Geographic structure in a widespread plant-mycorrhizal interaction: Pines and false truffles

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 1148-1163

  Hoeksema, Jason D ^a,b   Thompson, J N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NATIONAL EVOLUTIONARY SYNTHESIS CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Coevolution; Local adaptation; Mutualism; Mycorrhizal fungi; Parasitism; Pinus; Rhizopogon

Indexed keywords

COEVOLUTION; CONIFEROUS TREE; FUNGUS; GEOGRAPHICAL VARIATION; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTION; LOCAL ADAPTATION; MUTUALISM; MYCORRHIZA;

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; BASIDIOMYCETES; EVOLUTION; GEOGRAPHY; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MICROBIOLOGY; MYCORRHIZA; PHYSIOLOGY; PINE; PLANT ROOT;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; BASIDIOMYCOTA; EVOLUTION; GEOGRAPHY; MYCORRHIZAE; PINUS; PLANT ROOTS;

NORTH AMERICA;

FUNGI; RHIZOPOGON; TUBER (TRUFFLE);

EID: 34247546519     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01287.x     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Aikio, S. & Markkola, A.M. 2002. Optimality and phenotypic plasticity of shoot-to-root ratio under variable light and nutrient availabilities. Evol. Ecol. 16: 67-76.
2. Aitken, S.N. & Libby, W.J. 1994. Evolution of the pygmy-forest edaphic subspecies of Pinus contorta across an ecological staircase. Evolution 48: 1009-1019.
3. Antunez, I., Retamosa, E.C. & Villar, R. 2001. Relative growth rate in phylogenetically related deciduous and evergreen woody species. Oecologia (Berlin) 128: 172-180.
4. Ashkannejhad, S. & Horton, T.R. 2006. Ectomycorrhizal ecology under primary succession on coastal sand dunes: interactions involving Pinus contorta, suilloid fungi and deer. New Phytol. 169: 345-354.
5. Baar, J., Horton, T.R., Kretzer, A.M. & Bruns, T.D. 1999. Mycorrhizal colonization of Pinus muricata from resistant propagules after a stand-replacing wildfire. New Phytol. 143: 409-418.
6. Benkman, C.W. 2003. Divergent selection drives the adaptive radiation of crossbills. Evolution 57: 1176-1181.
7. Bergstrom, C.T. & Lachmann, M. 2003. The Red King effect: When the slowest runner wins the coevolutionary race. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 593-598.
8. Bever, J.D. 1999. Dynamics within mutualism and the maintenance of diversity: inference from a model of interguild frequency dependence. Ecol. Lett. 2: 52-61.
9. Bloom, A.J., Chapin, F.S. & Mooney, H.A. 1985. Resource limitation in plants - an economic analogy. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16: 363-392.
10. Boehlert, G.W. & Kappenman, R.F. 1980. Variation of growth and latitude in 2 species of rockfish Sebastes pinniger and Sebastes diploproa from northeast Pacific Ocean. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 3: 1-10.
11. Brodie, E.D. Jr., Ridenhour, B.J. & Brodie, E.D. III. 2002. The evolutionary response of predators to dangerous prey: hotspots and coldspots in the geographic mosaic of coevolution between newts and snakes. Evolution 56: 2067-2082.
12. Bronstein, J.L. 1994a. Conditional outcomes in mutualistic interactions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 214-217.
13. Bronstein, J.L. 1994b. Our current understanding of mutualism. Q. Rev. Biol. 69: 31-51.
14. Burdon, R.D. 1992. Genetic survey of Pinus radiata: 9. General discussion and implications for genetic management. N. Z. J. Forestry Sci. 22: 274-298.
