Direct and indirect effects of pollinators and seed predators to selection on plant and floral traits

Oikos

Volumn 104, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 15-26

  Cariveau, Daniel ^a   Irwin, Rebecca E ^a,b   Brody, Alison K ^a,c   Garcia Mayeya, Lucero Sevillano ^a   Von Der Ohe, Andrea ^a  

^a ROCKY MOUNTAIN BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLLINATION; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SEED PREDATION;

COLORADO; NORTH AMERICA; ROCKY MOUNTAINS; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALIA; CASTILLEJA; LEPIDOPTERA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; PTEROPHORIDAE; SCROPHULARIACEAE; TROCHILIDAE;

EID: 0942300487     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12641.x     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Addicott, J. F. 1986. Variation in the costs and benefits of mutualism: the interaction between yuccas and yucca moths. - Oecologia 70: 486-494.
2. Addicott, J. F. and Tyre, A. J. 1995. Cheating in an obligate mutualism: how often do yucca moths benefit yuccas? - Oikos 72: 382-394.
3. Adler, L. S. 2000. Alkaloid uptake increases fitness in a hemiparasitic plant via reduced herbivory and increased pollination. - Am. Nat. 156: 92-99.
4. Adler, L. S. 2002. Host effects on herbivory and pollination in a hemiparasitic plant. - Ecology 83: 2700-2710.
5. Adler, L. S., Karban, R. and Strauss, S. Y. 2001. Direct and indirect effects of alkaloids on plant fitness via herbivory and pollination. - Ecology 82: 2032-2044.
6. Aker, C. L. and Udovic, D. 1981. Oviposition and pollination behavior of the yucca moth Tegeticula maculata (Lepidoptera: Prodoxidae), and its relation to the reproductive biology of Yucca whipplei (Agavaceae). - Oecologia 49: 96-101.
7. Augsperger, C. K. 1981. Reproductive synchrony of a tropical shrub: experimental studies on effects on pollinators and seed predators on Hybanthus prunifolius (Violaceae). - Ecology 62: 775-788.
8. Brody, A. K. 1992. Oviposition choices by a predispersal seed predator (Hylemya sp).l. correspondence with hummingbird pollinators, and the role of plant size, density and floral morphology. - Oecologia 91: 56-62.
9. Brody, A. K. and Mitchell, R. J. 1997. Effects of experimental manipulation of inflorescence size on pollination and pre-dispersal seed predation in the hummingbird pollinated plant Ipomopsis aggregata. - Oecologia 110: 86-93.
10. Bronstein, J. L., Gouyon, P.-H., Gliddon, C. et al. 1990. The ecological consequences of flowering asynchrony in monoecious figs: a simulation study. - Ecology 71: 2145-2156.
11. Burd, M. 1994. Bateman principle and plant reproduction -the role of pollen limitation in fruit and seed set. - Bot. Rev. 60: 83-139.
12. Campbell, D. R. 1989. Inflorescence size: test of the male function hypothesis. - Am. J. Bot. 76: 730-738.
13. Campbell, D. R. 1991. Effects of floral traits on sequential components of fitness in Ipomopsis aggregata. - Am. Nat. 137: 713-737.
14. Campbell, D. R. and Halama, K. J. 1993. Resource and pollen limitations to lifetime seed production in a natural plant population. - Ecology 74: 1043-1051.
15. Campbell, D. R., Crawford, M., Brody, A. K. et al. 2002. Resistance to pre-dispersal seed predators in a natural hybrid zone. - Oecologia 131: 436-443.
16. Carpenter, F. L. 1983. Pollination energetics in avian commu-nities: simple concepts and complex realities. - In: Jones, C. E. and Little, R. J. (eds), Handbook of experimental pollination biology. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 215-234.
17. Carpenter, F. L. 1988. Pollen-transfer efficiency compensates for pollinator crashes in a specialized bird-pollinated plant. - In: Quellet, H. (ed.). Acta XIX Congr. Int. Ornithol., vol. 1. Univ. of Ottawa, Ottawa, pp. 537-548.
18. Caruso, C. M. 1999. Pollination of Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae): effects of intra- vs interspecific competition. - Am. J. Bot. 86: 663-668.
