Landmark coordinates aligned by procrustes analysis do not lie in Kendall's shape space

Systematic Biology

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 141-149

  Slice, Dennis E ^a  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMETRY; ECOLOGY; EVOLUTION; MATHEMATICS; PHYLOGENY;

BIOMETRY; ECOLOGY; EVOLUTION; MATHEMATICS; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 0035527386     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10635150119110     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. ADAMS, D. C., AND M. S. ROSENBERG. 1998. Partial warps, phylogeny, and ontogeny: A comment on Fink and Zelditch (1995). Syst. Biol. 47:168-173.
2. ARNQVIST, G., AND F. JOHANSSON. 1998. Ontogenetic reaction norms of predator-induced defensive morphology in dragonfly larvae. Ecology 79:1847-1858.
3. BOAS, F. 1905. The horizontal plane of the skull and the general problem of the comparison of variable forms. Science 21:862-863.
4. BOOKSTEIN, F. L. 1991. Morphometric tools for landmark data. Geometry and biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
5. BOOKSTEIN, F. L. 1996a. Standard formula for the uniform shape component in landmark data. Pages 153-168 in Advances in morphometrics (L. F. Marcus, M. Corti, A. Loy, G. J. P. Naylor, and D. E. Slice, eds.). Plenum, New York.
6. BOOKSTEIN, F. L. 1996b. Combining the tools of geometric morphometrics. Pages 131-151 in Advances in morphometrics (L. F. Marcus, M. Corti, A. Loy, G. J. P. Naylor, and D. E. Slice, eds.). Plenum, New York.
7. CALDECUTT, W. J., AND D. C. ADAMS. 1998. Morphometrics of trophic osteology in the threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Copeia 1998:827-838.
8. DRYDEN, I. L., AND K. V. MARDIA. 1998. Statistical shape analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
9. GOODALL, C. R. 1991. Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 53:285-339.
10. GOWER, J. C. 1975. Generalized Procrustes analysis. Psychometrika 40:33-51.
11. JUNGERS, W. L., A. B. FALSETTI, AND C. E. WALL. 1995. Shape, relative size, and size adjustments in morphometrics. Yearb. Phys. Anthropol. 38:137-161.
12. KENDALL, D. G. 1984. Shape manifolds, procrustean metrics, and complex projective spaces. Bull. London Math. Soc. 16:81-121.
13. KENDALL, D. G. 1985. Exact distributions for shapes of random triangles in convex sets. Adv. Appl. Prob. 17:308-329.
14. KENT, J. T. 1994. The complex Bingham distribution and shape analysis. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 56:285-299.
15. KLINGENBERG, C. P., AND G. S. MCINTYRE. 1998. Geometric morphometrics of developmental instability: Analyzing patterns of fluctuating asymmetry with Procrustes methods. Evolution 52:1363-1375.
16. MARCUS, L. F., E. HINGST-ZAHER, AND H. ZAHER. 2000. Application of landmark morphometrics to skulls representing the orders of living mammals. Hystrix It. J. Mamm. 11(1):27-47.
17. MOSIER, C. I. 1939. Determining a simple structure when loadings for certain tests are known. Psychometrika 4:149-162.
18. ROHLF, F. J. 1997. NTSYS-pc: Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Exeter Software, Setauket, NY.
19. ROHLF, F. J. 1998a. On applications of geometric morphometrics to studies of ontogeny and phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 47:147-158.
20. ROHLF, F. J. 1998b. tpsTri. Dept. Ecology and Evolution, State Univ. New York at Stony Brook.
21. ROHLF, F. J. 1998c. tpsRelw. Dept. Ecology and Evolution, State Univ. New York at Stony Brook.
22. ROHLF, F. J. 1999. Shape statistics: Procrustes superimpositions and tangent spaces. J. Classif. 16:197-223.
23. ROHLF, F. J. 2000. On the use of shape spaces to compare morphometric methods. Hystrix It. J. Mamm. 11: 8-24.
24. ROHLF, F. J., AND D. E. SLICE. 1990. Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst. Zool. 39:40-59.
25. SLICE, D. E. 1999. Morpheus et al.: Software for morphometric research. Dept. Ecology and Evolution, State Univ. New York at Stony Brook.
26. SLICE, D. E., F. L. BOOKSTEIN, L. F. MARCUS, AND F. J. ROHLF. 1996. A glossary for geometric morphometrics. Pages 531-551 in Advances in morphometrics (L. F. Marcus, M. Corti, A. Loy, G. J. P. Naylor, and D. E. Slice, eds.) Plenum, New York.
27. SMALL, C. G. 1996. The statistical theory of shape. Springer, New York.
28. SNEATH, P. H. A. 1967. Trend-surface analysis of transformation grids. J. Zool. 151:65-122.
29. SWIDERSKI, D. L., M. L. ZELDITCH, AND W. L. FINK. 1998. Why morphometrics is not special: Coding quantitative data for phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 47:508-519.
30. TAYLOR, A. B. 1997. Scapula form and biomechanics in gorillas. J. Hum. Evol. 33:529-553.
31. ZELDITCH, M. L., AND W. L. FINK. 1998. Partial warps, phylogeny and ontogeny: A reply to Adams and Rosenberg. Syst. Biol. 47:345-348.
32. ZELDITCH, M. L., W. L. FINK, D. L. SWIDERSKI, AND B. L. LUNDRIGAN. 1998. On applications of geometric morphometrics to studies of ontogeny and phylogeny: A reply to Rohlf. Syst. Biol. 47:159-167.