal and nocturnal insects visiting common milkweed, Asclepias syriaca. American Midland Naturalist 125: 18-28.
28. Kephart, S. R. 1983. The partitioning of pollinators among three species of Asclepias. Ecology 64:120-133.
29. Liede, S. 1994. Some observations on pollination in Mexican Asclepiadaceae. Madroño 41:266-276.
30. Lynch, S. P. 1977. The floral ecology of Asclepias solanoana Woods. Madroño 24:159-177.
31. Macior, L. W. 1965. Insect adaptation and behavior in Asclepias pollination. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 92:114-126.
32. Manly, B. F. J. 1991. Randomization and Monte Carlo methods in biology. Chapman and Hall, London, England.
33. McDade, L. A., and S. Kinsman. 1980. The impact of floral parasitism in two neotropical hummingbird-pollinated plant species. Evolution 34:944-958.
34. Michener, C. D., R. J. McGinley, and B. N. Danforth. 1994. The bee genera of North and Central America. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
35. Mitchell, R. J. 1993. Adaptive significance of Ipomopsis aggregata nectar production: observation and experiment in the field. Evolution 47:25-35.
36. Morse, D. H. 1982. The turnover of milkweed pollinia on bumble bees, and implications for outcrossing. Oecologia 53:187-196.
37. _. 1986a. Inflorescence choice and time allocation by insects foraging on milkweed. Oikos 46:229-236.
38. _. 1986b. Predatory risk to insects foraging at flowers. Oikos 46:223-228.
39. Morse, D. H., and R. S. Fritz. 1983. Contributions of diurnal and nocturnal insects to the pollination of common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca L.) in a pollen-limited system. Oecologia 60:190-197.
40. Morse, D. H., and R. S. Fritz. 1989. Milkweed pollinia and predation risk to flower-visiting insects by the crab spider Misumena vatia. American Midland Naturalist 121:188-193.
41. Motten, A. F., D. R. Campbell, D. E. Alexander, and H. L. Miller. 1981. Pollination effectiveness of specialist and generalist visitors to a North Carolina population of Claytonia virginica. Ecology 62:1278-1287.
42. Murcia, C. 1990. Effect of floral morphology and temperature on pollen receipt and removal in Ipomoea trichocarpa. Ecology 71:1098-1109.
43. Petanidou, T., W. N. Ellis, N. S. Margaris, and D. Vokou. 1995. Constraints on flowering phenology in a phryganic (East Mediterranean shrub) community. American Journal of Botany 82: 607-620.
44. Pettersson, M. W. 1991. Pollination by a guild of fluctuating moth populations: option for unspecialization in Silene vulgaris. Journal of Ecology 79:591-604.
45. Potvin, C., and D. A. Roff. 1993. Distribution-free and robust statistical methods: viable alternatives to parametric statistics? Ecology 74:1617-1628.
46. Primack, R. B., and J. A. Silander, Jr. 1975. Measuring the relative importance of different pollinators to plants. Nature 255:143-144.
47. Proctor, M., and P. Yeo. 1972. Pollination of flowers. Taplinger, New York, New York, USA.
48. Ralph, C. P. 1976. Natural food requirements of the large milkweed bug, Oncopeltus fasciatus (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae), and their relation to gregariousness and host plant morphology. Oecologia 26:157-175.
49. _. 1977. Effect of host plant density on populations of a specialized, seed-sucking bug, Oncopeltus fasciatus. Ecology 58:799-809.
50. Robertson, C. 1886. Notes on the mode of pollination of Asclepias. Botanical Gazette 11:262-269.
51. _. 1887. Insect relations of certain asclepiads. I. Botanical Gazette 12:207-216.
52. _. 1891. Flowers and insects, Asclepiadaceae to Scrophulariaceae. Transactions of the Academy of Science of St. Louis 5:569-598.
53. _. 1928. Flowers and insects. Lists of visitors of four hundred and fifty-three flowers. Charles Robertson, Carlinville, Illinois, USA.
54. SAS Institute. 1989. SAS/STAT® user's guide, version 6. Fourth edition. Volume 2. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.
55. _. 1993. SAS/INSIGHT® user's guide, version 6. Second edition. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.
56. Schemske, D. W., and C. C. Horvitz. 1984. Variation among floral visitors in pollination ability: a precondition for mutualism specialization. Science 225:519-521.