19. Caruso, C. M. 2001. Differential selection on floral traits of Ipomopsis aggregata growing in contrasting environments. - Oikos 94: 295-302.
20. Crawley, M. J. 1992. Seed predators and plant population dynamics. - In: Fenner, M. (ed.), Seeds: the ecology of regeneration in plant communities. CAB International, pp. 157-191.
21. Crawley, M. J. and Gillman, M. P. 1989. Population dynamics of cinnabar moth and ragwort in grassland. - J. Anim. Ecol. 58: 1035-1050.
22. Cronquist, A., Holmgren, A. H., Holmgren, N. H. et al. 1984. Intermountain flora: vascular plants of the intermountain west. Vol. 4. - Hafner, New York, p. 496.
23. Desouhant, E. 1998. Selection of fruits for oviposition by the chestnut weevil, Curculio elephas. - Entomol. Exp. Appl. 86: 71-78.
24. Ehrlén, J. 1996. Spatiotemporal variation in predispersal seed predation intensity. - Oecologia 108: 708-713.
25. Ehrlén, J. 1997. Risk of grazing and flower number in a perennial plant. - Oikos 80: 428-434.
26. Ehrlén, J., Käck, S. and Ågren, J. 2002. Pollen limitation, seed predation and scape length in Primula farinosa. - Oikos 97: 45-51.
27. Fenner, M., Cresswell, J. E., Hurley, R. A. et al. 2002. Relationship between capitulum size and pre-dispersal seed predation by insect larvae in common Asteraceae. - Oecologia 130: 72-77.
28. Galen, C. 1999a. Why do flowers vary? The functional ecology of variation in flower size and form within natural plant populations. - Bioscience 49: 631-640.
29. Galen, C. 1999b. Flowers and enemies: predation by nectar-thieving ants in relation to variation in floral form of an alpine wildflower, Polemonium viscosum. - Oikos 85: 426-434.
30. Galen, C. and Cuba, J. 2001. Down the tube: pollinators, predators, and the evolution of flower shape in the alpine sky pilot, Polemonium viscosum. - Evolution 55: 1963-1971.
31. Gómez, J. M. and Zamora, R. 2000. Spatial variation in the selective scenarios of Hormathophylla spinosa (Cruciferae). - Am. Nat. 155: 657-668.
32. Hainsworth, F. R., Wolf, L. L. and Mercier, T. 1984. Pollination and pre-dispersal seed predation: net effects on reproduction and inflorescence characteristics in Ipomopsis aggregata. - Oecologia 63: 405-409.
33. Hayduk, L. A. 1987. Structural equation modeling with LISREL. Essentials and advances. - The Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.
34. Herrera, C. M. 1993. Selection on floral morphology and environmental determinants of fecundity in a hawk moth-pollinated violet. - Ecol. Monogr. 63: 251-275.
35. Herrera, C. M. 1995. Floral biology, microclimate, and pollination by ectothermic bees in an early-blooming herb. - Ecology 76: 218-228.
36. Herrera, C. M. 2000. Measuring the effects of pollinators and herbivores: evidence for non-additivity in a perennial herb. - Ecology 81: 2170-2176.
37. Herrera, C. M., Medrano, M., Rey, P. J. et al. 2002. Interaction of pollinators and herbivores on plant fitness suggests a pathway for correlated evolution of mutualism- and antagonism-related traits. - Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 99: 16823-16828.
38. Inouye, D. W. 1983. The ecology of nectar robbing. - In: Bentley, B. and Elias, T. (eds), The biology of nectaries. Columbia Univ. Press, pp. 153-173.
39. Karban, R. and Baldwin, I. T. 1997. Induced responses to herbivory. - Univ. of Chicago Press.
40. Kearns, C. A. and lnouye, D. W. 1993. Techniques for pollination biologists. - Univ. of Colorado Press.
41. Kingsolver, J. G. and Schemske, D. W. 1991. Path analyses of selection. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 6: 276-280.
42. Kudoh, H. and Whigham, D. F. 1998. The effect of petal size manipulation on pollinator/seed-predator mediated female reproductive success of Hibiscus moscheutos. - Oecologia 117: 70-79.
43. Lande, R. and Arnold, S. J. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. - Evolution 37: 1210-1226.
44. Li, C. C. 1975. Path analysis: a primer. - Boxwood, Pacific Grove, CA.
45. Loehlin, J. C. 1987. Latent variable models. - Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