15. Burdon, J.J., Gibson, A.H., Searle, S.D., Woods, M.J. & Brockwell, J. 1999. Variation in the effectiveness of symbiotic associations between native rhizobia and temperate Australian Acacia: within-species interactions. J. Appl. Ecol. 36: 398-408.
16. Cassell, D.L. 2002. A randomization test wrapper for SAS PROCs (paper 251-27). In: SAS User Group International (SUGI) 27.
17. Castellano, M.A. & Molina, R. 1989. Mycorrhizae. In: The Container Tree Nursery Manual, Vol. 5, Agricultural Handbook 674 (T. D. Landis, R. W. Tinus, S. E. McDonald & J. P. Barnett, eds), pp. 101-167. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC, USA.
18. Craine, J.M., Fargione, J. & Sugita, S. 2005. Supply pre-emption, not concentration reduction, is the mechanism of competition for nutrients. New Phytol. 166: 933-940.
19. Doebeli, M. & Knowlton, N. 1998. The evolution of interspecific mutualisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 8676-8680.
20. Ebert, D. 1994. Virulence and local adaptation of a horizontally transmitted parasite. Science 265: 1084-1086.
21. Gandon, S. 1998. Local adaptation and host-parasite interactions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13: 214-216.
22. Gandon, S. & Michalakis, Y. 2002. Local adaptation, evolutionary potential and host-parasite coevolution: interactions between migration, mutation, population size and generation time. J. Evol. Biol. 15: 451-462.
23. Gandon, S. & Van Zandt, P.A. 1998. Local adaptation and host-parasite interactions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13: 214-216.
24. 2]. New Phytol. 146: 163-168.
25. Grotkopp, E., Rejmanek, M. & Rost, T.L. 2002. Toward a causal explanation of plant invasiveness: seedling growth and life-history strategies of 29 pine (Pinus) species. Am. Nat. 159: 396-419.
26. Grotkopp, E., Rejmanek, M., Sanderson, M.J. & Rost, T.L. 2004. Evolution of genome size in pines (Pinus) and its life-history correlates: supertree analyses. Evolution 58: 1705-1729.
27. Grubisha, L.C., Trappe, J.M., Molina, R. & Spatafora, J.W. 2002. Biology of the ectomycorrhizal genus Rhizopogon. VI. Re-examination of infrageneric relationships inferred from phylogenetic analyses of ITS sequences. Mycologia 94: 607-619.
28. Harper, J.L. 1977. The Population Biology of Plants. Academic Press, London.
29. Hong, Y.-P., Hipkins, V.D. & Strauss, S.H. 1993. Chloroplast DNA diversity among trees, populations and species in the California closed-cone pines (Pinus radiata, Pinus muricata and Pinus attenuata). Genetics 135: 1187-1196.
30. Horton, T.R. 2002. Molecular approaches to ectomycorrhizal diversity studies: Variation in ITS at a local scale. Plant Soil 244: 29-39.
31. Horton, T.R. & Bruns, T.D. 2001. The molecular revolution in ectomycorrhizal ecology: peeking into the black box. Mol. Ecol. 10: 1855-1871.
32. Hunt, R. 1990. Basic Growth Analysis. Unwin Hyman, London.
33. Hunt, R. & Cornelissen, J.H.C. 1997. Components of relative growth rate and their interrelations in 59 temperate plant species. New Phytol. 135: 395-417.
34. Johnson, N.C., Graham, J.H. & Smith, F.A. 1997. Functioning of mycorrhizas along the mutualism-parasitism continuum. New Phytol. 135: 1-12.
35. Jonassen, T.M., Imsland, A.K., Fitzgerald, R., Bonga, S.W., Ham, E.V., Naevdal, G., Stefansson, M.O. & Stefansson, S.O. 2000. Geographic variation in growth and food conversion efficiency of juvenile Atlantic halibut related to latitude. J. Fish Biol. 56: 279-294.
36. Jones, M.D., Durall, D.M. & Tinker, P.B. 1990. Phosphorus relationships and production of extramatricular hyphae by two types of ectomycorrhizas at different soil phosphorus levels. New Phytol. 115: 259-267.