57. Schemske, D. W., and C. C. Horvitz. 1989. Temporal variation in selection on a floral character. Evolution 43:461-465.
58. Scott, J. A. 1986. The butterflies of North America: a natural history and field guide. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, USA.
59. Shaw, R. G., and T. Mitchell-Olds. 1993. ANOVA for unbalanced data: an overview. Ecology 74:1638-1645.
60. Snow, A. A., and P. O. Lewis. 1993. Reproductive traits and male fertility in plants: empirical approaches. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24:331-351.
61. Snow, A. A., and D. W. Roubik. 1987. Pollen deposition and removal by bees visiting two tree species in Panamá. Biotropica 19:57-63.
62. Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1981. Biometry. Second edition. W. H. Freeman, New York, New York, USA.
63. Spears, E. E., Jr. 1983. A direct measure of pollinator effectiveness. Occologia 57:196-199.
64. Stanton, M. L., A. A. Snow, and S. N. Handel. 1986. Floral evolution: attractiveness to pollinators increases male fitness. Science 232:1625-1627.
65. Stanton, M. L., A. A. Snow, S. N. Handel, and J. Bereczky. 1989. The impact of a flower-color polymorphism in experimental populations of wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum L.). Evolution 43:335-346.
66. Strickler, K. 1979. Specialization and foraging efficiency of solitary bees. Ecology 60:998-1009.
67. Tepedino, V. J. 1981. The pollination efficiency of the squash bee (Peponapis pruinosa) and the honey bee (Apis mellifera) on summer squash (Cucurbita pepo). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 54:359-377.
68. Thomson, J. D., and B. A. Thomson. 1992. Pollen presentation and viability schedules in animal-pollinated plants: consequences for reproductive success. Pages1-24 in R. Wyatt, editor. Ecology and evolution of plant reproduction. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York, USA.
69. Waser, N. M., L. Chittka, M. V. Price, N. Williams, and J. Ollerton. In press. Generalization in pollination systems and why it matters. Ecology.
70. Waser, N. M., and M. V. Price. 1990. Pollination efficiency and effectiveness of bumble bees and hummingbirds visiting Delphinium nelsonii. Collectanea Botanica (Barcelona) 19:9-20.
71. Willson, M. E, and R. I. Bertin. 1979. Flower-visitors, nectar production, and inflorescence size of Asclepias syriaca. Canadian Journal of Botany 57:1380-1388.
72. Willson, M. F., R. I. Bertin, and P. W. Price. 1979. Nectar production and flower visitors of Asclepias verticillata. American Midland Naturalist 102:23-35.
73. Willson, M. F., and P. W. Price. 1977. The evolution of inflorescence size in Asclepias (Asclepiadaceae). Evolution 31: 495-511.
74. Willson, M. F., and B. J. Rathcke. 1974. Adaptive design of the floral display in Asclepias syriaca L. American Midland Naturalist 92:47-57.
75. Wilson, P., and J. D. Thomson. 1991. Heterogeneity among floral visitors leads to discordance between removal and deposition of pollen. Ecology 72:1503-1507.
76. Wolfe, L. M., and S. C. H. Barrett. 1989. Patterns of pollen removal and deposition in tristylous Pontederia cordata L. (Pontederiaceae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 36:317-329.
77. Woodson, R. E., Jr. 1954. The North American species of Asclepias L. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 41:1-211.
78. Wyatt, R. 1976. Pollination and fruit-set in Asclepias: a reappraisal. American Journal of Botany 63:845-851.
79. _. 1978. Experimental evidence concerning the role of the corpusculum in Asclepias pollination. Systematic Botany 3:313-321.
80. Wyatt, R., and S. B. Broyles. 1994. Ecology and evolution of reproduction in milkweeds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 25:423-441.
81. Wyatt, R., S. B. Broyles, and G. S. Derda. 1992. Environmental influences on nectar production in milkweeds (Asclepias syriaca and A. exaltata). American Journal of Botany 79:636-642.
82. Young, H. J. 1988. Differential importance of beetle species pollinating Dieffenbachia longispatha (Araceae). Ecology 69: 832-844.
83. Young, H. J., and M. L. Stanton. 1990. Influences of floral variation on pollen removal and seed production in wild radish. Ecology 71:536-547.