46. Lohman, D. J., Zangerl, A. R. and Berenbaum, M. R. 1996. Impact of floral herbivory by parsnip webworm (Oecophoridae: Depressaria pastinacella Duponchel) on the pollination and fitness of wild parsnip (Apiaceae: Pastinaca sativa L.). - Am. Midl. Nat. 136: 407-412.
47. Louda, S. M. and Potvin, M. A. 1995. Effect of inflorescence-feeding insects on the demography and lifetime fitness of a native plant. - Ecology 76: 229-245.
48. Marvier, M. A. 1996. Parasitic plant-host interactions: plant performance and indirect effects on parasite-feeding herbivores. - Ecology 77: 1398-1409.
49. Marvier, M. A. 1998. Mixed diet improves performance and herbivore resistance of a parasitic plant. - Ecology 79: 1272-1280.
50. Mitchell, R. J. 1992. Testing evolutionary and ecological hypotheses using path analysis and structural equation modeling. - Funct. Ecol. 6: 123-129.
51. Mitchell, R. J. 1993. Path analysis: pollination. - In: Scheiner, S. M. and Gurevitch, J. (eds), Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Chapman and Hall, pp. 211-231.
52. Molau, U., Eriksen, B. and Teilmann Knudsen, J. 1989. Predispersal seed predation in Bartsia alpina. - Oecologia 81: 181-185.
53. Mothershead, K. and Marquis, R. J. 2000. Fitness impacts of herbivory through indirect effects on plant-pollinator interactions in Oenothera macrocurpa. - Ecology 81: 30-40.
54. Myers, R. H. 1990. Classical and modern regression with applications, 2nd edition. - PWS Kent, Boston, MA.
55. Ohashi, K. and Yahara, T. 2000. Effects of flower production and predispersal seed predation on reproduction in Cirsium purpuratum. - Can. J. Bot. 78: 230-236.
56. Petraitis, P. S., Dunham, A. E. and Niewiarowski, P. H. 1996. Inferring multiple causality: the limitations of path analysis. - Funct. Ecol. 10: 421-431.
57. Pettersson, M. W. 1992. Taking a chance on moths: oviposition by Delia flavifrons (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) on the flowers of bladder campion, Silene vulgaris (Caryophyllaceae). - Ecol. Ent. 17: 57-62.
58. Pilson, D. 2000. Herbivory and natural selection on flowering phenology in wild sunflower, Helianthus annuus. - Oecologia 122: 72-82.
59. Proctor, M., Yeo, P. and Lack, A. 1996. The natural history of pollination. - Timber Press, Portland, OR.
60. Randall, M. G. M. 1986. The predation of predispersed Juncus squarrosus seeds by Coleophora alticolella (Lepidoptera) larvae over a range of altitudes in northern England. - Oecologia 69: 460-465.
61. Rencher, A. C. 1995. Methods of multivariate analysis. - John Wiley & Sons.
62. Schemske, D. W. and Horvitz, C. C. 1988. Plant-animal interactions and fruit production in a neotropical herb: a path analysis. - Ecology 69: 128-1137.
63. Schemske, D. W. and Horvitz, C. C. 1989. Temporal variation in selection on a floral character. - Evolution 43: 461-465.
64. Shipley, B. 1999. Testing causal explanations in organismal biology: causation, correlation and structural equation modeling. - Oikos 86: 374-382.
65. Thompson, J. D. 2001. How do visitation patterns vary among pollinators in relation to floral display and floral design in a generalist pollination system? - Oecologia 126: 386-394.
66. Thompson, J. N. 1994. The coevolutionary process. - Univ. of Chicago Press.
67. Waser, N. M., Chittka, L., Price, M. V. et al. 1996. Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters. - Ecology 77: 1043-1060.
68. Wiebes, J. T. 1979. Coevolution of figs and their insect pollinators. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 10: 1-12.
69. Wright, S. 1921. Correlation and causation. - J. Agric. Res. 20: 557-585.
70. Wright, S. 1934. The method of path coefficients. - Ann. Math. Stat. 5: 161-215.
71. Young, H. J. and Stanton, M. L. 1990. Influences of floral variation on pollen removal and seed production in wild radish. - Ecology 71: 536-547.
72. Zimmerman, M. 1980. Reproduction in Polemonium: pre-dispersal seed predation. - Ecology 61: 502-506.