37. Kaltz, O. & Shykoff, J.A. 1998. Local adaptation in host-parasite systems. Heredity 81: 361-370.
38. Kaltz, O., Gandon, S., Michalakis, Y. & Shykoff, J.A. 1999. Local maladaptation in the anther-smut fungus Microbotryum violaceum to its host plant Silene latifolia: evidence from a cross-inoculation experiment. Evolution 53: 395-407.
39. Kawecki, T.J. & Ebert, D. 2004. Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecol. Lett. 7: 1225-1241.
40. Klironomos, J.N. 2003. Variation in plant response to native and exotic mycorrhizal fungi. Ecology 84: 2292-2301.
41. Kretzer, A.M., Dunham, S., Molina, R. & Spatafora, J.W. 2005. Patterns of vegetative growth and gene flow in Rhizopogon vinicolor and R. vesiculosus (Boletales, Basidiomycota). Mol. Ecol. 14: 2259-2268.
42. Laine, A.L. 2005. Spatial scale of local adaptation in a plant-pathogen metapopulation. J. Evol. Biol. 18: 930-938.
43. Landis, R.M., Gurevitch, J., Fox, G.A., Fang, W. & Taub, D.R. 2005. Variation in recruitment and early demography in Pinus rigida following crown fire in the pine barrens of Long Island, New York. J. Ecol. 93: 607-617.
44. Law, R. 1985. Evolution in a mutualistic environment. In: The Biology of Mutualism (D. H. Boucher, ed.), pp. 145-170. Oxford University Press, New York.
45. Li, B., Suzuki, J.-I. & Hara, T. 1998. Latitudinal variation in plant size and relative growth rate in Arabidopsis thaliana. Oecologia 115: 293-301.
46. Lively, C.M., Dybdahl, M.F., Jokela, J., Osnas, E.E. & Delph, L.F. 2004. Host sex and local adaptation by parasites in a snail-trematode interaction. Am. Nat. 164: S6-S18.
47. Miyazawa, K. & Lechowicz, M.J. 2004. Comparative seedling ecology of eight north American spruce (Picea) species in relation to their geographic ranges. Ann. Bot. 94: 635-644.
48. Molina, R., Massicotte, H.B. & Trappe, J.M. 1992. Specificity phenomena in mycorrhizal symbioses: community-ecological consequences and practical implications. In: Mycorrhizal Functioning: An Integrative Plant-fungal Process (M. F. Allen, ed.), pp. 357-423. Chapman and Hall, New York.
49. Molina, R., Trappe, J.M., Grubisha, L.C. & Spatafora, J.W. 1999. Rhizopogon. In: Ectomycorrhizal Fungi: Key Genera in Profile (J. W. G. Cairney & S. M. Chambers, eds), pp. 129-161. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
50. Moran, G.F., Bell, J.C. & Eldridge, K.G. 1988. The genetic structure and the conservation of the five natural populations of Pinus radiata. Can. J. For. Res. 18: 506-514.
51. Murat, C., Diez, J., Luis, P., Delaruelle, C., Dupré, C., Chevalier, G., Bonfante, P. & Martin, F. 2004. Polymorphism at the ribosomal DNA ITS and its relation to postglacial re-colonization routes of the Perigord truffle Tuber melanosporum. New Phytol. 164: 401-411.
52. Nara, K. 2006. Ectomycorrhizal networks and seedling establishment during early primary succession. New Phytol. 169: 169-178.
53. Newman, E.J. 1966. A method of estimating the total root length of a root in a sample. J. Appl. Ecol. 3: 139-145.
54. Nuismer, S.L., Thompson, J.N. & Gomulkiewicz, R. 1999. Gene flow and geographically structured coevolution. Proc. R. Soc. Biol. Sci. Ser. B 266: 605-609.
55. Nuismer, S.L., Thompson, J.N. & Gomulkiewicz, R. 2000. Coevolutionary clines across selection mosaics. Evolution 54: 1102-1115.
56. Nuismer, S.L., Gomulkiewicz, R. & Morgan, M.T. 2003a. Coevolution in temporally variable environments. Am. Nat. 162: 195-204.
57. Nuismer, S.L., Thompson, J.N. & Gomulkiewicz, R. 2003b. Coevolution between species with partially overlapping geographic ranges. J. Evol. Biol. 16: 1337-1345.
58. Parker, M.A. 1999. Mutualism in metapopulations of legumes and rhizobia. Am. Nat. 153: S48-S60.
59. Pringle, A. & Taylor, J.W. 2002. The fitness of filamentous fungi. Trends. Microbiol. 10: 474-481.
60. Ryser, P. & Aeschlimann, U. 1999. Proportional dry-mass content as an underlying trait for the variation in relative growth rate among 22 Eurasian populations of Dactylis glomerata s.l. Funct. Ecol. 13: 473-482.
61. Schuster, W.S.F. & Mitton, J.B. 2000. Paternity and gene dispersal in limber pine (Pinus flexilis James). Heredity 84: 348-361.
62. Smith, S.E. & Read, D.J. 1997. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Academic Press, San Diego.
63. Sylvia, D.M., Alagely, A.K., Kane, M.E. & Philman, N.E. 2003. Compatible host/mycorrhizal fungus combinations for micropropagated sea oats. I. Field sampling and greenhouse evaluations. Mycorrhiza 13: 177-183.
64. Tagu, D., Bastien, C., Faivre-Rampant, P., Garbaye, J., Vion, P., Villar, M. & Martin, F. 2005. Genetic analysis of phenotypic variation for ectomycorrhiza formation in an interspecific F1 poplar full-sib family. Mycorrhiza 15: 87-91.
65. Taylor, D.L. & Bruns, T.D. 1999. Community structure of ectomycorrhizal fungi in a Pinus muricata forest: minimal overlap between the mature forest and resistant propagule communities. Mol. Ecol. 8: 1837-1850.
66. Thompson, J.N. 1988. Variation in interspecific interactions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19: 65-87.
67. Thompson, J.N. 1994. The Coevolutionary Process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
68. Thompson, J.N. 2005. The Geographic Mosaic of Coevolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
69. Thompson, J.N. & Cunningham, B.M. 2002. Geographic structure and dynamics of coevolutionary selection. Nature 417: 735-738.
70. Thrall, P.H., Burdon, J.J. & Woods, M.J. 2000. Variation in the effectiveness of symbiotic associations between native rhizobia and temperate Australian legumes: interactions within and between genera. J. Appl. Ecol. 37: 52-65.
71. Thrall, P.H., Burdon, J.J. & Bever, J.D. 2002. Local adaptation in the Linum marginale-Melampsora lini host-pathogen interaction. Evolution 56: 1340-1351.
72. Tilman, D. 1988. Plant Strategies and the Dynamics and Structure of Plant Communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.
73. Toju, H. & Sota, T. 2006. Imbalance of predator and prey armament: geographic clines in phenotypic interface and natural selection. Am. Nat. 167: 105-117.
74. Trappe, J.M. & Claridge, A.W. 2005. Hypogeous fungi: evolution of reproductive and dispersal strategies through interactions with animals and mycorrhizal plants. In: The Fungal Community - Its Organization and Role in the Ecosystem (J. Dighton, J. F. White & P. Oudemans, eds), pp. 613-623. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton.
75. Van Zandt, P.A. & Mopper, S. 1998. A meta-analysis of adaptive deme formation in phytophagous insect populations. Am. Nat. 152: 597-606.
76. Wu, J., Krutovskii, K.V. & Strauss, S.H. 1998. Abundant mitochondrial genome diversity, population differentiation and convergent evolution in pines. Genetics 150: 1605-1614.
77. Wu, J., Krutovskii, K.V. & Strauss, S.H. 1999. Nuclear DNA diversity, population differentiation, and phylogenetic relationships in the California closed-cone pines based on RAPD and allozyme markers. Genome 42: 893-908.
78. Young, T.P. 1985. Lobelia telekii herbivory, mortality, and size at reproduction: Variation with growth rate. Ecology 66: 1879-1883.